Cases

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered June 1, 2011, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered April 27, 2011, which granted defendants’ motions and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment. Plaintiff alleges that the four defendant phys

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered June 1, 2011, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered April 27, 2011, which granted defendants’ motions and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment. Plaintiff alleges that the four defendant phys

Garry, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Giardino, J.), rendered July 29, 2010, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted assault in the first degree. In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted assault in the first degree and waived his right to appeal. Prior to sentencing, defendant was assigned new counse

Garry, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Giardino, J.), rendered July 29, 2010, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted assault in the first degree. In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted assault in the first degree and waived his right to appeal. Prior to sentencing, defendant was assigned new counse

115 P.3d 1098 (2005) 2005 WY 80 Patricia MICHAELIS, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. 04-73. Supreme Court of Wyoming. July 15, 2005. *1100 Kenneth M. Koski, State Public Defender; Donna D. Domonkos, Appellate Counsel; and Ryan R. Roden (argued), Senior Assistant App

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 99-2-03886-4, Salvatore F. Cozza, J., entered January 3, 2001. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Kato, J., concurred in by Brown, A.C.J., and Schultheis, J.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE ANSCHUTZ CORPORATION and ) LIGHTEDGE HOLDINGS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0710-JRS ) BROWN ROBIN CAPITAL, LLC, ) SIERRA TWO INTERNET, INC., ) LUCAS BRAUN, RYAN ROBINSON, ) JACK D’ANGELO, BOBBY BOUGHTON ) and MICHAEL SMERKLO, )

In I the Misssouri Court C off Appeaals Westeern Disttrict ANDRE EW GARR RETT, ) ) Appellant, ) D78443 WD

Presiding: The Honorable GEORGE H. KING, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order re: Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 325) Defendant Celgene Corp. (“Celgene”) moves for summary judgment on all claims asserted by Plaintiff-Relator Beverly Brown (“Brown”) in her Third Amended Complaint. We have considered the parties’ joint brief (Doc. 325), the authorities and r

Findings of Fact. W. W. Haupt died at his residence in Hays county, Tex., on the 27th day of August, 1907, leaving surviving him his wife, Sarah A. Haupt, and six children, to wit: Mrs. A. B. Landers, wife of A. P. *Page 786 Landers; Mrs. Lelia Cooper, a widow; Mrs. Bassie Nance, wife of J. M. Nance; G. B. Haupt; L. M. Haupt; and Mrs. Touay Barbee, wife of W. H. Barbee. He left an instrument in his own handwri

Per Curiam. This suit is for infringement of the second claim of complainants’ patent, No. 322,194, dated July 14, 1885, for “the manufacture of chloroform, and purified acetates.” ' The claim reads as follows: “(2) The production of chloroform from the liquid products resulting from the decomposition of crude acetates at high temperatures, by subjecting said liquid products to the action of a hypochlo

ADAMS, District Judge. This is a suit for the infringement of letters patent of the United States, No. 322,194, for certain new and useful improvements in the manufacture of chloroform and acetic acid, or purified acetates, dated July 14,. 1885. The patentee describes his invention as follows: “This invention is based upon the discovery that when a crude acetate, ' as of lime, is subjected to a dry d

LEONARD P. MOORE, Circuit Judge (dissenting). Plaintiffs claim Federal court jurisdiction under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C.A. § 80a-l et seq. and under principles of pendent jurisdiction, Passing by the stereotype allegations of interlocking managements and directorates, domination and control always present in stockholders’suits, the amended complaint sets forth a series of alleged wrongs which can

YARRUT, Judge. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying him medical payments beyond the 400-week limitation of the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Statute governing wage compensation payments. The District Court gave no reasons for judgment, but Defendant urges that, once all compensation has been paid, further medical payments automatically become prescribed.

PRESIDING JUSTICE RAKOWSKJ delivered the opinion of the court: Mary Ann Conway (the decedent) was admitted to the University of Chicago Hospital (Hospital) on July 21, 1978. At the time of her admission she was six days postpartum, and pursuant to hospital policy, she was admitted to the obstetrical and gynecological service. Her

294 F.2d 415 Ethel BROWN and Harry Brown, Appellees-Plaintiffs,v.Hugh BULLOCK, Arthur F. Burns, Robert E. Clark, GraysonKirk, Frank Pace, Jr. and Calvin Bullock, Ltd.,Appellants-Defendants and Nathaniel P. Hill, John M. Hincks,Harris J. Nelson, Maxwell D. Taylor and Dividend Shares,Inc., Defendants. No. 404, Docket 26948. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Upon request of appellant, we file the following conclusions of fact in this case, to wit: Conclusions of Fact. — 1. It was agreed by the parties to the suit, that on and long prior to the 1st day of March, 1893, the land sued for by plaintiff, the appellant, was owned by W.W. Lock by title in fee simple. 2. March 1, 1893, W.W. Lock and his wife, Laura A. Lock, executed a deed of trust to R.L. Brown, trustee, conveying, with other lands, the land in suit to the tr

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was briefed and argued by counsel. The Court has accorded the issues full consideration and determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. CIR. R. 36(d). For the reasons stated below, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the

351 F.Supp.2d 1 (2005) MUELLER CO. and Mueller International, Inc. v. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. No. CIV. 03-170-JD. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. January 10, 2005. Brian L. Michaelis, Esq., Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels, Boston, MA, for Plaintiffs. David B. Wilson, Esq., Robinson & Cole, Boston, MA, for Defendant.

ORDER DONALD W. MOLLOY, District Judge. The defendants (hereafter, “BNSF”) move to dismiss the plaintiffs’ wrongful occupation and unjust enrichment claims. The plaintiffs oppose dismissal of the former but not the latter. BNSF’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. The plaintiffs’ wrongful occupation claim alleges that BNSF violated Montana Code Annotated § 27-1-318, whic