Cases

PER CURIAM. Brian McLane appeals a non-final order denying his Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. We '’agree that' the evidence was insufficient to show that McLane* had sufficient minimum' contacts with Florida, and the motion should have been granted. McLane, a Kentucky resident, is a managing member of Nostego, L

ORDER & REASONS ELDON E. FALLON, District Judge. Before the Court is a Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff Henry J. Ellender Heirs, L.L.C. (Rec. Doc. 14-711). The Court has reviewed the briefs and applicable law and, after hearing oral argument on the motion, now issues this Order & Reasons. I. BACKGROUND On February 18, 2014, the Plaintiff filed the present

FILED Dec 12, 2018 11:34 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

KEATY, Judge. Defendants-Relators, XH, LLC; Kingfisher Resources, Inc.; and Petro-Hunt, L.L.C., seek supervisory writs from a judgment which denied, in part, their exception of no right of action filed against Plaintiff-Respondent, Catahoula Lake Investments, LLC. In Docket Number 17-649 with this court, Plaintiff-Relator, Catahoula Lake Investments, LLC, seeks supervisory writs from the same judgment which granted, in part, the e

KEATY, Judge. Plaintiff-Relator, Catahoula Lake Investments, LLC, seeks supervisory writs from a judgment which granted, in part, an exception of no right of action filed by Defendants-Respondents, XH, LLC; Kingfisher *587Resources, Inc.; and Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. In Docket Number 17-651 with this court, Defendants-Relators, XH, LLC; Kingfisher

Cite as 2023 Ark. 175 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-23-340 Opinion Delivered: November 30, 2023 ROBINSON NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI D/B/A ROBINSON NURSING AND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH REHABILITATION CENTER DIVISION APPELLAN

Cite as 2023 Ark. 173 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-23-340 Opinion Delivered: November 30, 2023 ROBINSON NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI D/B/A ROBINSON NURSING AND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH REHABILITATION CENTER DIVISION APPELLAN

CARAWAY, J. _JjThe trial court dismissed a portion of the damage claims brought by plaintiff landowners in this so-called legacy litigation by application of the subsequent purchaser doctrine. The plaintiffs did not own the land until 2002. Their land remains subject to existing mineral leases and a mineral servitude. The partial judgment ruling of the trial court was certified for immediate appeal. We affirm the pre-purchase

O'Malley, Circuit Judge. United States Navy veteran John Scott appeals a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims ("the Veterans Court") affirming the determination of the Board of Veterans' Appeals ("the Board"). The Board determined that Scott was only entitled to a disability rating under diagnostic code ("DC") 5276 on the VA's disability rating schedule and

Opinion CROSKEY, J. Under California Constitution, article XIII B, section 6, subdivision (a), whenever the state mandates a new program or higher level of service upon a local government, the state is required to provide a subvention of funds to reimburse the local government for the costs of the mandated program or increased service. In this case, we are concerned with a mandated program for which the state

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DARRELL PRINCE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-746 (JEB) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this pro se and in forma pauperis action, Plaintiff Darrell Prince alleges that police officers used excessive force in unlawfully se

FILED Mar 15, 2019 03:10 PM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION

MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL M. BLACK, Bankruptcy Judge. The matters before the Court are Sun-Trust Mortgage, Ine.’s Amended Motion to Revoke Order of Confirmation and Amended Motion for Relief from Post-Confirmation Stay (the “Motion”), the Chapter 13 Trustee’s Objection and Response, and the Answer of the Debtor, Rachel Sue Ulrey (the “Debtor”), thereto. For the reasons noted below, as a condition of the s

J -A27012-18 2019 PA Super 217 T.M. AND BRENDA TINKHAM IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA APPELLANTS v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.; JOHNSON & JOHNSON; JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC; No. 184 EDA 2018 EXCERPTA MEDICA, INC.; AND ELSEVIER INC., Appeal from the Judgment Entered December 4, 2017 In th

OSCN Found Document:POSEY v. STATE Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only

Justice GREEN delivered the Opinion of the Court. Under the learned intermediary doctrine, the manufacturer of a pharmaceutical product satisfies its duty to warn the end user of its product’s potential risks by providing an adequate warning to a “learned intermediary,” who then assumes the duty to pass on the necessary warnings to the end user. See, e.g., Gravis v. Parke-Davis & Co., 502 S.W.2d

ORDER YOCK, Judge. This civilian overtime and premium pay dispute is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed on June 4, 1990. For the reasons stated herein, defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. Facts All the plaintiffs in this case are guards employed by the United States Department of

410 F.Supp. 770 (1975) A. C. SHERRILL, Plaintiff, and Robert H. Costner et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. J. P. STEVENS AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. C-C-73-12. United States District Court, W. D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. November 11, 1975. *771 *772