Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Brown v. City of Markham”
Chavez v. Markhampublic domain
256 Kan. 859 (1995) CARLOS CHAVEZ, Appellee, v. MICHAEL D. MARKHAM, Appellant. No. 70,287 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed January 27, 1995. Paul Hasty, Jr., of Wallace, Saunders, Austin, Brown and Enochs, Chartered, of Overland Park, argued the cause, and Karen A. Seymour, of the same firm, was with him on the briefs for appellee. Leo
Chavez v. Markhampublic domain
19 Kan. App. 2d 702 (1994) 875 P.2d 997 CARLOS CHAVEZ, Appellee, v. MICHAEL D. MARKHAM, Appellant. No. 70,287 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed June 10, 1994. Paul Hasty, Jr., and Karen A. Seymour, of Wallace, Saunders, Austin, Brown and Enochs, Chartered, of Overland Park, for appellant. Leo L. Logan, of B
Texas Department of Transportation v. Naomi Markhampublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-18-00812-CV TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellant v. Naomi MARKHAM, Carrie Markham, and Trevor Markham, Individually and as the Administrator of th
Rosemond v. Markhampublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Gregory F. Van Tatenhové, United States District Judge ’ For nearly forty years, John Rosemond has written a newspaper column on parenting. No other newspaper column written by a single author has run longer. Now, in an exercise of regulatory zeal, the Kentucky Board of Examiners of Psychology seeks to prohibit Rosemond from publishing his column in Kentucky
Markham v. Wolfpublic domain
OPINION Justice TODD. In this interlocutory appeal, we consider whether state legislators have standing to intervene in a challenge to the issuance of an executive order concerning direct care health workers. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that, in these circumstances, they do not because the legislators’ interests purportedly impacted by the executive order do not involve unique legis
Markham v. Kodiak Island Borough Bd. of Equal.public domain
CARNEY, Justice. *946I. INTRODUCTION In 2013 and 2014 attorney Gerald Markham applied for a senior citizen tax exemption on his residential property in Kodiak. The Borough assessor denied the applications due to Markham's prolonged absences from Alaska. When given the opportunity to prove his absences were allo
Thompson v. Markhampublic domain
SWANSON, J. Appellant seeks review of a summary final judgment entered in favor of appel-lees in their action to quiet title to real property based on a tax deed; Because genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether notice of the tax deed sale satisfied due process under the circumstances, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. Appellant acquired title to real property in Columbia County
White v. City Of Markhampublic domain
310 F.3d 989 Brian WHITE and Quentin McClinton, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY OF MARKHAM, Erik Lymore, Markham Chief of Police, Officer Muldrow, Markham Police, Star # 525, and Claudette Brooks Witcher, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-2034. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 13, 2002. Decided November 13, 2002.
City of Dallas v. Arredondopublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of
White, Brian v. City Markhampublic domain
MANION, Circuit Judge. Brian White and his son Quentin McClinton lived in a house owned by Brian’s aunt, Claudette Brooks Witcher, under an oral agreement. During a verbal altercation with his aunt, White called the police for assistance. Officer Kenneth Muldrow of the Markham Police Department arrived on the scene and, after determining that Witcher was the owner of the residen
10/20/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 11, 2020 Session CANDACE RENEA CAVNESS HOWARD (BEASLEY) v. BRECK MARKHAM BEASLEY Appeal from the Chancery Court for Tipton County No. 27855 William C. Cole, Chancellor ___________________
Department of Education v. Brownpublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 551–569 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 30, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Brown v. Knapppublic domain
156 F.Supp.2d 732 (2001) James BROWN, Plaintiff, v. James KNAPP, individually and as a Markham Police Officer, Other unnamed Markham Police Officers, and the City of Markham, Defendants. No. 98 C 7754. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 29, 2001. *733 Gigi Ann Gilbert, Law Offices of Gigi Gilbert
State v. Markhampublic domain
63 S.W.3d 701 (2002) STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John Thomas MARKHAM, Defendant-Appellant. No. 24021. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District. Division Two. January 10, 2002. *702 Amy M. Bartholow, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbia, for appellant. *703 Jeremiah W. (Jay) Ni
Myers-Woodward, LLC v. Underground Services Markham, LLC and United Brine Pipeline Company LLCpublic domain
NUMBER 13-20-00172-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MYERS-WOODWARD, LLC, Appellant, v. UNDERGROUND SERVICES MARKHAM, LLC, AND UNITED BRINE PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC, Appellees. On appeal from the
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00156-CV ___________________________ ARLINGTON PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1329; DAVID CROW; SHAWN GRAHAM; JOSEPH MARKHAM; EDWARD MONTAGUE; MATTHEW THRONE; AND ADRIAN ROJAS, A
Doe v. Markhampublic domain
The plaintiff John Doe1 appeals from the trial court's August 19, 1998, order requiring remittitur of a punitive-damages award to $10,000. We reverse and remand. John Doe is a physician whose medical practice is limited to a particular specialty. Beginning about April 1995, Earby S. Markham began writing false statements about Doe on the restroom walls of two state parks and a hotel located in Baldwin County. Doe learned about
Brown v. City of Lauderhillpublic domain
654 So.2d 302 (1995) Lorenzar BROWN and David Kaminsky, Appellants, v. CITY OF LAUDERHILL, a municipal corporation, Appellee. No. 94-0743. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. May 10, 1995. Anthony J. Titone, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants. Stuart R. Michelson and Andrew S. Maurodis of Law Offices of Stuart R. Michelson, Bay Harbor Islands,
Chong Yim v. City of Seattlepublic domain
/wmE\ yTIN CLERKS OFFICE X This opinion was 'pjppFMPeoigCT.SIXtECFVaA^^ filed for record DATE ' 1 4" ' ^ CHIEF Susan L. Carlson Supreme Court Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHI
Kansas City v. Markhampublic domain
This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Jackson County refusing to revoke its order appointing a receiver inlimine in an injunction suit. Pending this appeal, the defendants in a companion case, Kansas City, respondent, v. Leak et al., No. 33031, brought in this court a proceeding in prohibition against the circuit judge, and the ancillary receiver appointed by him, to regain the possession of property of the defendants which the receiver had seized un