Cases

658 F.Supp.2d 786 (2009) LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs v. Pauline TEDFORD, et al., Defendants. Cause No. 3:07CV73-SA-SAA. United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Western Division. September 15, 2009. *789 David M. Ott, Bryan Nelson PA, Rick D. Norton, William Arthur Whitehead, Jr., Bryan, Nelson, Ra

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00144-CV ___________________________ IN RE STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Relator Original Proceeding 153rd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 153-306745

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 363 This is an appeal from summary judgment for defendants in a declaratory judgment action. The facts and events giving rise to this litigation have been presented to us by way of 15 briefs1 and a nine-volume, 6000-page record, which we have attempted to

505 F.Supp.2d 770 (2007) Kirk WARREN and Kurt Warren, Plaintiffs, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts insurance company, Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-cv-01891-EWN-MEH. United States District Court, D. Colorado. February 15, 2007. *771 *772 Julie Bettencourt Cliff, Carey

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE WESTON T. LOVELAND III, ) No. ED108859 ) Respondent, ) ) vs.

607 N.E.2d 1204 (1992) 154 Ill.2d 90 180 Ill.Dec. 691 OUTBOARD MARINE CORPORATION, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al. (Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellee and Cross-Appellant). Nos. 71753, 71761. Supreme Court of Illinois. December 4, 1992. Rehearing Denied February 1,

775 F.Supp.2d 454 (2011) Andrew BRITT, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL STAR INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant. No. 1:10-CV-168. United States District Court, N.D. New York. April 4, 2011. *456 Edward Flink, Esq., Paul J. Campito, Esq., Flink Smith LLC, Latham, NY, for Plaintiff. Christopher T. Bradley, Esq., Michael S. Gollub, Esq., Mars

570 N.E.2d 1154 (1991) 212 Ill. App.3d 231 156 Ill.Dec. 432 OUTBOARD MARINE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant (Commercial Union Insurance Company, et al., Defendants). OUTBOARD MARINE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 2-90-0349, 2-90-0399.<

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT JEROMY McCRACKIN, ) ) Respondent, ) v. ) ) ) TYNAN MULLEN, ) WD86442 )

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Carmen Britt brings this action in her individual capacity and on behalf of the estate of her aunt, Lula Baity. Britt brings her claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that several defendants violated Baity’s First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights when, allegedly against her will, Baity was removed from h

900 A.2d 208 (2006) 393 Md. 163 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Richard DeHAAN. No. 93, September Term, 2005. Court of Appeals of Maryland. June 5, 2006. *209 Michael J. Budow (Anne K. Howard of Budow and Noble, P.C., of Bethesda, MD), on brief, for petitioner. Francis J. Ford (Fra

667 S.W.2d 648 (1984) 282 Ark. 194 SIMMONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK, Administrator of the Estate of Georgia Huchingson, Deceased and Robert Huchingson, Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Northbrook Insurance Company, Appellees. No. 83-293. Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 9, 1984. Rehearing Denied May 14, 1984.

100 F.Supp.2d 269 (2000) Clyde LEYMEISTER, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. Defendant. No. CIV.A.3:99-CV-1249. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. May 26, 2000. Edward M. Brennan, Pottsville, Harry Rubright, Schuylkill Haven, CT, for Clyde Leymeister, plaintiff. Teresa Ficken Sachs, Britt, Hankins, Schaible & Moughan,

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant David Lee Willis (Willis) brought this diversity action against defendant-appellee Midland Risk Insurance Company (Midland) for breach of an insurance contract and for tortious breach by the insurer of its implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing with its insured. On the latter claim, Willis sought both actual and punitive dama

15 F.3d 1249 In re TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORP. PCB CONTAMINATIONINSURANCE COVERAGE LITIGATION.The FIDELITY & CASUALTY CO. OF NEW YORKv.The TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORP.ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC & GAS INSURANCE SERVICES, LTD.;National Surety Corporationv.TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION; Fidelity & CasualtyInsurance Company of New York; Certain Underwriters atLloyds of London, Including t

CHAPMAN, Circuit Judge: Three attorneys appeal the award of Rule 11 sanctions against them in the amount of $122,834.28. Appellants were sanctioned following the dismissal of a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which they represented certain plaintiffs seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief from the Governor of North Carolina, a number of North Carolina district attorneys, a sheriff, certain State Bureau of Investigation o

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Nos. 91–2493, 91–6043. Richard L. BRITT and Timothy Jackson, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. The GROCERS SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., Defendant–Appellee, James E. HAMILTON, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants,

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Margaret Shilling, No. 38, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Getty, J. INSURANCE LAW–STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS–UNDERINSURED MOTORIST CLAIM The Court of Appeals held that the statute of limitations in an underinsured motorist claim—i.e., when the insured institutes a contract action against its own insurer to recover underinsured motorist benefits—begins to run when the insurer denies the insured’s demand for benefits, thereby breach

52 F.Supp.2d 569 (1999) WM. C. VICK CONSTRUCTION CO., Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Great American Insurance Co., Defendants. No. 5:97-CV-692-BR(1). United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. March 24, 1999. *570 *571 Daniel

Filed 6/15/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, D077794 Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2014-00725287- CU-BT-CXC) v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent; JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al.,