Cases

15 Wn. App. 168 (1976) 547 P.2d 1234 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. RANDALL LAWRENCE SHERMAN, Respondent. No. 1535-3. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three. March 24, 1976. Donald C. Brockett, Prosecuting Attorney, and James M. Parkins, Deputy, for appellant. Richard Cease, Public Defender, and

758 F.Supp. 1244 (1991) Robert Ian SHERMAN, for himself and as natural guardian for Richard Harry Sherman, a minor son, Plaintiffs, v. COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 21 OF WHEELING TOWNSHIP, Lloyd Descarpentrie, School District Superintendent, and Dr. Ferne Garrett, Principal of Riley School, individually and as representatives of the State of Illinois, and Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, Defendants.

The City of Sherman (City) and Greater Texoma Municipal Utility District (Texoma), petitioners, filed this action under the Declaratory Judgment Act, article 2524-1,1 against the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC) and Luella Water Supply Corporation (Luella), respondents. The purpose of the suit was to determine if the PUC has jurisdiction to prohibit, condition, control or otherwise regulate the groundwater development activiti

127 F.3d 839 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7867, 97 Daily JournalD.A.R. 12,688Bill JONES, Secretary of the State of California, Defendant-Appellant,andPeter F. Schabarum; Lewis K. Uhler, Intervenors-Appellants,v.Tom BATES; Edward H. Lyman; Richard D. Lewis; Lawrence J.Buchalter; Jonathan Browning; Rachel Sherman,Plaintiffs-Appellees,andNATIONAL TAX LIMITATION COMMITTEE; Alliance of CaliforniaTaxpayers &a;

OPINION ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice In Spir Star AG v. Kimich1 the Texas Supreme Court upheld the exercise of jurisdiction over a German hose manufacturer which had sold one of its hoses to a wholly owned Texas subsidiary, who in turn sold it to a Texas end user, where it was alleged to have failed and caused injury. In this case, we are presented wit

MEMORANDUM OPINION Lewis A. Kaplan, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on trueEX’s and truePTS’s (collectively, “plaintiffs”) motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent MarkitSERV Limited and MarkitSERV, LLC (collectively, “MarkitSERV”) from barring plaintiffs’ ac*709cess to certain of MarkitSERV’s technology and software.

ACCEPTED 01-17-00626-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs brought suit against the-County of Alameda (“County”), alleging that the County’s regulation of billboards and advertising signs is unconstitutional. See generally Compl. (dkt. 1). Plaintiffs now move for a preliminary injunction, claiming that the County’s comprehensive zoning law, codifie

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1440 Doc: 123 Filed: 05/08/2024 Pg: 1 of 37 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1440 LONNIE BILLARD, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHARLOTTE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL; MECKLENBURG AR

Opinion issued December 15, 2020 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00208-CV ——————————— THE HONORABLE ERIC HAGSTETTE, HONORABLE JOSEPH LICATA, III, AND THE HONORABLE JIM WALLACE, Appellants

ACCEPTED 03-14-00552-CV 5424083 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUST

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA KAREN FANN, ET AL. Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. STATE OF ARIZONA, ET AL. Defendants/Appellees. INVEST IN ARIZONA, ET AL. Intervenors/Appellees. No. CV-21-0058-T/AP Filed August 19, 2021

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: An Abbey of the Benedictine Order of the Catholic Church challenges as unconstitutional rules issued by the Louisiana Board of Funeral Directors granting funeral homes an exclusive right to sell caskets. The district court enjoined their enforcement, finding that they deny equal protection and due process of law. We will AFFIRM the judgmen

Justice Willett, delivered the opinion of the Court. Many university campuses remain abuzz during the summer months, hosting various sports and other extracurricular camps for kids and teens. This property-tax dispute poses a question of first impression: whether a dormitory-like facility owned by a “higher education facility authority” forfeits its statutory p

Case: 11-30756 Document: 00512029979 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/23/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 23, 2012 No. 11-30756 Lyle W. Cay

Case: 24-60509 Document: 62-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/20/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED November 20, 2025

ACCEPTED 03-14-00774-CV 7568136 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

622 F.3d 1202 (2010) POWELL'S BOOKS, INC.; Old Multnomah Book Store, Ltd., DBA Annie Bloom's Books; Dark Horse Comics, Inc.; Colette's: Good Food + Hungry Minds, LLC; Bluejay, Inc., DBA Paulina Springs Books; St. John's Booksellers, LLC; American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression; Association of American Publishers, Inc.; Freedom To Read Foundation, Inc.; Comic Book Legal Defense Fund, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and American Civil Liberties Unio

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00002-CV Texas Court Reporters Certification Board and Michele Henricks, as Director of the Court Reporters Certification Board, Appellants v. Esquire Deposition Services, L.L.C., Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. GN503367, HONORABL

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 204 OPINION This court's opinion issued on March 6, 1991, is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor. Appellant's Motion for Rehearing is overruled. In a Family Code Motion to Modify case, the trial court ordered a substantial increase in the monthly child support. The obligo