Cases

[Cite as Lu v. Univ. of Dayton, 2025-Ohio-1948.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY WEIJIE LU : : Appellant : C.A. Nos. 30272; 30375 : v.

PAINTER, Judge. | j Defendant, The Summit, appeals the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying its motion to modify judgment which sought to have a prior judgment in favor of the claimant, Kath-lene Walker (Walker), modified to include a finding that Walker is capable of working and is no longer entitled to benefits or, alternatively, to include a finding that Walker is capable of working and entitled to SE

Zhao Ming Lu v Jackson Ht. Roosevelt Dev. II, LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 05371) Zhao Ming Lu v Jackson Ht. Roosevelt Dev. II, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 05371 Decided on October 30, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State

COOKS, Judge. | ¿FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Claimant, Mildred Deloach, sustained a work-related head injury on October 6, 2009, while employed at the LSU Agricultural Center. FARA Insurance Services, the third party administrator of Claimant’s workers’ compensation claim, accepted her claim as compensable and she was approved for her choice of physician, Dr. Arsham Naalbandian, a neurologist.

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 25, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 144

LOGAN, Circuit Judge. Defendant Brian David Roth appeals his sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to theft of government property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. On appeal, defendant argues that the district court erred in departing upward from his calculated guideline sentencing range and that he should have received credit for the time he served awaiting disposition

^357-04- XH X6E Ut-illEU S'ii^xBb Di&C'i'RICl COURT H'UR-'i'iil, SQUl'isERM Dlfa'x'RKJ'i- OF I'E&AS iiQUS'lOB DIV1L10B I to RE. ^ ' > ,_ I usi>c

Environmental Court of Vermont State of Vermont =============================================================================== E N T R Y R E G A R D I N G M O T I O N =============================================================================== JLD Properties-Wal-Mart Stormwater Discharge Permit, Docket No. 129-5-06 Vtec Project: Wal-Mart St. Albans and 221-10-07 Vtec Applicant: JLD

0 V{),3'6r- o4- This document contains some pages that are of poor quality at the time of imaging. c4~>F A/D. 7(o!J(u I J;l~~~JYufPJtLs APR 21 2015 DeA-fZ CctArzTS

\Itt-.\( 1 \.3\.~\osec-a '\-::; \ . -" \") 1\ t f\o,'-Ofl ~ LeJ<:v~ \-o ~ . ~ \\~\\s W~\\o? f'\M-~mllS

$£tte_/*///j£d£ § 3Jtt4k D'skicL&oLl tt).tJt/as3?3$ RECEIVED IN The Court of Ai Appeals % The^6urtofA»p?als— ' Sixth Distrl district Sixth District JUL 0 8 2016 WL 0 fl 20IU V' —Texarkana-Texas-\--—J Debra Autrey, Clerk -Texafk-ariarTexas-

Environmental Court of Vermont State of Vermont =========================================================================== E N T R Y R E G A R D I N G M O T I O N =========================================================================== JLD Prop. Wal*Mart Act 250 LU Permit (Altered), Docket No. 116-6-08 Vtec Project: St. Albans Wal*Mart Applicant: JLD Properties (Appeal from a determinati

Environmental Court of Vermont State of Vermont =========================================================================== E N T R Y R E G A R D I N G M O T I O N =========================================================================== JLD Prop. Wal*Mart Act 250 LU Permit (Altered), Docket No. 116-6-08 Vtec Project: Wal-Mart St. Albans Applicant: JLD Properties (Appeal from a determination by the Dist

Chief Justice Ketchum, dissenting: I personally do not believe private, for-profit, corporations should have the power to take a person’s land by eminent domain. However, the laws enacted by our Legislature clearly allow such a taking. This case presents a different wrinkle in the law of eminent domain: A private, for-profit, corporation seeks to take the landowner’s property through the power

44 § . Cau€e numbe((€) #20,570 end 20>572 RFCE;VED|N 06 »'A.S_" 00 /9/@ O‘5 27 33 m n 7 2015 § »\-\un+ coun+v;n_ggqg§§. "\'Ke\a&o;\' The Court of Appeals ' Tez<;:ré»/ ana 119an \_ ` Sixth District " fileer ilu§rey, C\erK § amos wag¢ cc +§§e 354“‘ *AU(; 0 7 2015 B\S*'<\c\' QL)ur-L ` _ K w ` ` c _`&Y; § Texarkana, Texas m ‘5 ° ‘L" "`°“° Debra K. Autr:ey”_©§|e§nk `Kes Panden+ '.P€-H-{»ion

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Betty Lu Hughes appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment declaring that defendant Owners Insurance Company (“Owners”) is not obligated to cover her claim for damages caused by an underinsured motorist. For the reasons stated below, we affirm. Hughes was a

Levine, J. The appellant raises two issues for our review. The first issue is whether a trial court must enforce a settlement agreement concerning the assets of an incompetent ward where the guardian retained some assets to pay guardianship expenses, contrary to the express language of the settlement agreement. The second issue is whether, upon the death of a ward, a guardian may retain part of a deceased ward’s assets to pa

242 S.W.3d 436 (2007) In the Interest of X.R., a minor. No. ED 89384. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. October 30, 2007. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied December 11, 2007. Application for Transfer Denied January 22, 2008. Mary D. Fox, St. Louis, for Appellant. Luser, Hughes & Lusser, Rene' E

NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge Plaintiff Stephanie Rosenfeld brings this action under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act ("ECPA"), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510 et seq. and 2701 et seq.,

OPINION BARRY, Circuit Judge. This case arises out an unfortunate workplace accident that occurred in Newark, New Jersey when Christos Ortzian, appellant herein, fell from the platform of a stationary mixing truck. Ortzian was seriously injured, and the effects of the fall continue to manifest themselves through migraines, seizures, anxiety, and related medical problems. He sued the designer and manufacture