Cases

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE BROCK SMITH, ) No. ED109734 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County vs

Peterson, Justice. *737James Brock appeals from the denial of his mandamus petition seeking records related to his murder convictions. We first address whether we have jurisdiction over the appeal arising from this civil action. We conclude that this appeal arises from an extraordinary remedies case "concerning proceedings in which a sentence o

05/08/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 13, 2018 Session MATTHEW BROCK HANCE V. DANIELLE SMITH HANCE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamblen County No. 2016-CV-209 Douglas T. Jenkins, Chancellor No. E2017-01419-COA-R3-CV The iss

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-KA-00739-COA PAULA BROCK APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/05/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. STANLEY ALEX SOREY COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: SMITH COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:

HUNSTEIN, Chief Justice. Derrick Brock was convicted of the murder of James Lockett, who died from injuries sustained in a fire at his rooming house on Bolton Road in Atlanta.1 On appeal, Brock contends that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial and that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to assert the speedy trial claim. Because the trial court properly concluded B

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), entered December 13, 2013. The order, among other things, granted in part plaintiffs motion to set aside the jury verdict. Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on October 22, 2014, It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulati

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), entered December 13, 2013. The order, among other things, granted in part plaintiffs motion to set aside the jury verdict. Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on October 22, 2014, It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulati

327 S.W.3d 645 (2009) STATE of Tennessee v. Jamie Scott BROCK. No. E2007-00766-CCA-R3-CD. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Knoxville. March 25, 2008 Session. June 29, 2009. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court January 25, 2010. *651 Wesley D. Stone, Franklin, Ten

227 B.R. 813 (1997) In re Daniel Ray BROCK, Debtor. Ellen BOYD-SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Daniel Ray BROCK, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 96-2647-RLB-7, Adversary No. 96-301. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. February 14, 1997. *814 J. Bradley Schooley, Hostetler & Kowalik, Indianapolis, IN, for p

227 B.R. 815 (1997) In re Daniel Ray BROCK, Debtor. Ellen BOYD-SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Daniel Ray BROCK, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 96-2647-RLB-7, Adversary No. 96-301. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. March 13, 1997. *816 J. Bradley Schooley, Hostetler & Kowalik, Indianapolis, IN, for plai

85 So.3d 1206 (2012) Rick Harold DUPLANTIS, Appellant, v. BROCK SPECIALTY SERVICES, LTD., et al., Appellees. No. 5D11-620. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. April 27, 2012. *1207 Karl E. Pearson of Powell & Pearson LLP, Winter Park, for Appellant. Michael R. D'Lugo and Kurt M. Spengler of Wicker, Smi

On Motion for Reconsideration. Defendants/Appellees seek reconsideration of our holding in Division 3 that the trial court erred by failing to give Brock’s requested jury charge on nominal damages. They cite, for the first time, the Supreme Court’s decision in Magnetic Resonance Plus v. Imaging Systems Inti.,25 in which the Court held that a party that failed to obtain any of the relief it sought o

501 F.Supp.2d 1337 (2007) Carlos A. ORTEGA, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Stephen BROCK, Big Time "Wings" Sports Grill, Inc., and Charles W. Goggins, Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:07cv368-MHT. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. August 7, 2007. Brian Paul Strength, Jock Michael Smith, Cochran, Cherry, Givens & Smith, Tuskegee, AL, for Plaintiff.

686 S.E.2d 425 (2009) BROCK BUILT, LLC v. BLAKE. No. A09A1537. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 6, 2009. *427 Ashe, Rafuse & Hill, Joshua D. Jewkes, Atlanta, for appellant. Munger & Stone, Thomas J. Munger, Benjamin A. Stone, Atlanta, for appellee. BERNES, Judge. In this employment dispute, appel

213 S.W.3d 194 (2007) Sandra BROCK, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Julie MORAN, Defendant, Wells Fargo Merchant Services, LLC, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendants/Respondents. No. ED 88291. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. January 30, 2007. James J. Leightner, Diekman & Leightner, Clayton, MO, for appellant. David C. Knieriem, C

602 S.E.2d 867 (2004) 268 Ga. App. 849 MEISTER et al. v. BROCK. No. A04A0971. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 30, 2004. *868 Hugh Wood, Wood & Meredith, Atlanta, for Appellant. William Hill, Robert Newcomer, Patricia Ammari, Ashe, Rafuse & Hill, LLP, Atlanta, for Appellee. SMITH, Ch

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY {¶ 1} Defendant/Appellant Brock Smith appeals from the sentence imposed by the Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas. Appellant contends that the trial court erred and abused its discretion in sentencing him more than the minimum term authorized for the offense charged. In light of the Supreme Court of Ohio's recent decision imposed in State v.Foster, 109 Ohio St

143 S.W.3d 47 (2004) John A. BROCK, et al., Respondents, v. George D. BLACKWOOD, Jr., Appellant. No. WD 62828. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. June 15, 2004. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied July 27, 2004. Application for Transfer Denied September 28, 2004. *51 Heywood H.

OPINION MATHIAS, Judge. Paul M. Brock (“Brock”) was convicted in Tippecanoe Superior Court of Class C felony auto theft, Class D felony intimidation, Class A misdemeanor operating a vehicle while intoxicated, Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement, and Class A misdemeanor striking a law enforcement animal, and was also found to be an habitual offe

Order PER CURIAM. Richard A. Brock appeals from his convictions on two counts of first-degree murder, section 565.020.1 RSMo, and two counts of armed criminal action, section 571.015 RSMo. The court sentenced Brock *339to two terms of life imprisonment without parole on the murder charges and two terms of life imprisonment on the armed criminal act