Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Brooks v. Berryhill (CONSENT)”
Frederick v. Berryhillpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ABBIE CRITES-LEONI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Michael Frederick brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the Social Security Administration Commissioner’s denial of his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Act.</
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 25, 2011 Session JANICE BROOKS, ET AL. v. RIVERTOWN ON THE ISLAND HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION, INC. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-10-1088-2 Arnold B. Goldin, Chancellor No. W2011-00326-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 6, 2011 Appellee f
Brooks v. Statepublic domain
244 Ga. 574 (1979) 261 S.E.2d 379 BROOKS v. THE STATE. 34813. Supreme Court of Georgia. Argued May 15, 1979. Decided October 30, 1979. William S. Cain, Jr., for appellant. William J. Smith, District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Daryl A. Robinson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.<
Flinton v. Comm'r of Soc. SEC.public domain
23-7715-cv Flinton v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ___________________________________________ August Term, 2024 Argued: December 4, 2024 Decided: July 2, 2025 Docket No. 23-7715-cv
Roderick Talley v. State of Arkansaspublic domain
Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 461 Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Date: 2021-07-15 10:25:54 DIVISION II Foxit PhantomPDF Version: No. CR-20-134 9.7.5 OPINION DELIVERED: OCTOBER 7, 2020 RODERICK TALLEY
Cook v. Hardingpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS [44, 46, 54, 60] OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE , I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Melissa Kay Cook (“Cook”), individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for *925Babies A, B, and C, ■brings suit against Governor Jerry Brown, Karen Smith (Director and State Public Health Officer
James v. City of Russellvillepublic domain
Jerry James appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the City of Russellville in a breach-of-contract and fraud action. We affirm. On September 5, 2002, James filed a five-count complaint against the City of Russellville ("the City") arising out of the City's alleged refusal to allow him to locate manufactured homes in certain residential districts within the municipality based on the City's interpretation of its then-existing zoning ordinance. On August 10, 2003, wh
11/15/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 19, 2017 Session MICHAEL JOSEPH CREWS HENSLEY v. SHELLIE NICOLE BOUMA HENSLEY Appeal from the General Sessions Court for Campbell County No. 15138 Amanda H. Sammons, Judge
10/21/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 6, 2022 Session E. JOSEPH ROBINSON, II, ET AL. V. NELLE POWELL WILLIAMS MAHAFFEY ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Bedford County No. 32139 J.B. Cox, Chancellor
People v. Alvarezpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FRANCISCO JAY ALVAREZ, Defendant and Appellant. S089619 Kern County Superior Court 68352A August 18, 2025 Justice Groban authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Corrigan, Liu, Kr
Sammons v. Statepublic domain
612 S.E.2d 785 (2005) 279 Ga. 386 SAMMONS v. The STATE. No. S05A0070. Supreme Court of Georgia. May 9, 2005. Reconsideration Denied June 6, 2005. *786 Brian Steel, Atlanta, for Appellant. *787 Richard Ashley Mallard, Dist. Atty., Thurbert E. Bake
Kimber Keplinger Bastone v. James Michael Bastonepublic domain
04/30/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 26, 2021 Session KIMBER KEPLINGER BASTONE v. JAMES MICHAEL BASTONE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 13D114 John B. Bennett, Judge No. E2020-00711-COA-
True the Vote, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Servicepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) TRUE THE VOTE, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-734 (RBW) ) INTERN
True the Vote, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Servicepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) TRUE THE VOTE, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-734 (RBW) ) INTER
United States v. Iev, Juvenile Malepublic domain
Opinion by Judge N.R. SMITH; Dissent by Chief Judge KOZINSKI. OPINION N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Where an officer reasonably believes that “the persons with whom he is dealing may be armed and presently dangerous,” the officer may conduct a frisk or *433“pat-down” search of that person. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 30, 88
Chelsea Samantha Barnes v. Daniel Adam Barnespublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 27, 2012 Session CHELSEA SAMANTHA BARNES v. DANIEL ADAM BARNES Appeal from the Chancery Court of Cheatham County No. 14713 Robert E. Burch, Judge No. M2011-01824-COA-R3-CV - Filed: October 24, 2012 This is a divorce appe
Fredericks v. United Statespublic domain
Indian breaeh-of-trast ease; standing of heirs to challenge BIA’s actions respecting estate assets; motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim; RCFC 12(b)(6); time of vesting of heirs’ property interests; BIA’s money-mandating fiduciary duties in entering and approving leases of Indian agricultural lands and mineral rights OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge.
Sirva Relocation, LLC v. Golar Richiepublic domain
SELYA, Circuit Judge. In Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), the Supreme Court enunciated a doctrine of abstention. Fidelity to that doctrine requires federal courts, in the absence of extraordinary circumstances, to refrain from interfering with certain state proceedings. See id. at 43-45, 91 S.Ct. 746. Th
United States v. Iev, Juvenile Malepublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , No. 11-10337 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:11-cr-00929- DCB-JJM-1 I.E.V., JUVENILE MALE, Defendant - Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States Di
Crowley v. Crowleypublic domain
708 N.E.2d 42 (1999) Mark D. CROWLEY, Appellant-Petitioner, v. Laura R. CROWLEY, Appellee-Respondent. No. 34A04-9712-CV-514. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 30, 1999. *45 Dan J. May, Kokomo, Attorney for Appellant. Monty K. Woolsey, Miroff, Cross & Klineman, Indianapolis, Attorney for Appellee.