⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Brooks v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office”

District Court, E.D. California · 2011-07-05 · Published · cited 5× · 275 F.R.D. 528; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71507; 2011 WL 2636405
ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, United States Magistrate Judge. Previously pending on this court’s law and motion calendar for June 23, 2011, was plaintiffs’ motion to compel production of documents. Benjamin Nisenbaum appeared for plaintiffs. Brent Jo appeared for defendants. After reviewing the joint statement and hearing oral argument, the court now issues the following order. BACKGR
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-02-19 · Published · cited 34× · 129 F.4th 790
Appellate Case: 23-1135 Document: 130-1 Date Filed: 02/19/2025Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH February 19, 2025 UNITED STATES COU
District Court, N.D. California · 2014-02-10 · Published · cited 38× · 26 F. Supp. 3d 925; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17589; 2014 WL 556008
ORDER Docket 46, 47 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, United States District Judge Curtis D. Williams (“Plaintiff’) brings the instant civil rights action against the County of Alameda (the “County”) and six law enforcement officers1 alleging various claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arising out of a warrantless entry into his residence. See Dkt. 44.
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985-02-21 · Published · cited 29× · 696 P.2d 724; 144 Ariz. 172; 1985 Ariz. App. LEXIS 458
144 Ariz. 172 (1985) 696 P.2d 724 CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, and the Honorable Robert L. Myers, a Judge thereof; and Maricopa County, a body politic, and Jerry I. Hill, Sheriff of Maricopa County, the real parties in interest, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1 CA-CIV 7509.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022-12-30 · Published · cited 65× · 57 F.4th 791
USCA11 Case: 18-13592 Document: 304-1 Date Filed: 12/30/2022 Page: 1 of 150 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-13592 ____________________ DREW ADAMS, a minor, by and th
Washington Supreme Court · 2006-07-26 · Published · cited 69× · 138 P.3d 963; 158 Wash. 2d 1
138 P.3d 963 (2006) Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian; Peter Ilgenfritz and David Shull; Johanna Bender and Sherri Kokx; Janet Helson and Betty Lundquist; David Serkin-Poole and Michael Serkin-Poole; Vegavahini Subramaniam and Vaijayanthimala Nagarajan; Elizabeth Reis and Barbara Steele; and Michelle Esguerra; and Boo Torres De Esguera, Respondents, v. KING COUNTY; Ron Sims, King County Executive; and Dean Logan, King County Director of Recor
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988-05-19 · Published · cited 1× · 157 Ariz. 497; 759 P.2d 643; 13 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 48; 1988 Ariz. App. LEXIS 234
BROOKS, Presiding Judge. This is an appeal from a juvenile court order terminating the parent-child relationship between appellant and his daughter. Four issues are raised: 1. Whether the juvenile court erred in denying appellant’s motion to continue the termination hearing; 2. Whether the juvenile court erred in granting a motion for protective order which prev
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969-08-06 · Published · cited 10× · 457 P.2d 956; 10 Ariz. App. 243; 1969 Ariz. App. LEXIS 565
10 Ariz. App. 243 (1969) 457 P.2d 956 ANONYMOUS, a Minor, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF PIMA; Honorable Jack G. Marks, Judge of the Superior Court, acting as Juvenile Judge, Respondents. No. 2 CA-CIV 710. Court of Appeals of Arizona. August 6, 1969. Rehearing Denied September 5, 1969.
Griffin v. Arpaiopublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-03-05 · Published · cited 371× · 557 F.3d 1117; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 4818; 2009 WL 539982
557 F.3d 1117 (2009) Jermaine Donte GRIFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joe ARPAIO, in his individual and official capacity as Sheriff of Maricopa County; Dheerendranath V. Raikhelkar Dr., in his individual and official capacity, also known as Raikeuian; Brooks, RN, in individual and official capacity; Rivera, RN, in PGR individual and official capacity; John Doe No.1, in his individual and official capacity as Jail Commander at Madison Street Jail;
District Court, S.D. California · 2018-09-18 · Published · cited 2× · 341 F. Supp. 3d 1129
Plaintiffs counter that, had the magistrate judge known the following facts, no search warrant would have issued. (Opp'n 8.) First, Plaintiffs point out that they provided Defendant Clark with all their marijuana recommendations two months prior to the affidavit. Second, that Defendant Clark was in constant contact with Plaintiffs' counsel; third, that Clark had advised Plaintiffs' counsel that the collective was in full compliance with state law. (Id.<
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012-08-29 · Published · cited 4961× · 693 F.3d 896
Opinion by Judge BYBEE; Dissent by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent by Judge TALLMAN. OPINION BYBEE, Circuit Judge: This § 1983 case concerns allegations of unlawful conduct by officials in the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office (“MCSO”) and the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office (“MCAO”), conduct which culminated in the late-night arrests of Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin, owners of the Ph
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-02-27 · Published · cited 11× · 951 F.3d 1001
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-10448 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:16-cr-01012-SRB-1 JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-09-16 · Published · cited 12× · 117 F.4th 1130
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COLE JOSEPH SPENCER, No. 21-15521 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:20-cv-00385- DGC-CDB AARON PEW, #19183, police officer; JACOB ROZEMA, #15724, police officer; KEVIN SHALL, #1554, deputy sheriff; JUSTIN MACKLIN, OPINION #1742, deputy sheriff; MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF’S
Donahoe v. Arpaiopublic domain
District Court, D. Arizona · 2013-12-05 · Published · cited 0× · 986 F. Supp. 2d 1091; 2013 WL 6327992
ORDER NEIL V. WAKE, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY OF RULINGS.............................................1101 II. LEGAL STANDARD..................................................1102 III. STAPLEYI...........................................................1103 A. Legal standard.......................................
Griffin v. Arpaiopublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-03-05 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JERMAINE DONTE GRIFFIN,  Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOE ARPAIO, in his individual and official capacity as Sheriff of Maricopa County; DHEERENDRANATH V. RAIKHELKAR Dr., in his individual and official No. 06-16132 capacity, also known as Raikeuian; D.C. No. BROOKS, RN, in individual and  CV-01-01290-PHX- officia
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2019-02-28 · Published · cited 4× · 372 F. Supp. 3d 389
JANE TRICHE MILAZZO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *401Before the Court is Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 63). For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART . BACKGROUND At its core, this lawsuit alleges that the Orleans Parish District Attorney's
Tinsley v. McKaypublic domain
District Court, D. Arizona · 2015-09-29 · Published · cited 5× · 156 F. Supp. 3d 1024; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180613; 2015 WL 9690914
ORDER Honorable Roslyn O. Silver, Senior United States District Judge Plaintiffs, minors in the custody of the Arizona foster. care system, allege widespread systemic failures in state child welfare agencies “expos[e] them to ... physical and emotional harm and unreasonable risk of harm” in violation of their constitutional rights. (Doc. 37 at 2). Defendants moved the Court abstain and dismiss the seco
S.A. v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2018-12-10 · Published · cited 0× · 363 F. Supp. 3d 1048
LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge *1053TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1053 STATEMENT...1056 1. The Immigration and Nationality Act and Parole Generally...1056 2. The Complaint...1056 2.1 September-December 2014: The Creation of the CAM Parole
Nelson v. Lottpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018-07-24 · Published · cited 5× · 330 F. Supp. 3d 1314
C. Lynwood Smith, Jr., United States District Judge Randy Nelson died as a result of his encounter with two Athens, Alabama police officers in the Emergency Room of the Athens-Limestone County Hospital on February 3, 2016. The Second Amended Complaint filed by Dorothy Nelson, the mother and Administrator Ad Litem of Randy Nelson's estate, alleged eight claims against four defendants: i.e. , (1) a claim under
District Court, W.D. New York · 2011-09-12 · Published · cited 4× · 811 F. Supp. 2d 667; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102145; 2011 WL 4014310
DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. INTRODUCTION This long-running case has its origins in a series of disputes between plaintiff Brook Chambery (“Chambery”) and state and federal regulatory authorities over the operation of Beechwood Restorative Care Center (“Beechwood”), a nursing home owned by Chambery and his mother Olive Chambery (collectively “the Cham