Cases

DARRELL TURNER, ) ) Sumner Circuit Plaintiff/Appellant, ) No. 14772-C ) VS. ) ) Appeal No. BRIAN W. SKELLY, ) 01A01-9708-CV-00376 ) Defendant/Appellee. ) FILED IN THE COURT OF

303 F.Supp.2d 941 (2004) Thomas JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. TELLABS, INC., Michael J. Birck, Richard C. Notebaert, Robert W. Pullen, Joan E. Ryan, Brian Jackman and John C. Kolher, Defendants. No. 02 C 4356. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 19, 2004. *944 Marvin Alan Miller, Jennifer Winter Spren

262 F.Supp.2d 937 (2003) Thomas JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. TELLABS, INC., Michael J. Birck, Richard C. Notebaert, John Vaughn, Robert W. Pullen, Joan E. Ryan, Brian Jackman, J. Thomas Gruenwald, Kolher, William F. Souders Catherine Kozik, Defendants. No. 02 C 4356. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. May 19, 2003. ST. EVE, District Judge.

995 A.2d 685 (2010) 414 Md. 357 Thomas SMITH v. STATE of Maryland. No. 102, September Term, 2009. Court of Appeals of Maryland. May 17, 2010. *686 Brian L. Zavin, Asst. Public Defender (Paul B. DeWolfe, Public Defender, Baltimore), on brief, for petitioner. Jeremy M. McCoy, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Douglas

ORDER JEANNE J. GRAHAM, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Discovery from Non-party McGladrey & Pullen, LLP (Doc. No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants the motion in part. This dispute arises from a subpoena issued from the District of Minnesota and served on McGladrey & Pullen, LLP (“McGladrey”).

252 S.W.3d 279 (2007) Brian L. VANBEBBER v. Jon ROACH, et al. No. E2006-02062-COA-R3-CV. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Section, at Knoxville. May 17, 2007 Session. September 26, 2007. Permission to Appeal Denied March 3, 2008. *280 John T. Johnson, Jr. and William J. Carver, Knoxville, T

Justice Boyd, joined by Justice Lehrmann, concurring.. The Client,1 represented by the Attorneys,2 settled a lawsuit and received both monetary payments and ownership interests in a business referred to as WECO. Pursuant to their contingency-fee agreement, the Client paid the Attorneys forty percent, of the monetary payments. The issue is whether .th

PER CURIAM: This appeal consolidates forty-eight individual appeals arising out of multidistrict litigation in In re Denture Cream Products Liability Litigation, 1:09-md-02051-CMA. In their complaints, Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants produced a denture cream that caused Plaintiffs to develop a condition known as copper deficiency myelopathy. In 2015, the district court issued an order granting De

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE KAREN FANN, in her official capacity as President of the Arizona Senate; WARREN PETERSEN, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee; the ARIZONA SENATE, a house of the Arizona Legislature, Petitioners, v. THE HONORABLE MICHAEL KEMP, Judge of the SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARI

Gen. 67] 67 PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES EDUCATION – A STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS WHO IS APPOINTED TO A VACANCY IN THE MIDDLE OF A TERM SERVES FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE UNEXPIRED TERM. April 21, 2021 Clarence C. Crawford President, Maryland State Board of Education You have asked for an opinion of the Attorney General on whether, when the current State Superintendent of Schools (“St

Gen. 67] 67 PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES EDUCATION – WHETHER A STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS APPOINTED TO A VACANCY IN THE MIDDLE OF A TERM SERVES FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE UNEXPIRED TERM April 21, 2021 Clarence C. Crawford President, Maryland State Board of Education You have asked for an opinion of the Attorney General on whether, when the current State Superintendent of Schools (

974 A.2d 991 (2009) 186 Md. App. 498 Thomas SMITH v. STATE of Maryland. No. 2764, September Term, 2007. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. July 6, 2009. *993 Brian L. Zavin (Nancy S. Forster, Public Defender on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant. *994 Jeremy

976 F.Supp. 40 (1997) Iris RICHARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BELL ATLANTIC CORPORATION, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-02168(RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 10, 1997. *41 John Wadie Hermina, Hermina & Hermina, Laurel, MD, for Iris Richard, Jonathan Barnes, Kareem Abdul-Ali, Ros

WRIGHT, J. This appeal arises from a decision of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City denying appellant’s, Madison Park Partnership’s (“Madison Park”), Petition for a Writ of Administrative Mandamus & Petition for Judicial Review (“Petition”). The Petition sought reversal of a decision by appellee, the Commissioner 1 of the Baltimore City Department of Housing and Community Development (“Depart

2 S.W.3d 339 (1999) Richard Waller BURNS, Appellant, v. Waller Thomas BURNS II and Theo W. Pinson, III, Dependent Administrator of the Estate of Dorothy Jane Burns, Deceased, Appellees. No. 04-98-00191-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. May 12, 1999. Rehearing Overruled July 6, 1999. *340

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this

852 A.2d 1029 (2004) 157 Md. App. 504 Brian CAMPBELL v. LAKE HALLOWELL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al. No. 1132, September Term, 2003. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. July 2, 2004. *1032 Brian Campbell, Brookville, for appellant. Kathleen A. Carey (Jordan & Keys, L.L.P. on the brief), Washi

303 F.3d 496 Curtis M. ADKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, andLee Ayers; Angelo Bailey; Daniel Ballengee; Bobby Belcher; Lawrence Bentz; Larnie Boddy, Jr.; John Burgess; Eric Conley; Jan Courts; Cheryl Davis; Glenn Davis; Phillip Davis; Michael N. Dishner, Sr.; James Donaldson; Alexander Doran; Bruce Duling; Blake Friend; Harry Gaynor; Christopher Greene; James Hairston; Gail Harper; Edward Harvey; Floyd D. Hatfield, Sr.; Leland L. Holman; Shaun Jeffr

PER CURIAM: Ronald Bert Smith appeals the dismissal of his federal habeas corpus petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, as amended by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, (“AED-PA”), Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. The district court dismissed the federal petition because it was not filed within AEDPA’s one-year statute of limitations. The only issues here involve tolling.

414 F.Supp.2d 1023 (2006) Debra VANDERWERF, Individually and as Next Friend for Riley and Tanner Vanderwerf, Minors, and Estate of William K. Vanderwerf, Plaintiffs, v. SMITHKLINEBEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline and Eli Lilly and Company, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 05-2271-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. January 5, 2006.