Cases

St. Eve, Circuit Judge. Scott Schmidt shot and killed his estranged wife. He confessed at the scene, but come trial he sought to mitigate his crime with the second-degree defense of adequate provocation. The Wisconsin trial court, in deciding whether the defense should go to the jury, asked for an offer of proof and an evidentiary hearing. Schmidt complied with the first request but bal

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-1727 SCOTT SCHMIDT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BRIAN FOSTER, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Ea

STEVENSON, J. The instant appeal arises out of a final judgment of dissolution ending the nearly thirty-year marriage of Brian and Deborah Schmidt. The final judgment distributed *33nearly $6 million in assets to the husband, nearly $850,000 in assets to the wife, and requires the husband to pay the wife an equalizing payment of approximately $2.5 million. The assets awa

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District ANDREA E. STOCKMAN, ) ) Respondent, ) ) WD85691 Consolidated Case: WD85694 v. ) OPINION FILED:

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐1727 SCOTT E. SCHMIDT, Petitioner‐Appellant, v. BRIAN FOSTER, Warden, Respondent‐Appellee.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐1727 SCOTT E. SCHMIDT, Petitioner‐Appellant, v. BRIAN FOSTER, Warden, Respondent‐Appellee.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-1727 SCOTT SCHMIDT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BRIAN FOSTER, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Ea

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-1727 SCOTT SCHMIDT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BRIAN FOSTER, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Ea

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-1727 SCOTT SCHMIDT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BRIAN FOSTER, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Ea

GUIDRY, J. Defendant, Timothy Schmidt, appeals from a judgment of the trial court finding him guilty of contempt of court and ordering him to pay $110,758.38, representing his pro rata share of medical expenses found by the court to be medically necessary for the parties' minor child and which were not covered by insurance, $15,000.00 in attorney's fees, and $2,470.50 in costs. For the reasons that follow, we amend in part and as am

GUIDRY, J. Defendant, Timothy Schmidt, appeals from a judgment of the trial court finding him guilty of contempt of court and ordering him to pay $110,758.38, representing his pro rata share of medical expenses found by the court to be medically necessary for the parties' minor child and which were not covered by insurance, $15,000.00 in attorney's fees, and $2,470.50 in costs. For the reasons that follow, we amend in part and as am

PER CURIAM. Appellant, Former Husband, appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage and order denying his motion for rehearing. Former Husband raises four issues: 1) whether he is entitled to a new final hearing because of the delay between the trial court’s oral pronouncements and the final judgment; 2) whether the amount of permanent periodic alimony is supported by the evidence; 3) whether the amount of attorney’s

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

360 S.W.3d 348 (2012) Tina M. SCHMIDT, Respondent, v. Brian G. SCHMIDT, Appellant. No. ED 96500. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. March 6, 2012. Paul Joseph Stingley, Fulton, MO, for appellant. The Krueger Law Firm, LLC, Robert V. Krueger, Mexico, MO, for respondent. Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J, MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHE

Affirmed.

109 S.W.3d 480 (2003) Ex parte Eric Brian SCHMIDT, Appellant. Nos. 1104-99, 1105-99. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. July 2, 2003. *481 Henry L. Burkholder, III, Houston, for Appellant. Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Asst. DA, Houston, Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State. Before the court en banc.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-01791-COA MICHAEL JAMES AND ASSOCIATED APPELLANTS GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF MISSISSIPPI, INC. v. BRIAN DEDEAUX AND CONSTRUCTOR APPELLEES SERVICES, INC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/28/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHRISTOPHER LOUIS SCHMIDT COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:

ISHEE, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Kevern Fields is an inmate in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC). Fields was confined at the Central Mississippi Correctional Facility (CMCF). In early 2016, Fields was issued two separate rule-violation reports (RVR) for possessing various contraband items. After hearings on the two RVRs, Fields wa

SANDSTROM, Justice. [¶ 1] Steven Schmidt appeals from a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of theft of property. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in denying Schmidt’s motion to suppress evidence and his proposed jury instruction, and the court did not abuse its discretion in denying his pre-trial motion. I [¶ 2] On November 1, 2010, after speaking with he

BARNES, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Henry Hinton is an inmate in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC), confined at the Mississippi State Penitentiary (MSP). Hinton was found guilty of two rule violations for verbally engaging in bribery with a correction officer and pursuing a relationship with that correction officer. As punishment, Hinton lost privileges for one