Cases

OPINION AND ORDER PATRICK J. DUGGAN, District Judge. This case involves the tragic death of an infant child named Miranda Henry while she was in the custody of a foster parent. The child’s natural father, Marvin Brown, brought this action on behalf of his deceased daughter against the foster parent, Defendant Dana Hatch, as well as the child placement agency, Defendant Starr Commonwealth (colle

WOOD (Fred B.), J. The attorney general has appealed from that portion of the decree of final distribution1 which awarded the heirs one-fourth of the residue of the testatrix’ estate, leaving intact the portion thereof which awarded three-fourths of the residue to three charitable organizations2 selected and designated by the court, one-fourth to each of the three chariti

SPENCE, J. This is an appeal by the attorney general from an order denying his petition to determine heirship. (Prob. Code, § 1080.) He previously attacked this ruling in a mandamus proceeding, contending that the superior court sitting in probate had erroneously failed to take jurisdiction of the heirship issue. We held that the court had acted in disposition of that issue when it determined that the “attorney general [had] no s

GORSUCH, Circuit Judge. The Hatch Valley may be to chiles what the Napa Valley is to grapes. Whether it’s the soil, the desert’s dry heat, or the waters of the Rio Grande, the little town of Hatch, New Mexico, and its surroundings produce some of the world’s finest chile peppers. Just ask any of the 30,000 people

102 P.3d 774 (2004) 2004 UT App 378 Julian Dean HATCH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Larry DAVIS, Defendant and Appellee. No. 20020778-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. October 28, 2004. Rehearing Denied December 28, 2004. *776 Budge W. Call, Bond & Call LC, Salt Lake City, for Appellant.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA LUKE HATCH, No. 83307 Appellant, vs. FILED KAYCE HATCH, Respondent. AUG 2 2 2022 ELIZABETH A.

2025 UT App 132 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. RYAN SCOTT HATCH, Appellant. Opinion No. 20230324-CA Filed August 28, 2025 Sixth District Court, Kanab Department The Honorable Mandy Larsen

Opinion BROWN, J. The primary issue before us is whether the constitutional prohibitions against double jeopardy bar retrial after a dismissal under section 1385 of the Penal Code.1 We conclude they do not under the facts of this case. Factual and Procedural Background Defendant Daniel William Hat

Campney v Hatch (2024 NY Slip Op 03574) Campney v Hatch 2024 NY Slip Op 03574 Decided on July 3, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Supreme Court OF NEVADA CLERK’S ORDER hy 1947) eR IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MICHAEL EDWARD HATCH, AN No. 83692 INDIVIDUAL; AND ALISHA SUZANNE HATCH, AN INDIVIDUAL, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, E ae iLED KARI ANNE JOHNSON, Respondent/Cross-Appellant. APR 25 2022 ELIZABETH A, BROWN CLERK GF SUPREME COURT a ti DEPUTY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, this appeal and cross-appeal are d

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. On April 27, 2000, Plaintiff Richard Hatch was arrested by the Middletown, Rhode Island police department and charged with assaulting his adopted son (“John Doe”). 1 There was immediate media interest in the arrest due to Hatch’s impending television appearance on the reality game show Surv

12/03/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs October 1, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAYLON HATCH Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County Nos. 21-00250, 21-00645 James Jones, Jr., Judge No. W2023-01764-CCA-R3-CD The Defen

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER CLARK WADDOUPS, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Prior to November 1950, members of the State Board of Education (“Board”) were appointed rather than elected. In 1950, however, voters elected to amend the Utah Constitution to require that Board members be elected. The State then implemented a non-partisan procedure whereby candidates were select

OPINION BOSSON, Chief Justice. {1} Pursuant to a reduction in force (RIF) arising from a district-wide financial shortfall, Plaintiff Cari I. Aguilera, a certified arts teacher with the Hatch Valley Schools, was discharged during the term of her contract. Under the New Mexico School Personnel Act, a certified teacher may only be discharged for “just cause,” NMSA 1978, §

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. James Hatch was convicted of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (1988), and of carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (1988). Hatch was sentenced to one month on the section 2113(a) violation, after a downward *363

Egan Jr., J. Cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court (Nolan Jr., J.), entered November 29, 2010 in Saratoga County, which, among other things, denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and denied cross motions by defendants William Hatch and Evan Hatch for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. In or about October 2007, utilizing skills he acquired from a YouTube video,

Egan Jr., J. Cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court (Nolan Jr., J.), entered November 29, 2010 in Saratoga County, which, among other things, denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and denied cross motions by defendants William Hatch and Evan Hatch for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. In or about October 2007, utilizing skills he acquired from a YouTube video,

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 12, 2013 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker

773 F.Supp.2d 1070 (2011) Carl CASE, Petitioner, v. Tim HATCH, Warden, Guadalupe County Correctional Facility, Respondent. No. 08-CV-0542 MV/WDS. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. March 28, 2011. *1071 Todd A. Coberly, Peter Schoenburg, Marc M. Lowry, for Petitioner. Margaret E. McLean, for Respondent. Ja

ORDER TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge. This matter is before the court on the appellee’s Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Bane. We also have a response from the appellant. Upon consideration by the judges assigned to this appeal originally, the petition for panel rehearing is granted in part to the extent of the amendments found in the Opinion now attached to this order. The petiti