Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Brown v. Trump”
Coleman v. Trumppublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA / | SEP 1 9 2019 Clork, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Nathaniel Coleman, ) Courts for the District of Columb: Plaintiff, Vv. Civil Action No. 19-2187 (UNA) Donald Trump et al., Defendants. ’ MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter, brought pro se, is before the Court on review of the complaint and plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the in forma pauperis application and dismiss the case pur
Saget v. Trumppublic domain
HON. WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge The parties dispute whether, and to what extent, this Court should admit the deposition transcripts of Kathryn Anderson, Robert Law, Francis Cissna, Donald Neufeld, and Kathy Kovarik, all of whom are employees of Defendant Department of Homeland Security. Plaintiffs seek to admit only designated portions of the
Saget v. Trumppublic domain
WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs bring this action challenging then-Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Elaine C. Duke's November 20, 2017 determination to terminate Haiti's Temporary Protected Status designation based on her assessment that Haiti had sufficiently recovered from a 2010 earthquake and there were no longer "extraordinary and temporary conditions" preventing Haitian nationals residing in
Saget v. Trumppublic domain
WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs bring this action challenging then-Acting Secretary of Homeland Security *292Elaine C. Duke's November 20, 2017 determination to terminate Haiti's Temporary Protected Status designation, based on her assessment that Haiti had sufficiently recovered from a 2010 earthquake and there w
California v. Trumppublic domain
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge The Affordable Care Act requires health insurance companies to subsidize the cost of co-payments and deductibles for lower-income people. In turn, the Act requires the federal government to make advance payments to the companies to cover the cost of this subsidy. The legab
Low v. Trump University, LLCpublic domain
ORDER: (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AWARDS [10cv940, ECF Nos. 589, 590.] [13cv2519, ECF Nos. 294, 295.] Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge On February 1
State of Hawaii v. Donald Trumppublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM: For the third time, we are called upon to assess the legality of the President’s efforts to bar over 150 million nationals of six designated countries 1 from entering the United States or being issued immigrant visas that they w
Roger Day, Jr. v. Donald Trumppublic domain
SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge: Appellant, federal prisoner Roger Charles Day, Jr., initiated this action by a pro se petition in the United States District Court, seeking relief by way of writ from what he alleged to be an illegally imposed sentence. The petition is self-described as “pursuant to” various sections of the United States Code and Constitution,
Sherri B. Simpson v. Trump University, LLCpublic domain
OPINION NGUYEN, Circuit Judge: Trump University, now defunct, was a for-profit entity that purported to teach Donald J. Trump’s “secrets of success” in the real estate industry. During the 2016 presidential election, Trump University and Trump were defendants in three lawsuits alleging fraud and violations of var
International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trumppublic domain
TRAXLER, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment: I concur in the judgment of the majority insofar as it affirms the district court’s issuance of a nationwide preliminary injunction as to Section 2(c) of the Executive Order against the officers, agents, and employees of the Executive Branch of the United States, and anyone acting under their authorization or direction, who would attempt to enforce it, beca
Intl. Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trumppublic domain
TRAXLER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I agree with my dissenting colleagues insofar as they hold that the plaintiffs lack standing to assert their claims under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Accordingly, I do not reach the merits of those claims. With regard to the plaintiffs' claim that Proclamation No. 9,645 likely violates the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution, I believe they have sta
State of Hawaii v. Donald Trumppublic domain
OPINION 1 PER CURIAM: We are asked to delineate the statutory and constitutional limits to the President’s power to control immigration in this appeal of the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining two sections of Executive Order 13780 (“E02” or “the Order”), “Protecting the Nation From Fore
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF ) GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL- ) CIO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:18-cv-1261 (KBJ) ) DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF ) GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL- ) CIO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:18-cv-1261 (KBJ) ) DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
Trump v. Trumppublic domain
Trump v Trump (2023 NY Slip Op 23180) [*1] Trump v Trump 2023 NY Slip Op 23180 Decided on June 9, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Reed, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF ) GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL- ) CIO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:18-cv-1261 (KBJ) ) DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
Trump v. Barbarapublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Carroll v. Trumppublic domain
24-644 Carroll v. Trump United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2024 Argued: June 24, 2025 Decided: August 8, 2025 No. 24-644 E. JEAN CARROLL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DONALD J
Kingdom v. Trumppublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALISHEA KINGDOM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:25-cv-691-RCL DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiffs in this dispute are inmates in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) who have been medically diagnosed with gender dysphoria
Noha v. Trumppublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) OLHA NOHA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1: 25-cv-01995 (UNA) ) DONALD JOHN TRUMP, )