Cases

JUDGMENT Per Curiam This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing, and the motion to appoint counsel, it is ORDERED that the motion to appoint counsel be denied. In civil cases, appellants are not entitled

MEMORANDUM OPINION Ketanji B. Jackson, United States District Judge Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has submitted a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. C

Judge Sandra Cabrina Jenkins Lin this spit for damages, plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s judgments granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying plaintiffs’ motion for new trial. Finding that'our appellate jurisdiction has nót been properly invoked by a valid final judgment,' we dismiss the appeal without prejudice and remand this matter to the trial court. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUN

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment by Plaintiff Starr Indemnity & Liability Company ("Starr") and Defendant Limmie Young, III. ECF Nos. 86, 88. The Court has previously provided its oral ruling on these motions. This order codifies the Court's reasoning as to these motions. For the reasons stated below,

Nadeau, J. The plaintiff, Darren Starr, appeals from an order of the Trial Court (Fitzgerald, J.) denying his request for interest on a judgment he obtained against the State of New Hampshire (State). He also contends that the order failed to address the legality of the surcharge currently imposed on goods sold at the State prison canteen. We reverse and remand. This case returns to us following rema

Rickman, Judge. In this declaratory judgment action, Gregory Saxon appeals from three trial court orders granting summary judgment in favor of three insurance companies — Starr Indemnity & Liability Company (“Starr Indemnity”), First Acceptance Insurance Company of Georgia, Inc. (“First Acceptance”), and Knightbrook Insurance Company (“Knight-brook”). We affirm.

[Cite as Starr v. Ohio Dept. Commerce, Div. of Real Estate & Professional Licensing, 2021-Ohio-2243.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Rick E. Starr, : Appellant-Appellant, : No. 20AP-47 (C.P.C. No. 19CV-5149) v.

NADEAU, J. The plaintiff, Darren Starr, appeals from an order of the Superior Court {Manias, J.) granting the State’s motion to dismiss. The superior court dismissed the plaintiffs challenge to a 5% surcharge assessed on purchases made in State prison commissaries. We reverse and remand. The plaintiff is incarcerated in the New Hampshire State Prison system. The prison operates a commissary where the

682 February 12, 2025 No. 83 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JADE DAMIAN STARR, Defendant-Appellant. Lane County Circuit Court 22CR17208; A180618 Stephen W. Morgan, Judge. Submitted September 25, 2024. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal App

KAZEN, District Judge: An insurer sought a declaratory judgment that it was not required to show prejudice before denying coverage for liability arising out of a pollution occurrence which the insured did not report within thirty days, as required by a pollution buyback clause in the policy. The district court granted the insurer’s motion for

[Cite as Dublin v. Starr, 2022-Ohio-2298.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT City of Dublin, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 21AP-173 (M.C. No. 2020 CRB 011701) v. :

70 So.3d 128 (2011) Jerry STARR, individually and on behalf of his minor daughter, Jamie Starr, Plaintiff-Appellee v. STATE of Louisiana, through the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT, Defendant-Appellant. John M. Byrd, Eugene Moore, Chris Navarro and Joseph Michael Williams, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development, Defendant-Appellant. Nos.

OPINION AND ORDER PATRICK J. DUGGAN, District Judge. This case involves the tragic death of an infant child named Miranda Henry while she was in the custody of a foster parent. The child’s natural father, Marvin Brown, brought this action on behalf of his deceased daughter against the foster parent, Defendant Dana Hatch, as well as the child placement agency, Defendant Starr Commonwealth (colle

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D. We granted leave to appeal in this ease, R. 2:2 — 3(b); R. 2:2-4, to examine the ruling of the Law Division judge which granted absolute judicial immunity from claims by third-parties to an attorney designated by a Family Part judge to sell a home owned by litigants in a marital dissolution proceeding. The purchasers of the property s

Franklin County, No. 91AP-1149. Moyer, C.J., Holmes and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 759 Plaintiff-appellant, Bernard B. Hurst, Director of Transportation for the state of Ohio ("ODOT"), appeals the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas which awarded defendants-appellees, Harry M. and Helen M. Starr, $14,125 due to appellant's appropriation of a portion of appellees' residential proper

Filed 2/17/23 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX CITY OF OXNARD, 2d Civ. No. B314601 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2020- Plaintiff and Respondent, 00539039-CU-MC-VTA) (Ventura

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DEPARTMENT ONE SANDRA K. STARR, Appellant, v. ARIZONA BOARD OF FINGERPRINTING, Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 20-0432 FILED 8-5-2021 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. LC2020-000050-001 The Honorable Douglas Gerlach, Judge

Filed 1/19/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX CITY OF OXNARD, 2d Civ. No. B314601 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2020- Plaintiff and Respondent, 00539039-CU-MC-VTA) (Ventura County) v. AARON STARR, Defendant and Appellant. Voters pa

193 B.R. 195 (1996) In re Donald O. REYNOLDS, Debtor. Victor M. STARR, Heidi Starr, Appellants, v. Donald O. REYNOLDS, Appellee. Civ. No. 95-5333 (GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. February 5, 1996. *196 *197 *198 Patricia A. Cauldwell,