Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Brown v. Krueger”
Brown v. Kruegerpublic domain
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Amy J. Fricano, J.), entered October 7, 2003. The order denied without prejudice the motion of defendants Deargate Homes Limited and Frank Mauro for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against defendant Frank Mauro. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Mem
Allen Brown v. Jeffrey E. Kruegerpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1952 ALLEN BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. JEFFREY E. KRUEGER, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
United States v. Kruegerpublic domain
EBEL, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from the district court’s order granting Defendant-Appellee Zachary Krueger’s motion to suppress evidence seized in Oklahoma pursuant to a warrant that was issued by a United States magistrate judge in Kansas. In granting Krueger’s motion, the district court concluded that suppression was necessary
State v. Kruegerpublic domain
Cuyahoga App. No. 93742, 2010-Ohio-3725. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
State v. Kruegerpublic domain
762 N.W.2d 114 (2008) 2008 WI App 162 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bryan James KRUEGER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2007AP2064-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Oral Argument August 7, 2008. Opinion Filed October 1, 2008. *115 On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause w
State v. Kruegerpublic domain
NADEAU, J. The defendant, Kyle Krueger, appeals his conviction following a jury trial in the Superior Court (Brennan, J.) on eighty counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault, see RSA 632-A:2 (1996), seven counts of attempted aggravated felonious sexual assault, see RSA 629:1 (1996), two counts of felonious sexual assault, see RSA 632-A:3 (1996), and one count of simple assault, see
M.K.K.I., Inc. v. Kruegerpublic domain
Kulik, J. ¶1 RCW 58.17.060 requires local governments to adopt regulations and procedures for the approval, alteration, and vacation of short plats. In 1999, Ricky and Christine Rose recorded two plats showing easements, following the procedures contained in Yakima County Code (YCC) chapter 14.12. Three years later, the Roses deeded one lot within the plats to M.K.K.I., Inc. (MKKI), without reference to any easement. Shortly bef
People v. Kruegerpublic domain
JUSTICE LUND delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant was charged with the unlawful possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, unlawful possession of a controlled substance, and unlawful possession of cannabis. (720 ILCS 570/401(a)(2)(A), 402(a)(2)(A), 550/4(b) (West 1992).) Defendant filed a motion to suppress all evidence of contraband found in the s
Matter of Estate of Kruegerpublic domain
529 N.W.2d 151 (1995) In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Diana C. KRUEGER, also known as Diana Krueger, Christina Krueger, Christina Diane Kruger, Christina Diane Krueger, Diana A. C. Krueger and Diana Aneta Christine Krueger, Deceased. William BIEBER, Rhinhold Bieber and Daniel Bieber, Petitioners and Appellees, v. Fred BIEBER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Diana C. Krueger, also known as Diana Krueger, Christina Krueger, Christina Di
Backhaus v. Kruegerpublic domain
126 Wis.2d 178 (1985) 376 N.W.2d 377 Floyd BACKHAUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rhonda L. KRUEGER, Hawkeye-Security Ins. Co., a foreign corporation, and Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co., a domestic corporation, Defendant, Hubert J. KREUSER and the Home Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Defendants-Respondents.[] No. 84-1611. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.</
Brown v. Gattipublic domain
248 P.3d 18 (2011) 240 Or. App. 519 Timothy M. BROWN, M.D.; and Timothy M. Brown, M.D., P.C., an Oregon professional corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Daniel J. GATTI; Gatti, Gatti, Maier, Krueger, & Associates, an Oregon partnership; Gatti, Gatti, Maier, Krueger, Sayer, & Associates, an Oregon partnership; and Gatti & Gatti, P.C., an Oregon professional corporation, Defendants-Respondents, and Marie No
Krueger v. Devinepublic domain
18 Mass. App. Ct. 397 (1984) 466 N.E.2d 133 MARGARET H. KRUEGER & others[1] vs. WILLIAM J. DEVINE & others.[2] Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Dukes County. March 14, 1984. July 23, 1984. Present: BROWN, KASS, & SMITH, JJ. Paul J. Driscoll for William J. Devine. John T. Ronayne (
United States v. Sanford-Brown, Limitedpublic domain
MANION, Circuit Judge. This matter is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court for re *447 consideration in light of its recent decision in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 1989, 195 L.Ed.2d 348 (2016). See U.S. ex re
Krueger v. Grinnell Mut. Reinsurance Co.public domain
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice [¶ 1.] Steven and Coralee Krueger filed a complaint against Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. (Grinnell) alleging failure to pay underinsured motorist benefits. The Kruegers served written discovery requests on Grinnell. Grinnell responded but raised several objections. The Kruegers wrote a letter demanding answers to certain discovery requests within a week. Gri
United States v. Sanford-Brown, Limitedpublic domain
MANION, Circuit Judge. Brent Nelson spent six months as the Director of Education at Sanford-Brown College, a for-profit educational institution located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. After he resigned, Nelson initiated this suit under the False Claims Act. Based on its receipt of federal subsidies from the U.S. Department of Education, Nelson alleges that the college’s recruiting and r
United States v. Kruegerpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MONTI L. BELOT, District Judge. This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to suppress. (Doc. 11). The motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for decision. (Doc. 13). The court held an evidentiary hearing on February 6, 2013. I. Facts In May 2013, Rick Moore, a special agent with Homeland Security (HSI), received a
State Of Washington, Resp V. Eric Lee Krueger, Apppublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 83899-7-I Respondent, ORDER GRANTING v. MOTION TO PUBLISH ERIC LEE KRUEGER, Appellant. Respondent State of Washington moved for publication of the opinion filed on October 23, 2023. Appellant Eric Krue
Kem v. Kruegerpublic domain
OPINION Suit was instituted by David Krueger against appellant Kenneth Kem and one Tip Johnson d/b/a Johnson Excavation Company for damages done to real property owned by appellee. The allegation was that the defendants, using bull dozers, wood cutting crews and excavation machinery trespassed upon the property, destroying the natural timber, undergrowth, topsoil and contour of the property. The suit claimed that defendant Johnson was the agent of defendant Kem at the
Krueger v. Tippettpublic domain
229 P.3d 866 (2010) Nancy E. KRUEGER, Appellant, v. Jack W. TIPPETT and Blanche M. Tippett, husband and wife, Respondents. No. 27791-7-III. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3. March 18, 2010. *867 David Allan Gittins, Attorney at Law, Clarkston, WA, for Appellant. Thomas L. Ledgerwood, Attorney at Law, Clarkston, W
State ex rel. Stewart v. Kruegerpublic domain
[Cite as State ex rel. Stewart v. Krueger, 2017-Ohio-8048.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, ex rel., : JUDGES: CHRISTOPHER STEWART : Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. : Hon. John W. Wise, J. R