Cases

SEE, Justice. In this workers’ compensation case, Curtis Dale Holton petitioned this Court for certiorari review of the Court of Civil Appeals’ judgment reversing the trial court’s award of workers’ compensation benefits. The trial court found that Holton was injured in the line and scope of his employment and that he is permanently and totally disabled. We granted Holton’s petition; we reverse and remand.

EBEL, Circuit Judge. In this case, we must determine'whether a contract between two defendant general contractors and a plaintiff subcontractor requires the general contractors to pay the subcontractor for the work the subcontractor performed only if the general contractors are first paid on their own contract with the project owner. In making this determination, we address th

ORDER AND OPINION J. Michelle Childs, United States District Court Judge Defendants DIRECTV, Inc., DIRECTV, LLC (together, “DirecTV”) and MasTec North America, Inc. (“MasTec”) (collectively, “Defendants”)1 have filed 14 motions seeking summary judgment on claims arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., asserted by Plaintiffs Jame

Judge Rosemary Ledet _JjThis is a suit by a subcontractor against a general contractor alleging, *942among other things, breach of contract and violation of the prompt pay and misapplication of funds statutes. La. R.S. 9:2784 (prompt pay statute); La. R.S. 9:4814 (misapplication of funds statute).. Boes Iron Works, Inc. (“Boes”), the subcontractor, commenced this ca

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. SRINIVASAN, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Act protects employees’ right to engage in concerted activities. That right encompasses protesting an employer’s actions or policies through an appeal to the public for support. But while the Act protects employees’ right to engage in such third-party appeal

OPINION Opinion by Justice Moseley “In 2008, oil and gas companies descended on east Texas ... seeking to acquire leases to exploit the Haynesville Shale formation, which they viewed as having enormous potential.”1 During this frenzied period, Chesapeake Louisiana, L.P, (Chesapeake), entered into a letter agreement with Buffco Production, Inc. (Buffco), and Tw

COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES: SUPERIOR STEEL, INC., AND BEN HUR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Griffin Terry Sumner, Louisville, John Kendrick Wells, IV, Donald Scott Gurney, Frost Brown Todd, LLC. COUNSEL FOR APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES: THE ASCENT AT ROEBLING'S BRIDGE, LLC, Mark T. Hayden, John Nalbandian, Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP. CORPOREX DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LLC., AN

MEMORANDUM OPINION ' PETER J. MESSITTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The United States of America, for the use and benefit of Tusco, Inc., and Tusco, Inc. in its own capacity (collectively “Tus-co”) have sued Clark Construction Group, LLC (“Clark”) and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America (“Travelers”) (collectively “Defendants”) based on a dispute over work Tusco performed on a federal construct

ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA

MEMORANDUM OPINION T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge. Among the various issues presented on a threshold dismissal and transfer motion in this breach-of-contract, unjust enrichment and ERISA1 case are: *262(1) Whether plaintiffs have alleged suffi- ' dent facts to hold a parent compan

ENTRY ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge. This matter, which relates to the scope of a surety’s obligations under a bond, is before the Court on the parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Specifically, the present dispute stems from a subcontractor and vendor’s allegations that they are entitled to payment under a bond executed by a surety. Currently, th

FIRST DIVISION BARNES, P. J., MERCIER and BROWN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules October 17, 2019

345 B.R. 261 (2006) In re James L. BAKER o/d/s K & L Associates, Inc. and Janice E. Baker o/d/s K & L Associates, Inc., Debtors. Daniel A. Hepner, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Americredit Financial Services Inc., Defendant/Appellant. In re William David Wilson and Cheryl Ann Wilson, Debtors. Charles C. Schlosser, Chapter 7 Trustee Plaintiff/Appellee, v. DaimlerChrysler Services Americas LLC, successor by m

Bethel, Judge. Sharon Ward and Pshone Ward appeal the denial of their motion for summary judgment, as well as the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of DirecTV LLC on the Wards’ claims seeking to recover for injury suffered by Sharon following the installation of a DirecTV satellite dish. The Wards argue that DirecTV is responsible for the negligence of its subcontract

In this workers' compensation case, Curtis Dale Holton petitioned this Court for certiorari review of the Court of Civil Appeals' judgment reversing the trial court's award of workers' compensation benefits. The trial court found that Holton was injured in the line and scope of his employment and that he is permanently and totally disabled. We granted Holton's petition; we reverse and remand. Curtis Dale Holton lives in West Monroe, Louisiana; he was 23 years old on the day of

20-3858-cv (L) PDVSA, et al. v. MUFG Union Bank, GLAS Americas In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ______________ August Term, 2021 (Argued: January 26, 2022 Decided: October 13, 2022) Docket Nos. 20-3858, 20-4127

Facts & Procedural History ¶1 Bob Berry, who resides in Tahlequah, Oklahoma, has been a nurseryman and businessman for more than fifty years. In the 1960s, Bob began working in the nursery business in Tahlequah, and in the early 1970s, he founded Midwestern Nursery. Bob grew and developed Midwestern Nursery, which later became American Nursery Products, and eventually took

Reversed and Remanded, and Majority and Concurring and Dissenting Opinions filed June 30, 2015. In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00352-CV BP OIL PIPELINE COMPANY, Appellant V. PLAINS PIPELINE, L.P., Appellee On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris C

OSCN Found Document:BERRY AND BERRY ACQUISITIONS v. BFN PROPERTIES BERRY AND BERRY ACQUISITIONS v. BFN PROPERTIES2018 OK 27Case Number: 114442Decided: 04/03/2018THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2018 OK 27, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS

OPINION TRACY CHRISTOPHER, Justice. This is an appeal of the trial court’s rulings on cross-motions for summary judgment by the successors of the parties to an asset and stock purchase agreement. The parties to this suit asked the trial court to render declaratory judgment interpreting the contract. The seller’s successor contends that the trial court er