Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Broadview Networks, Inc.”
L&S Motors, Inc. v. Broadview Networks, Inc.public domain
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), dated February 16, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1). Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The plaintiff, L&S Motors, Inc., doing business as Huntington Honda, is an automobile dealership
Verizon New York Inc. v. Broadview Networks, Inc.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Herman Cahn, J. Petitioner moves to compel arbitration of a dispute between the parties (CPLR 7503) concerning respondent’s refusal to pay for certain facilities provided by petitioner. Factual Allegations and Background Petitioner Verizon New York Inc. and respondent Broadview Networks, Inc. are providers of telecommunications services. Under Teleco
614 F.Supp.2d 90 (2009) AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al. v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC. Civil Action No. 06-11109-RWZ. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 24, 2009. *94 Carlos J. Perez-Albuerne, Richard C. Abati, Robert S. Frank, Jr., Emma Drummond Becker, G. Mark Edgarton, Jessica Gan Lee, Robert M. Buchanan, Jr.
Lerner v. Broadview NH, L.L.C.public domain
KLATT, J. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Steven D. Lerner, the executor of the estate of Irene Lerner ("Irene"), appeals a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas that dismissed Lerner's amended complaint against defendant-appellee, Broadview NH, LLC ("Broadview"). For the following reasons, we affirm that judgment in part and reverse it in part. {¶ 2} On January 27, 2016, Lerner filed su
XXL of Ohio, Inc. v. City of Broadview Heightspublic domain
341 F.Supp.2d 765 (2004) XXL OF OHIO, INC., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF BROADVIEW HEIGHTS, et al., Defendants/Third Party Plaintiff, No. 1:01CV2514. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. January 13, 2004. *766 *767 *768
289 F.Supp.2d 260 (2003) NEW YORK ACCESS BILLING, LLC; RCN Telecom Services, Inc.; Broadview Networks, Inc.; Broadview Networks Plus Acquisition Corp.; Essex Communications Corp.; Spectrotel, Inc.; Conversent Communications of New York, LLC; Conversent Communications of New Jersey, LLC; Conversent Communications of Massachusetts, LLC; Conversent Conversent Communications of Connecticut, LLC; Cablevision Lightpath, Inc.; and Starpower Communications, LLC,
WALKER, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Showtime Networks Inc. (“Showtime”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (John S. Mar *1097 tin, Jr., Judge), affirming orders of the United States Bankruptcy Court (Burton R. Lif-land,
Smith-Hoy v. AMC Property Evaluations, Inc.public domain
In a consolidated action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and negligence, the plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated March 28, 2007, which granted that branch of the motion of the defendants AMC Property Evaluations, Inc., doing business as Housemaster, and James D. Schaefer which was for partial summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them to the ext
Fink v. Twentieth Century Homes, Inc.public domain
[Cite as Fink v. Twentieth Century Homes, Inc., 2013-Ohio-4916.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99550 KEVIN T. FINK, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS
Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. CCT Communications, Inc. (In Re CCT Communications, Inc.)public domain
464 B.R. 97 (2011) In re CCT COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Former Debtor. Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc., Plaintiff, v. CCT Communications, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 07-10210 (SMB). Adversary No. 07-1942. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. July 22, 2011. *101 Robert J. Rosenberg, Esq., James Brandt, Esq.,
In Re BGC Partners, Inc. Derivative Litigationpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE BGC PARTNERS, INC. ) CONSOLIDATED DERIVATIVE LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2018-0722-LWW MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: May 13, 2022 Date Decided: August 19, 2022 Christine M. Mackintosh, Michael D. Bell, and Vivek Upadhya, GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Gregory V. Varallo and Andrew E. Blumberg, BERNSTEIN LITO
Daytree at Cortland Square, Inc. v. Walshpublic domain
Joseph F. Bianco, District Judge: Plaintiffs Thomas A. Datre Sr. ("Mr. Datre"), Clara Datre ("Mrs. Datre" and, together with Mr. Datre, the "Datres"), and Daytree at Cortland Square, Inc. ("Daytree" and, collectively, "plaintiffs") bring this action against defendants Michael P. Walsh, Edward Walsh,1 Michael Torres, Robert L. Cicale, and Anthony S. Senft, Jr.; councilmembers of the Town of Islip (the "
D'Amato v. Five Star Reporting, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On August 31, 2010, Reporter’s Ink Corp. (“Reporter’s Ink”) entered into an agreement with the Plaintiff Dorothy D’Amato (“D’Amato”) to acquire her shares of the Defendant Five Star Reporting, Inc. (“Five Star”) in exchange for structured payments of $500,000. As part of the agreement, the Plaintiff was hired by Five Star as a manager of sales and cu
Three Bills, Inc. v. City of Parmapublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 742 Plaintiffs-appellants, Three Bills, Inc. and William I. Hoislbauer, Jr., appeal from summary judgment granted in favor of defendants-appellees, city of Parma and Winston Broadcasting Network, Inc., d.b.a. WBNX, and assign the following errors for our review: "I. The trial court erred in granting defendant,
19-2420-cv Andy Warhol Found. for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2020 Argued: September 15, 2020 Decided: March 26, 2021 Amended: August 24, 2021
[Cite as Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Horizon Natl. Contract Servs., L.L.C., 2012-Ohio-1841.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 96610 GIANT EAGLE, INC., ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS
19-2420-cv The Andy Warhol Foundation for The Visual Arts, Inc. v. Lynn Goldsmith, et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2020 Argued: September 15, 2020 Decided: March 26, 2021 Docket No. 19-2420-cv THE ANDY WARHOL FOUNDATION FOR THE VISUAL ARTS, INC.,
AgriProcessors, Inc. v. Iowa Quality Beef Supply Network, L.L.C. (In Re Tama Beef Packing, Inc.)public domain
FEDERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. On August 20, 2002, the bankruptcy court denied appellant AgriProcessors, Inc.’s claim for administrative expenses, and on September 10, 2002, the bankruptcy court denied AgriProcessors’ motion to alter or amend. AgriProcessors appeals both Orders of the bankruptcy court. We reverse and remand. FACTUAL BACKGROUND On November 8, 2001, debtor Tama Beef Packing,
Santos v. Costco Wholesale, Inc.public domain
271 F.Supp.2d 565 (2003) Juan SANTOS, Plaintiff, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE, INC., Defendant. No. 02 CIV. 2538(CM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 9, 2003. *566 *567 Daniel J. Kaiser, Kaiser Saurborn & Mair, P.C., New York City, for Juan M. Santos, plaintiff. Lorie Almon
DaPonte v. Manfredi Motors, Inc.public domain
335 F.Supp.2d 352 (2004) Arthur DAPONTE and Marcia Daponte, Plaintiffs, v. MANFREDI MOTORS INC., Manfredi Management Corp., Staten Island Motors Inc., Manfredi Auto Central LLC, Nicholas "Nick" Manfredi, individually and in his official capacity, and Corrado "Joe" Manfredi, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants. No. 01 CV 2734(SJ). United States District Court, E.D. New York.