Cases

ORDER URSULA UNGARO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification. D.E. 127. This Motion is fully briefed and ripe for disposition. THE COURT has considered the Motion and the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED IN PART

[Cite as Teays Valley Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Struckman, 2023-Ohio-244.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY TEAYS VALLEY LOCAL SCHOOL : DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 21CA7 v.

736 F.Supp.2d 602 (2010) Christopher BROWN, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Defendant. No. 07-CV-4811 (JFB) (ETB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 3, 2010. *603 James Griffin, Brian Ku, and Louis Mussman, Ku & Mussman, P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiff. Andrew Reginald Scott, Office of the Nassau Co

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 05-0136V Filed: June 24, 2015 For Publication ******************************** LAURA HOLT, parent of * A.H.T., a minor, * Autism; Entitlement; * Mitochondrial

163 Ariz. 608 (1989) 790 P.2d 263 CITY OF PRESCOTT, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff, Counterdefendant, Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. TOWN OF CHINO VALLEY, a municipal corporation, Defendant, Counterclaimant, Appellant, Cross-Appellee. No. 1 CA-CIV 9754. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. November 14, 1989. Review D

(2008) MEIJER, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant. Walgreen Co., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendant. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendant. Civil Action Nos. 05-2195 (CKK), 06-494(CKK), 06-795(CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. Augu

ORDER ON DEFENDANT PATHEON’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION Jonathan Goodman, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This litigation arose out of a Collaboration Agreement between two companies involved in the pharmaceutical business, Plaintiff Procaps S.A. (“Procaps”) and Defendant Patheon Inc. (“Patheon”). Procaps and Patheon have spent much of the past three years involved in an expensive, bitter, time-consuming, and

ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS Sandra S. Beckwith, Senior Judge, United States District Court Overview Before the Court are seven motions for summary judgment filed by the Defendant, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (“Chipotle”). Each motion seeks entry of judgment on the claims of one 6f the seven Plaintiffs. (Docs. 36-42) Plaintiffs have filed a combined response brief to all seven motions (

Ringland, Judge. {¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Judy Roberts, administrator of the estate of Jonathan Roberts, and Gregoria Guzman, administrator of the estate of Rudolfo *440Guzman, appeal from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas decision granting summary judgment to defendants-appellees, RMB Enterprises, Inc. (“RMB”), Bowling Transportation, Inc. (“BTI”), Diamond

422 B.R. 783 (2009) In re TOUSA, INC., et al., Debtors. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Citicorp North America, Inc., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-10928-JKO. Adversary No. 08-1435-JKO. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division. October 30, 2009. *

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by e-mail at the following address: reporter@courts.state.nh.us. Opinions are available on the Internet

HALLER, J. *268The Orange County Water District (the District) brought this action to recover costs associated with the North Basin Groundwater Protection Project (NBGPP), a proposed $200 million effort intended to address groundwater contamination in northern Orange County, California caused by volatile organic compounds (VOC's) and other ch

678 F.Supp.2d 589 (2009) Randall & Heather LOZAR, Juan & Erica Cortez, Randy T. Baker & Marcy Baker, Sonny & Deanna Bustillos, Juanita & Juan Rodriguez, Dale Zuidema, David Nauta, Daniel & Nyoka Martinez, Harold & Deana Hicks, Jennifer Hicks & Clifton Hicks, Janice Reed, Stephen Martin and Frances Martin, Jane Jacobson and Leon Stam, Noemi Diaz Miguel, Sigfredo Arriola, San Juan Benevides, Martin De Lucas, Felipa Diaz, Ann

RECKTENWALD, C.J., NAKAYAMA, McKENNA, POLLACK, AND WILSON, JJ. OPINION OF THE COURT BY POLLACK, J. *1157 This case is a consolidated appeal from twenty-nine General Excise Tax assessments levied by the Director of Taxation of the State of Hawai'i against five online

[Cite as Pointe At Gateway Condominium Owner's Assn., Inc. v. Schmelzer, 2013-Ohio-3615.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 98761 and 99130 POINTE AT GATEWAY CONDOMINIUM OWNER’S ASSOCIATION, INC.

447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter

412 B.R. 122 (2009) In re GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 09-11977(ALG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. May 14, 2009. *123 Adam P. Strochak, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, Washington, DC, Ashlea Brown, Newland & Associates, PLLC, Little Rock, AR, Gary Holtzer, Marcia L. Goldstein, Weil Gotshal

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (D.E.663) AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (D.E.441) JOAN A. LENARD, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation issued by U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on November 30, 2008 (“Report,” D.E. 663), recommending that the Motion for Class Certification filed by Plaintiffs o