Cases

FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON FEBRUARY 13, 2025 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON FEBRUARY 13, 2025 SARAH R. PENDLETON

OPINION HAYES, District Judge: We must decide whether the use of force policy adopted by the City of Seattle violates the Second Amendment right of police officers to use firearms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense. We conclude that the policy survives intermediate scrutiny and is, therefore, constitutional. We affirm the judgment of the distric

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF SEATTLE, SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, No. 80467-7-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. PUBLISHED OPINION SEATTLE POLICE OFFICERS’ GUILD, Appellant, and ARBITRATOR JANE WILKINSON and ADLEY SHEPHERD, Additional Parties. COBURN, J. — This appeal arises fr

FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON FEBRUARY 13, 2025 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON FEBRUARY 13, 2025 SARAH R. PENDLETON

ORDER RICHARD A. JONES, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the court on a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment from Defendants. No one requested oral argument, and the court finds oral argument unnecessary. For the reasons stated herein, the court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 9) and GRANTS in part and DENIE

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MATTHEW MEINECKE, No. 23-35481 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv- v. 00352-BJR CITY OF SEATTLE; DANIEL NELSON, Lieutenant, Seattle Police OPINION Department; ROBERT BROWN, Lieutenant, Seattle Police Department; SEAN CULBERTSON, Police Officer, Seattle Police Department,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DEREK TUCSON; ROBIN No. 23-35449 SNYDER; MONSIEREE DE CASTRO; ERIK MOYA-DELGADO, D.C. No. 2:23-cv- 00017-MJP Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. OPINION CITY OF SEATTLE, Defendant-Appellant, and ALEXANDER PATTON; TRAVIS JORDAN; DYLAN NELSON; JOHN DOES, 1-4; 1-2,

Schindler, J. ¶1 Twelve-year-old Alajawan S. Brown was shot in the back and died on April 29,2010. On June 17, 2010, the State filed criminal charges of murder in the first degree of Alajawan and unlawful possession of a firearm against Curtis John Walker. Walker pleaded not guilty. Walker asserted he did not shoot Alajawan. Following a three-week trial beginning in January 2012, the jury convicted Walker of murder in the first d

This oj^.nlonj5(5,|jsAf9r;!agg FT IN CLERKS OFFICE at '^'.QOOJTv- onOO- eUFRaC COURT,8IXIE OF mGHMGnCM U 1M75 12 mr F SUSAN L. CARLSON CHIEF JUSTKE SUPREME COURT CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ROLAND KILLIAN,

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

/wmE\ yTIN CLERKS OFFICE X This opinion was 'pjppFMPeoigCT.SIXtECFVaA^^ filed for record DATE ' 1 4" ' ^ CHIEF Susan L. Carlson Supreme Court Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHI

FILED COUT APPE ALS BlYk l. STATE OF WASHINGTON 201B DEC -3 AM 10: 45 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ANITA KHANDELWAL, INTERIM ) No. 78058-1-1 DIRECTOR, KING COUNTY ) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC DEFENSE, ) DIV

This opinion was filed for record 1 at ~ ,00~ on::AtJtlAJ}~1 \\Cr D \'W SUS NL.CARLSON

Fairhurst, J. ¶1 RCW 49.48.030 provides that employees are entitled to reasonable attorney fees from their employer or former employer “[i]n any action in which any person is successful in recovering judgment for wages or salary owed to him or her.” This case concerns whether a city of Seattle (City) employee who recovered wages from a Seattle Civil Service Commission (Commission) hearing is entitled to attorney fees under RCW 49

This ,pinion was file~ for record at · 00 OJV\ on Q~ 5 1 l.AJI_ (p . Oak-d~ ,__~ ~· Suprem7court Cler

OPINION OF THE COURT Kathryn E. Freed, J. This interim order on the petition is as follows: In December 2014, respondents New York City Police Department (hereinafter NYPD) and Commissioner William J. Brat-ton commenced a voluntary pilot program to employ body-worn cameras (hereinafter BWC) by operations order 48, under which 54 BWCs have been distributed to officers on a volunteer basis.

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

Madsen, C.J. ¶1 The city of Seattle and Officers Kevin McDaniel and Pohna Lim (collectively City of Seattle or the city) challenge the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment. Respondent Elsa Robb, on behalf of her deceased husband Michael Robb, alleges that law enforcement acted negligently by failing to pick up and remove shotgun shells lying near Samson B

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, District Judge. Plaintiff Martin Monetti, Jr., appearing through counsel, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983, naming two individual police officers, Shandy Cobane and Mary Woollum, and the City of Seattle. The complaint also asserts state law claims of assault and battery, outrage, negligent infliction of emoti

243 P.3d 919 (2010) SEATTLE TIMES COMPANY and Wm. Michael Hanbey, Petitioners, v. The Honorable Susan K. SERKO and the Honorable Bryan E. Chushcoff, Respondents. Dewayne Darcus Allen, Ricky Hinton, Eddie Lee Davis, Douglas Davis, and Quiana Williams, Respondents/Intervenors. No. 84691-0. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued September 14, 2010. Decid