⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Brown v. LT. MAXWELL”

Alaska Supreme Court · 2020-06-12 · Published · cited 2× · 465 P.3d 467
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.us. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ALASKA POLICE STANDARDS ) COUNCIL, ) Supreme Court No. S
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2025-02-13 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00103-CV ___________________________ MAKAYLA MONTOYA FRAZIER AND BUCKLE BUNNIES FUND, Appellants V. ZACH MAXWELL, Appellee On Appeal from the 355th District Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019-07-16 · Published · cited 2× · 929 F.3d 1030
SMITH, Chief Judge. Dijon Rasheed Brown was convicted of conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846, and for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violati
United States District Court · 2019-06-20 · Published · cited 4× · 390 F. Supp. 3d 337
The absence of available documentation describing the relationship between the Plaintiffs and the Technology Defendants and their owners does not overcome the compelling circumstantial evidence that the Plaintiffs have alleged suggesting the existence of an employer-employee relationship. Because the Plaintiffs adequately allege that Synergy, Rivero, ECO IQ, Neilitz, Migo IQ, Kotthoff, and Leese employed them pursuant to the FLSA, this Court denied all moti
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-15-00197-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/3/2015 5:06:22 PM Pam Estes
Aluli v. Brownpublic domain
District Court, D. Hawaii · 1977-09-15 · Published · cited 15× · 437 F. Supp. 602; 10 ERC 1765; 7 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20780; 10 ERC (BNA) 1765; 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13986
437 F.Supp. 602 (1977) Noa Emmett ALULI, Emma De Fries, Paul Fujishiro, Warren Mills Haynes, Jr., George Helm, Charles Kauluwehi Maxwell, Sr., Karl Anthony Mowat, Adrian Nacua, Kathryn B. Ochwat, Walter S. Ritte, Loretta Ritte, Herbert F. Santos, Richard W. Sawyer and Protect Kahoolawe Association, Plaintiffs, v. Harold BROWN, Secretary of Defense, W. Graham Claytor, Secretary of the Navy, James L. Holloway, Chief of Naval Operations, Ralph S. We
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2020-04-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-DR-01256-SCT JOSEPH PATRICK BROWN a/k/a PEANUT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/12/1994 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. FORREST A. JOHNSON, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: ADAMS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER: OFFICE OF CAPITAL POST-CONVICTION COUNSE
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001-09-14 · Published · cited 24× · 55 M.J. 375; 2001 CAAF LEXIS 1113; 2001 WL 1083396
Judge EFFRON delivered the opinion of the Court. A general court-martial composed of officer members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of one specification of disrespect toward a superior officer and six specifications of conduct unbecoming an officer, in violation of Articles 89 and 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 889 and 933. H
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000-07-13 · Published · cited 0×
REVISED, JULY 13, 2000 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-30134 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES HARVEY BROWN, also known as Jim Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middl
Kennedy v. Colvinpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2014-09-16 · Published · cited 0× · 45 F. Supp. 3d 950; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129033; 2014 WL 4629059
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Jeffrey D. Kennedy seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner) denying his applications for Social Security Disability benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income benefits (SSI) under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et
Simmonds v. Colvinpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013-07-19 · Published · cited 0× · 965 F. Supp. 2d 1060; 2013 WL 4048497; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112416
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge. Introduction Plaintiff Gramn Simmonds seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner) denying his application for disability insurance benefits (DIB) and supplemental security income (SSI) pursuant to Titles II and XVI of the Social Security
Miller v. Colvinpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013-05-07 · Published · cited 0× · 943 F. Supp. 2d 961; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64716; 2013 WL 1911292
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge. Dennis Miller seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying his application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3). Miller contends the administrative record (“AR”) does not contain substan
Newcomb v. Colvinpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013-03-06 · Published · cited 0× · 996 F. Supp. 2d 732; 2013 WL 7161466; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184909
ORDER LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge. Introduction Plaintiff Randy Newcomb seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying his application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) pursuant to Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g),
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2024-03-14 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF LOUISIANA * NO. 2023-KA-0497 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL DONALD J. REAUX * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FRO
State v. Farmerpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-07-22 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 Ohio 2616
[Cite as State v. Farmer, 2025-Ohio-2616.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACKSON COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Case No. 24CA4 Plaintiff-Appellee, : v. : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY LARRY E. FARMER
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025-08-22 · Published · cited 0×
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA ________________________________ Case No. 5D2024-0180 LT Case Nos. 2020-CA-16579 2020-CA-16581 ________________________________ ECIO RODRIGUES, Appellant, v. MATTHEW ANDERSON and JOSHUA ANDERSON, Appellees. _______________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020-12-03 · Published · cited 3× · 2020 Ohio 5512
[Cite as Fayak v. Univ. Hosps., 2020-Ohio-5512.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AMANDA FAYAK, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 109279 v. : UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, ET AL., : Defendants-Appellees. :
State v. Edwardspublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-02-27 · Published · cited 3× · 2025 Ohio 641
[Cite as State v. Edwards, 2025-Ohio-641.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 113793 v. : TIRRELL EDWARDS, :
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-06-30 · Published · cited 3× · 2017 Ohio 5725; 93 N.E.3d 1274
Delaney, P.J. {¶ 1} Appellant Michael R. Smithhisler appeals from the judgment entries of conviction and sentence entered in the Knox County Court of Common Pleas on August 22, 2016 and December 16, 2016. Appellee is the state of Ohio. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY {¶ 2} This case arose on September 16, 2015 when the Knox C
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014-12-11 · Published · cited 1× · 74 M.J. 542; 2014 CCA LEXIS 883; 2014 WL 6997856
*545 PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT Senior Judge FISCHER and Judge BRUBAKER concur. KING, Judge: A general court-martial, consisting of members with enlisted representation, convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of one specification each of attempt