Cases

Id. , Ex. C ("2017 TOS"), ECF 25-2. Section 13(G) in turn states: G. Future changes to Dispute Resolution Agreement. If Google makes any changes to this Dispute Resolution Agreement (other than a change to Google's Notice Address), Customer or Advertiser may reject any such change by notifying Goog

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge More than two million people apply for positions at Google each year, making Google's hiring process as daunting as that of an Ivy League school.1 This case involves approximately 265 applicants who were ages 40 and older when they interviewed in-person for certain engineering positions at Google and were denied employment. Rather than simply losing the

Garland, Chief Judge: Fourteen locksmith companies allege that Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! have conspired to "flood the market" of online search results with information about so-called "scam" locksmiths, in order to extract additional advertising revenue. Am. Compl. ¶ 36. According to the amended complaint, the defendants further this scheme by publishing the content of scam locksmit

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE DECLARATION OF DAVID KLAUSNER Blackburn, J. This matter is before me on Defendant Microsoft Corporation’s Motion To Strike Declaration of David Klausner [# 309]1 filed March 1, 2013. The plaintiff *1191filed a response [#315], and Microsoft filed a reply [# 316]. I deny the motion.

631 F.3d 1372 (2011) ILOR, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 2010-1117, 2010-1172. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. January 11, 2011. *1373 David E. Schmit, Frost Brown Todd LLC, of Cincinnati, OH, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Frank E. Scherkenbach, Fish & Richardson

LINN, Circuit Judge. iLOR, LLC (“iLOR”) appeals from a judgment of the U.S. District Court’for the Eastern District of Kentucky, iLOR, LLC v. Google, Inc., No. 5:07-CV-109, Doc. 71, 2007 WL 4259586 (E.D.Ky. Nov. 30, 2007), which dismissed the “action” with prejudice after the district court denied iLOR’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief on claim 26 of

O'Malley, Circuit Judge. *1185 This copyright case returns to us after a second jury trial, this one focusing on the defense of fair use. Oracle America, Inc. ("Oracle") filed suit against Google Inc. ("Google") 1 in the United

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PATRICIA L. BAKER v. Civil No. 23-2013 (CKK) GOOGLE LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (July 26, 2024) Plaintiff Patricia Baker, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint against Defendant Google LLC (“Google”), seeking $2,50

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 617–622 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 18, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PATRICK CALHOUN; ELAINE No. 22-16993 CRESPO; MICHAEL HENRY; CORNICE WILSON; RODNEY D.C. No. 4:20-cv- JOHNSON; CLAUDIA KINDLER, 05146-YGR Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION v. GOOGLE, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 6 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DREAMSTIME.COM, LLC, No. 20-16472 Plaintiff-Appellant,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: Google Play Store Antitrust No. 24-6256 Litigation D.C. Nos. ______________________________ 3:21-md-02981-JD _ 3:20-cv-05671-JD EPIC GAMES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, OPINION Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GOOGLE LLC; GOOGL

Filed 12/05/2022 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PRAGER UNIVERSITY, H047714 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 19CV340667) v. GOOGLE LLC et al., Defendants and Respondents. After

In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: February 15, 2022 S21G0798. EDIBLE IP, LLC v. GOOGLE, LLC. MCMILLIAN, Justice. This case involves Google LLC’s application of internet search algorithms, which it uses to auction off search terms for profit to advertisers, and the interests of Edible IP, LLC, which seeks to exercise control over the profit generated from its trade name and associated goodwill. In 2018, Edible IP brought an ac

NUMBER 13-23-00114-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG GOOGLE LLC, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 377TH DISTRICT COURT OF VICTORIA COUNTY,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PRAGER UNIVERSITY, No. 18-15712 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 5:17-cv-06064- LHK GOOGLE LLC, FKA Google, Inc.; YOUTUBE, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,

Lourie, Circuit Judge. SimpleAir, Inc. ("SimpleAir") appeals from the order of the United States District *1163 Court for the Eastern District of Texas dismissing SimpleAir's complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) as barred by claim preclusion and the Kessler doctrine.

EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge This matter is a dispute over a contract for online advertising. Defendant Google LLC connects companies that seek to advertise their goods or services with the publishers of webpages that wish to make a profit by placing ads on their webpages. Plaintiffs eOnline Global, Inc., Sonoran Online Marketing, LLC, and Four Peaks Online Marketing, LLC (collectively "Plaintiffs") are website pu

ACCEPTED 15-24-00087-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/10/2025 9:53 AM