Cases

WILLIAMS, J. liThe plaintiffs, Rochundra Garrison and Sam Winston, Jr., appeal a summary judgment in favor of defendants, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Duane Lucky, Jr. The district court also granted State Farm’s exception of.no right of action against Garrison and denied the insurer’s motion to strike an affidavit. For the following reasons, we reverse in part and remand. FACTS

ORDER SAM SPARKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Plaintiff State Farm Fire and Casualty Company’s Motion for Full and Final Summary Judgment [#28]; Defendant Jena Kirkpatrick, individually *646and as representative of the estate of Ellis McClane’s Res

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DANIEL D. CRABTREE, District Judge. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company brought suit against Dallas N. Hartman, Charles C. Conner, III, Branlyn Finnell as natural guardian and next friend of minor C.M., Jamie N. Bell, Jared M. Wilkinson, and The Pantry, Inc. seeking a declaratory judgment that it owed no coverage arising out of an accident and no duty to defend Kenneth

KEATY, Judge. 11 State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (State Farm) appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of its insureds, Galyn and James Montgomery (Plaintiffs), finding State Farm liable for damages done to Plaintiffs’ home by Hurricane Rita and its aftermath and awarding Plaintiffs damages, penalties, attorney fees, and costs. Plaintiffs answer the appeal, seeking an additional award of damages for mental

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”) seeks a declara*995tion under-28 U.S.C. § 2201 that it owes no duty to defend or. indemnify its po

58 P.3d 217 (2002) 2002 OK CIV APP 107 Tammy BROWN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY and State Farm General Insurance Company, Defendants, and JJMA Investigations and Consultants and Jody Cooper, Defendants/Appellees. No. 97,485. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3. July 22, 2002. Certiorari

PRESIDING JUSTICE O’MALLEY delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm1), appeals from the trial court’s granting of a motion filed by plaintiff, Frank C. Bemis, D.C., pursuant to the substitution of judge statute under section 2 — 1001 of the Code of Civil Procedure (the Code) (735

REILLY, J. ¶ 1. Larry Krueger purchased a water softener from Menards and installed it in a house he owned. The water softener was manufactured by Hague Quality Water, International and had a limited warranty. The warranty provided that in the event of a defect, Hague would repair or replace the defective parts but would not be responsible for any "incidental, consequential or secondary damages."

In an action for a judgment declaring the rights and obligations of the parties under certain policies of insurance, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), entered June 22, 2006, as, (a) granted the defendant’s motion for leave to reargue that branch of her prior cross motion for summary judgment on her second counterclaim which was for an award of damages for breach

In an action for a judgment declaring the rights and obligations of the parties under certain policies of insurance, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), entered December 19, 2005, which denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the defendant’s second counterclaim to recover damages for breach of a rental dwelling insurance policy and granted the defendant’s cross motion

State Farm Fire and Casualty Company ("State Farm"), the defendant in an action pending in the Coffee Circuit Court, petitions for a writ of mandamus directing Judge Thomas E. Head III to vacate his order denying State Farm's motion to compel production of documents and directing Judge Head to grant that motion. We grant the petition in part and deny it in part. In 1997, Barbara Carrington and her brother, Gary Brown, among others, were sued by other relatives in connection wit

JUSTICE GABRIEL delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶ 1 In this original proceeding pursuant to C.A.R. 21, we review the district court's determination that petitioner State Farm Fire and Casualty Company ("State Farm") impliedly waived the attorney-client privilege protecting communications between it and its former counsel when it submitted an affidavit from that former counsel to r

OPINION RILEY, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellant-Plaintiff/Counterclaimant-De-fendant, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (State Farm), appeals the trial court’s denial of its Trial Rule 60(B) Motion, which rejected its request for relief on the limited issue of defamation after a jury awarded 14.5 million dolla

Kato, J. ¶1 As a prank, Anthony Parrella fired a pellet at James Potts. It hit James in the eye, causing serious *539injury. Anthony’s parents claimed coverage under their State Farm Fire and Casualty Company homeowners insurance policy. State Farm determined there was no coverage. After trial, the court agreed with the insurer because Anthony’s act was deliberate

JUSTICE GOLDENHERSH delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Justices Spomer and Wexstten concurred in the judgment and opinion. OPINION Plaintiff, Golub and Associates, Inc., a public insurance adjuster, filed suit in

589 F.3d 105 (2009) STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO., Appellant in No. 08-2220 v. The ESTATE OF Thomas W. MEHLMAN; William F. Mehlman, Executor of the Estate of Thomas Mehlman; Maria Iacono. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Estate of Thomas W. Mehlman; William F. Mehlman, Executor of the Estate of Thomas Mehlman; Maria Iacono Maria Iacono, Appellant in No. 08-2261. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Estate of

CANADY, Judge. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, uninsured motorist insurance carriers, appeal a judgment in favor of Scott David Pettigrew and Victoria L. Pet-tigrew on their uninsured motorist claims. Because the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence which the appellant insurers sought to introduce concerning claims for prior injuries suffered by Mr. Petti-grew, we r

OPINION VAIDIK, Judge. Case Summary In April 2006, central Indiana suffered a large hailstorm. Joseph Radcliff formed a company to repair the storm-damaged homes. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company began denying many of its policyholders’ claims even though other insurance companies were paying similar claims. Radcliff and hi

In an action for a judgment declaring the rights and obligation of the parties under certain insurance policies, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), entered January 31, 2003, as searched the record and granted the defendant summary judgment on her counterclaim for lost rental income, (2) an order of the same court dated July 15, 2003, which denied that branch

Howard McCray, Jr., and his wife Donna McCray appeal from a summary judgment in favor of State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company. We reverse and remand. Facts In 1990, Karen Smith Acker, a State Farm insurance agent, sold Howard McCray and Donna McCray homeowners insurance on their residence. The declarations page of the policy listed the named insured as "McCray, Howard C. Jr Donna, 7195 10th Avenue, Altoona, Alabama 35952-8313." During their