Cases

507 P.3d 732021 COA 149Margaret MULLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.METROPOLITAN CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.Court of Appeals No. 20CA1357Colorado Court of Appeals, Division III.Announced December 16, 2021Larson Larimer Schneider, P.C., Philip C. Zimmerman, Vance R. Larimer, Greenwood Village, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appe

KIEHNE, Judge. {1} Plaintiffs, Angela and Joe Lueras, and David Van Epps, filed two separate lawsuits against GEICO General Insurance Company and GEICO Indemnity Company 1 , respectively, in response to GEICO's refusal to pay uninsured/underinsured (UM/UIM) benefits to them. GEICO declined to pay because Plaintiffs had rejected

GAYNELL R. MASSEY * NO. 2020-CA-0281 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL LIBERTY MUTUAL * AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FOURTH CIRCUIT COMPANY, MATTHEW * GRAYSON BAIRD, AND STATE OF LOUISIANA GEICO AUTOMOBILE ******* INSURANCE COMPANY AS UNINSURED/UNDERINSURED CARRIER FOR MASSEY

ACCEPTED 03-16-00203-CV 13816645 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

OPINION KEITH, Chief Justice. Appellant Minnesota Mutual Fire and Casualty Company (Minnesota Mutual) has *724obtained review of a court of appeals decision in favor of respondents David and Jeanette Malmin. Answering a certified question from Hennepin County District Court in the affirmative, the court of appeals held that the Malmins were entitle

OPINION OF THE COURT Weinstein, J. The instant appeals arise in the context of a no-fault insurance claim by two injured parties and their spouses. On December 30, 1976, defendants Isidore and Martin J. *38Jackowe sustained personal injuries while operating and riding in a motor vehicle owned by Knolls Ambulance Service and insured by plaintiff, the Ae

Morales v Arrowood Indem. Co. (2022 NY Slip Op 01697) Morales v Arrowood Indem. Co. 2022 NY Slip Op 01697 Decided on March 11, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief United States District Judge On July 12, 2017, Jane Carter ("Carter" or "plaintiff") sued Fidelity Life Association ("Fidelity" or "defendant") for breach of contract in Wayne County Superior Court [D.E. 1-1]. On August 11, 2017, Fidelity removed the action to this court [D.E. 1]. On December 1, 2017, Fidelity moved for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 13]. On January 22, 2018, Carter responded in opposition

Powell, J.: *385 E.H., a minor, was a passenger in her parents' automobile when it was involved in a three-car accident. E.H., her mother and father, and her two siblings all filed claims against the tortfeasor's (at-fault driver's) insurance. Because the tortfeasor's insurance was insuffici

— In an action to recover payments made by plaintiff to defendant which were allegedly additional first-party benefits, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.), entered August 27, 1982, which, upon granting plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment, awarded it the principal sum of $8,283.40. Judgment reversed, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to Special Term for a trial in accordance herewi

775 F.Supp.2d 13 (2011) Paul Douglas BURKE, Plaintiff, v. AIR SERV INT'L, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-02335 (HHK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 30, 2011. *15 David E.R. Woolley, Law Office of David E.R. Woolley, Los Angeles, CA, Malcolm Leroy Benge, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger,

OPINION OF THE COURT Shanley N. Egeth, J. The separate summary judgment motions and cross motion relating to this interstate no-fault puzzle are hereby consolidated for a single joint disposition. After two conferences and oral argument, submission of multiple briefs, and considerable independent research, the legal relationships of the parties *130

AMENDED OPINION (amending DE 200) KEVIN MCNULTY, United States District Judge *215Dr. Richard A. Kaul, an anesthesiologist by training, claims to be a minimally invasive spine surgeon. In March 2014, the New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners (the "Board") said otherwise. Because his performance of spine surgeries on 11 patients wit

997 S.W.2d 265 (1999) MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS, Petitioner, v. Jack KIDD, Respondent. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioner, v. Catherine Gerlich, Respondent. Nos. 98-0800, 98-1024. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued March 4, 1999. Decided July 1, 1999. *267 Steven L. Hughes, Kurt

205 P.3d 594 (2009) LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. and Hartford Insurance Group, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellee, Zashell Labrador and PEMCO Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Counterclaimant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Elisa Tolfree, et al., Defendants. No. 27429. Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai`i.

44 B.R. 475 (1984) In re Stanley J. GIBBS, and Susan A. Gibbs, individually and Stanley J. Gibbs as an officer, director or partner of GibbsIrwin Properties Co., Gibbs-Irwin Management Co., Gibbs-Irwin Investment and G.I. Properties, Debtors. Stanley J. GIBBS and Sue A. Gibbs, Plaintiffs, v. F & M MARQUETTE NATIONAL BANK, First Mid-America State Bank of Coon Rapids, Norwest Bank Central, N.A. and Scherer Bros. Lumber Co., Defendants.

*155OPINION OF THE COURT Gulotta, J. The question raised by this appeal concerns the effect of the settlement of a personal injury action and the release entered into as a result thereof upon the rights of the plaintiffs vis-a-vis their own insurance company under an “Additional Personal Injury Protection” indorsement to their policy of automobile lia