Cases

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-1820 ____________ BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO., Appellant v. SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; CENTER

612 F.Supp. 1348 (1985) Kenneth L. BROCK, Plaintiff, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 82-1388-15. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson Division. May 2, 1985. *1349 *1350 Richard S. Vaughan, Anderson, S.C., for plaintiff

807 F.Supp. 1248 (1992) Robert W. BROCK, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Civ. A. No. 2:92-0361. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division. December 7, 1992. *1249 Montie VanNostrand, Webster Springs, WV, for plaintiff. Beverly Dennis, III, Office of Regional Director, Chief Counsel, R

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Nos. 11-11021 & 11-11067 AUG 12, 2011 JOHN LEY

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH  (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS 81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB /211,( %52&.HWDO ; 3ODLQWLIIV$SSHOOHHV  &URVV$SSHOODQWV   1RV

June 10, 1993 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 92-1764 JENNA SKIDGEL, ET AL., Plaintiff, Appellee, v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, Appellee. v. LOUIS W. SULLIVAN, Defendant, Appelllant. No. 92-1824

PER CURIAM. Franklin Brock appeals from a district court 1 order affirming the Secretary of Health and Human Services’ denial of Brock’s application for disability insurance benefits under title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423, and for supplement

USCA1 Opinion June 10, 1993 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________ No. 92-1764 JENNA SKIDGEL, ET AL., Plaintiff, Appellee, v. MAINE DEP

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION HOLDEN, Senior District Judge. In this class action, plaintiff Beda Kendall challenges the procedures used by defendant, the Secretary of Labor, to terminate or reduce benefits under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 8101-8193 (FECA). The claimant Kendall instituted this action in federal district court, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to redress her com

Wilson v . Brock CV-01-284-JD 07/18/02 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Gary D. Wilson v. Civil N o . 01-284-JD Opinion No. 2002 DNH 137 David Brock, et a l . O R D E R The plaintiff, Gary D. Wilson, proceeding pro s e , brings civil rights and state law claims against his former wife, state and f

727 F.2d 1108 Brock (Whitt)v.Secretary of Health and Human Services NO. 83-5021 United States Court of Appeals,sixth Circuit. JAN 24, 1984 1 Appeal From: E.D.Ky. 2 REVERSED.</

Brock, C.J. The plaintiff, Cassandra Hawkins, appeals a Superior Court (Coffey, J.) order dismissing her petition for declaratory and injunctive relief under the Right-to-Know Law, RSA ch. 91-A (2001 & Supp. 2001), seeking access to certain records kept by the defendant, New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). We vacate and remand. In 1998, the plaintiffs counsel, on behalf of

III. DISCUSSION The plaintiffs challenge the 2005 Final Rule on two grounds. First, the plaintiffs argue that the 2005 Final Rule is procedurally deficient under the APA and the Medicare Act because the Rule was not a logical outgrowth of the proposed rules, thereby depriving affected hospitals of fair notice and the ability to submit comments. Pls.' Mem. at 9-19.6 Second, the plaintiffs

Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge *1173This matter comes before the court on the motion of plaintiffs Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Kansas City in Kansas ("the Archdiocese") and St. Rose Philippine Duchesne Catholic Church ("St. Rose Church") for a permanent injunction (Doc. 87). Defendant City of Mission Woods has filed a Response (Doc. 91). And plain

Duggan, J. The plaintiff, Christopher Dobe, appeals the Superior Court’s (Hampsey, J.) orders granting the defendants’ motions to dismiss his claims on the ground that they were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We affirm. In March 1994, the plaintiffs wife, Sonia Dobe, reported to the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) that the plaintiff had sexually abused their three-

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE. SENTELLE, Circuit Judge: The Nursing Center of Buckingham and Hampden, Inc. (“NCBH”), appeals from an adverse decision of the District Court. The District Court affirmed the decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) that NCBH’s 1984 agreement to purchase a nursing home in P

794 F.Supp. 801 (1992) Avril M. DAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, and Leonard Herman, Director of the Ohio Bureau of Disability Determination, Defendants. No. C-1-87-800. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D. November 22, 1991. Order of Clarification July 31, 1992.

652 F.3d 42 (2011) FORSYTH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., et al., Appellants v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee. No. 09-5448. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. August 16, 2011. Harold G. Belkowitz, James P. Holloway, Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, PC, Washington, DC, Robert E. Mazer, Esquire, Ober, Kaler,

*775 COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. A group of seven plaintiffs, including Samantha Hill and Missouri Lieutenant Governor Peter Kinder (acting in his personal capacity), brought this action to challenge various provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“the Act”). Pub.L. No. 111-148, 124 Sta

John C. Coughenour, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff King County's ("King County" or the "County") motion for a preliminary injunction and summary judgment (Dkt. No. 20) and Defendants Alex Azar and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' ("Defendants") cross-motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 26). Having thoroughly considered the parties' briefing and th