Cases

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 761 CA 13-00467 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, CARNI, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF JESUS VALDEZ, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V ORDER BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (LEAH R. NOWO

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.) entered February 4, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment denied the petition. It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Matter of Robles v Evans, 100 AD3d 1455, 1455 [2012]). Present — Smith, J.P, Centra, Carni, Whalen and DeJoseph, JJ.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.) entered February 4, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment denied the petition. It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Matter of Robles v Evans, 100 AD3d 1455, 1455 [2012]). Present — Smith, J.P, Centra, Carni, Whalen and DeJoseph, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with solicitation, gambling, making threats, making false statements and engaging in an unauthorized exchange after he loaned money to another inmate

Rose, J. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a disciplinary determination finding him guilt

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with solicitation, gambling, making threats, making false statements and engaging in an unauthorized exchange after he loaned money to another inmate

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of THC-50. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, pe

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. *1597During a search of petitioner’s cell, a correction officer discovered various items including an altered hot pot, two taped up rolls

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 99-1497 Angel Carrera-Valdez, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Brian Perryman, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 98-C-0687-S--John C. Shabaz, Chief Judge. Submitted March 27, 2000--Decided May 2, 2000 Before Coffey, Easterbrook, and Evans, Circuit Judges. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge. Angel

Todd Allan Butters appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants-respondents ("defendants") on the basis that he did not exhaust his administrative remedies. We affirm. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE Butters is incarcerated at the Idaho Correctional Center (ICC) under the jurisdiction of the Idaho Department of Correction (IDOC). He claims during his incarceration, on October 5

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Angel Carrera-Valdez came to the United States in 1980 during the Mariel boatlift exodus from Cuba. Many of the new arrivals had been convicted of crimes in Cuba, which opened its prisons for those willing to emigrate. Carrera is one of these convicts: shortly before leaving Cuba, he had been sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment for robbery. After arr

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Memorandum Motion to Remand to State Court for Lack of Federal Jurisdiction, filed June 24, 2011 (Doc. 55)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on March 7, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act,

OPINION Opinion by Justice HINOJOSA. This is an appeal from the second revocation of appellant’s community supervision. The trial court has certified that this case “is not a plea-bargain case and the defendant has the right of appeal.” See Tex.R.App. P. 25.2(a)(2). In a single issue, appellant contends the trial

929 S.W.2d 37 (1996) Josue TERAN, M.D., Relator, v. The Honorable Rogelio VALDEZ, Judge of the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, Respondent. Josue TERAN, M.D., and Ira Doneson, M.D., Appellants, v. Joe O. HINOJOSA, Independent Administrator of the Estate of Guadalupe Hinojosa, Deceased, et al., Appellees. Nos. 13-96-243-CV, 13-96-244-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christ

180 Ariz. 313 (1994) 884 P.2d 199 Betty Ann LUCERO, a single woman; Ida Marie Valdez, a minor, by and through her mother and next friend, Betty Ann Lucero, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lawrence VALDEZ, a single man, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 90-662. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E. April 14, 1994. Review Denied N

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1576 GLEYSI IDALIA DIAZ-VALDEZ, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before Gelpí, Montecalvo, and Rikelman

53 F.3d 343NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Sheila VALDEZ, on behalf of h

402 Mass. 65 (1988) 521 N.E.2d 381 COMMONWEALTH vs. DANIEL VALDEZ. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Essex. February 1, 1988. April 4, 1988. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., WILKINS, NOLAN, & O'CONNOR, JJ. Robert J. Bender, Assistant District Attorney (Brian T. O'Keefe, Assistant District Attorney, with him) for the C

BRORBY, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs are a group of patients (collectively the “Patients”) of a psychiatrist who was the subject of a Medicaid fraud investigation. During the investigation, all of the psychiatrist’s records were seized pursuant to a state search warrant. The Patients instituted a civil rights class action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against three state agents (the “defendants”)1

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 08-JUN-2026 08:01 AM Dkt. 7 ODDP SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF