Cases

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter. 2016 UT 40 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH ELIZABETH CRAIG, BRADY HARPER, NU LITE SALES, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, Appellees, v. PROVO CITY, a municipal corporation, Appellant.

Opinion TOOMEY, Judge: T1 Elizabeth Craig, Brady Harper, and Nu Lite Sales, LLC (collectively, Appellants) challenge the district court's decision to dismiss their action against Provo City after concluding that Utah Code section 78B-2-111 (the Savings Statute) does not apply to claims brought under the Governmental Immunity Act of Utah (the UGIA). See Utah Co

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT O’TOOLE, Chief Judge: A military judge, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted the appellant, in accordance with his pleas, of one specification each of receipt, possession, and distribution of child pornography, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934, and 18 U.S.C. § 2252A. The military judge sentenced the appellant to confinement

PER CURIAM: Consistent with his pleas, Appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial of receipt, distribution, and possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (2006), as incorporated by Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2006). The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 13, 2011 Decided February 7, 2012 No. 11-5076 BRIAN HALL, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AND MARK J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, APPEL

OPINION OF THE COURT MATHEWS, Judge: The appellant was charged with dereliction of duty, willfully damaging military property, and larceny, in violation of Articles 92, 108, and 121, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 908, 921. He pled guilty to the dereliction of duty and damaging military property offenses. His pleas on those specifications were provident, and he does not challenge them on appeal.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 167 TP 12-01564 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF CRAIG SINGLETARY, PETITIONER, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT. WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI OF COUNSE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-CP-00165-COA CONSOLIDATED WITH NO. 2017-CP-00700-COA CONSOLIDATED WITH NO. 2015-TS-01292 BRIAN BRITT APPELLANT v. CRAIG BRADLEY ORRISON AND THE SHED, APPELLEES INC.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge AGEE wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge GREGORY joined. OPINION AGEE, Circuit Judge: Mark J. McBurney and Roger W. Hurlbert (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the district court’s award of summary judgment to the Deputy Commissioner and Director of the Division of Child Support E

[Cite as State v. Craig, 2025-Ohio-4571.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. {48}L-24-1126 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0202301746 v. Johnny Craig DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant Decided:

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-5277 _____________________________ BRIAN M. CASEY, Appellant, v. MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. J. Scott Duncan, Judge. April 29, 2019

Lisa White Hardwick, Judge Troy and Heather Craig (hereinafter “Craig”)1 appeal the circuit court’s judgment quieting title to disputed parcels of property in favor of Brian Brasher. Craig contends the circuit court erred in finding that Brasher established title to the land through adverse possession. For reasons explained herein, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Factua

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 22-2788 _______________ ADA ANGLEMEYER; RICHARD C. ANGLEMEYER; JEFFREY ANGLEMEYER; JOSEPH KLUSKA, Appellants v. CRAIG AMMONS; BRIAN ATKINSON; NATHAN AUKAMP; MARK A. BENSON; DAVID BRODEUR; JOHN P. CHULOCK; PETER DEL GAIZO; BRIAN L.

03/04/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 2, 2023 Session GLEN HALE v. BRIAN BERGMANN ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Coffee County No. 08-96 J.B. Cox, Chancellor1 _______________________

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRIAN BALLENTINE; CATALINO No. 20-16805 DAZO; KELLY PATTERSON, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-01584- and APG-EJY GAIL SACCO, Plaintiff, OPINION v. CHRISTOPHER T. TUCKER, Detective, Defendant-Appellee,

Manion, Circuit Judge. This class action suit challenges the red light camera program of the Village of Lakemoor, Illinois. The plaintiffs received violation notices from Lakemoor that they claim are invalid because the notices lack a proper municipal code citation. They also claim Lakemoor denied them due process by limiting the defenses that can be asserted before a hearing officer to

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0556-23 BRIAN DALE NIXON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS MEDINA COUNTY WALKER, J., filed a dissentin

Barrett, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I dissent from the majority opinion for three reasons. First, I disagree that clearly established Supreme Court precedent dictates the resolution of Schmidt's Sixth Amendment claim. The majority says that this ex parte and in camera proceeding was a "critical stage," but the Court's "critical stage" precedent deals exclusively with adversarial confrontations between the defendan

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Petty, Athey and Senior Judge Frank Argued by videoconference PUBLISHED BRIAN WESLY RUFF OPINION BY v. Record No. 0694-20-2 JUDGE CLIFFORD L. ATHEY, JR. JULY 27,

ACCEPTED 12-15-00005CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/14/2015 10:02:33 AM