Cases

701 F.Supp.2d 1096 (2010) Jon E. DEVARY, an individual, Plaintiff, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., d/b/a America's Wholesale Lender, a California Corp.; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., a Delaware Corp.; Bank of New York, as trustee for CWABS 2005-2; and John & Jane Does 1-10, Defendants. Case No. 09-CV-1146 (PJS/FLN). United States District Court, D. Minnesota.

¶ 1. REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J. This case implicates the authority of Wisconsin courts to exercise general jurisdiction over a foreign corporation. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. petitioned this court for review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals,1 which held that Countrywide consented to general personal jurisdiction in Wisconsin when it appointed a registered agent purs

PER CURIAM: Andrzej Madura and his wife, Anna Do-linska-Madura, appeal pro se the district judge’s granting summary judgment to Bank of America, N.A. (“BOA”). We affirm. I. BACKGROUND A. Underlying Facts On July 26, 2000, Madura obtained a residential home loan from Full Spectrum Lending, Inc. (“Full Spectrum”). Under the terms of the loan agreement, Madura

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DE MENT, District Judge. Before the court is Plaintiff Briggs’ Renewed Motion For Class Certification With Regard To Plaintiffs RESPA Claim Against Defendant Countrywide (“Plaintiffs Renewed Motion”), filed on January 22, 1999 together with Plaintiffs Memorandum Of Law In Support thereof (“Plaintiffs Memorandum”). Defendant Countrywide Funding Corporation (“Countryw

ORDER DE MENT, District Judge. This cause is now presented to the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed September 10, 1997, and plaintiffs’ objection thereto, filed September 23, 1997. The court has carefully read the recommendation and objection and is of the opinion that said recommendation is well taken and is due to be adopted, approved and affirmed. It is, the

949 F.Supp. 812 (1996) Jeff C. BRIGGS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTRYWIDE FUNDING CORP., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 95-D-859-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. August 7, 1996. *813 C. Knox McLaney, III, Angela L. Kimbrough, McLaney & Associates, Montgomery, AL, Lynn W. Jinks, III, and

931 F.Supp. 1545 (1996) Jeff C. BRIGGS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTRYWIDE FUNDING CORP., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 95-D-859-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 8, 1996. *1546 *1547 C. Knox McLaney, III, Angela L. Kimbrough, McLaney & Associat

775 F.Supp.2d 1100 (2011) Collin MYRLIE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTRYWIDE BANK and Countrywide Home Loans subsidiary of Bank of America (f/k/a Countrywide Financial Corporation) Headquarters in Calabasas CA, USA, a New York Corporation, Defendants. Civil No. 09-1441 (JNE/AJB). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. February 23, 2011. *110

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUN- . TERCOMPLAINT MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UMG Recordings, Inc., Capital Records, LLC, Universal Music Corp. (the “record company plaintiffs”), Songs of Universal, Inc., Universal-Polygram International Publishing, Inc., Universal-Polygram International Tunes, Inc., Universal Music-MGA NA, LLC, Universal Music-Tunes, LLC, and Rondor Music

In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: November 2, 2021 S21A0718. ROCKDALE COUNTY v. U.S. ENTERPRISES, INC. et al. S21X0719. U.S. ENTERPRISES, INC. et al. v. ROCKDALE COUNTY. NAHMIAS, Chief Justice. This case arises from Rockdale County’s denial of an application for a permit to build a QuikTrip on property owned by William Corey and U.S. Enterprises, Inc. (the “Owners”), on the groun

ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief Judge. The above matter came on before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron, dated February 18, 2012. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, upon all the files, records and proceedings

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated March 19, 2012 [Docket No. 38]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the

481 F.Supp.2d 559 (2007) Mack C. KNUCKLES and Pamela K. Knuckles, Plaintiffs v. RBMG, INC., a corporation, Global Mortgage Group, Inc., a corporation, Mortgage Portfolio Services, Inc., a corporation, William Whitehair, and Federal National Mortgage Association, Defendants. Civil Action No.: 2:03-2414. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Charleston. March 27, 2

696 F.Supp.2d 1057 (2009) William HELM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC., Defendant. Claude Bryant, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Service Corporation International, et al., Defendants. Nos. C 08-01184 SI, C 08-1190 SI. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 29, 2009. *1061 Annette Gifford, Justin Co

513 F.3d 1314 (2008) Vicki V. BUSBY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JRHBW REALTY, INC., doing business as Realty South, Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-15308. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. *1315 January 17, 2008. *1316

770 N.W.2d 487 (2009) Jewelean JACKSON, Ethylon Brown, William Brown, Brenda Doane, and David Williams, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., and Richard W. Stanek, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Hennepin County, Defendants. No. A08-397. Supreme Court of Minnesota. August 13, 2009.

324 F.Supp.2d 372 (2004) Allen and Sharon SCHNEIDER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITICORP MORTGAGE, INC. and Citicorp, Defendants. No. 97CV837(NG)(CLP). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 13, 2004. *373 Daniel Hume, Roger W. Kirby, Kirby, McInerney & Squire, LLP, Ne

Opinion DUFFY, J. In an earlier lawsuit brought in 2003 (the prior suit), Timothy Paulus was sued by his competitor in an unsuccessful attempt to prevent him from developing a Ford automobile dealership in Morgan Hill, California. That prior suit was brought under Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq. (the unfair competition law (UCL))1 by an established, Gilroy-based

43 Cal.Rptr.3d 148 (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 659 Timothy PAULUS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BOB LYNCH FORD, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. H028629. Court of Appeal, Sixth District. May 17, 2006. *152 Sean B. Absher, James M. Brennan, Stradling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth, San Francisco, for Pl

312 Ga. 752 FINAL COPY S21A0718, S21X0719. ROCKDALE COUNTY v. U.S. ENTERPRISES, INC. et al.; and vice versa. NAHMIAS, Chief Justice. This case arises from Rockdale County’s denial of an application for a permit to build a QuikTrip on property owned by William Corey and U.S. Enterprises, Inc. (the “Owners”), on the ground that the proposed facility is a “truck stop,” which is a prohibited use under the County’s Unified Development Ordinance (“UDO”). After the