Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATIONWIDE BIWEEKLY No. 15-16220 ADMINISTRATION, INC., an Ohio corporation, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 5:14-cv-05166- LHK v. JAN LYNN OWEN, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Business Oversight for the State of California,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID G. DONOVAN, Hanford No. 22-35474 Security Police Officer; CODY ALMQUIST; KORA BALES; D.C. No. DOUGLAS ANDERSON; JESS 4:21-cv-05148- BEAN; JEFF AHLERS; CYRUS TOR ANDERSON; DANIEL BEAM; TAIN BALLANTYNE; CHRISTOPHER J. HALL, Hanford OPINION Security Police Officer; JARED BETKER; DAYNNA COFFEY ARDAMICA; THOMAS R. ARDAMICA, Safety Bases Compli

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: In this set of consolidated appeals, plaintiffs are former or current employees of the Drummond Company, Inc. (“the Company”) and members of the United Mine Workers of America (“the Union”) 1 who were suspected of stealing goods from the Company. They appeal the grant of summary judgment to th

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOMONIC RONALDO MALONE, No. 22-16671 Petitioner-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-01146- v. RFB-NJK BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE ORDER STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents-Appellants.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRIAN MECINAS; CAROLYN VASKO; No. 20-16301 DNC SERVICES CORPORATION, DBA Democratic National Committee; D.C. No. DSCC; PRIORITIES USA; PATTI 2:19-cv-05547- SERRANO, DJH Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION KATIE HOB

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Jul 27 2020, 9:17 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) WILLIAM LEE et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 19-cv-00830 (APM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) WILLIAM LEE et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 19-cv-00830 (APM)

MEMORANDUM ** Brian Bokkes appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Bokkes contends that the district court procedurally erred by faffing to consider the Guidelines range and the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors, instead imposing sentence b

OWENS, J. ¶ 1 At issue here is the constitutionality of sentencing juvenile offenders to life in prison without the possibility of parole or early release. The State appeals a Court of Appeals, Division Two decision holding that the provision of our state's Miller1 -fix statute that allows 16- and 17-year-olds to be sentenced to life without parole violates the Washington Constitution's ban on

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 263 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISIONS III & IV No. CV-22-774 BRANDON LEE YARBERY, AS Opinion Delivered April 17, 2024 TRUSTEE OF THE BRANDON LEE YARBERY BYPASS TRUST; PAUL E. APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN RUSH AND CAROLYN SUE RUSH, COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTE

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00144-CR ___________________________ AUDIE LEE BUTLER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 271st District Court Wise County, Texas Trial Court No. CR22249 Before Birdwell, Womack, and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

NOS. 12-20-00232-CR 12-20-00233-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS JIMMY LEE GONZALES, § APPEALS FROM THE 7TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

USCA11 Case: 21-13880 Document: 50-1 Date Filed: 04/10/2023 Page: 1 of 21 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-13880 ____________________ KIMBERLY REGENESIS, LLC,

Opinion *450Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John Z. Lee, United States District Judge In this asbestos personal injury case, Defendants Crane Co. (“Crane”), Exxon-Mobil Oil Corporation (“Mobil”), and Owens-Illinois, Inc.1 (“Owens”) have variously moved the Court to bar Plaintiff Charles Krik (“Krik”) from calling certain expert witnesses at trial. Before the Court for decision are multiple mot

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN Z. LEE, United States District Judge In this asbestos personal injury case, Defendants Crane Co. (“Crane”), Exxon-Mobil Oil Corporation (“Mobil”), Owens-Illinois, Inc. (“Owens”), and the Marley-Wylain Company (fik/a Weil-McLain)1 (“Weil”) have variously moved the Court to bar Plaintiff Charles Krik (“Krik”) from calling certain expert witnesses a

269 S.C. 421 (1977) 237 S.E.2d 768 The STATE, Respondent, v. Eugene Owens LEE, Appellant. 20516 Supreme Court of South Carolina. September 20, 1977. *422 *423 W. Gaston Fairey and P. Lewis Pitts, Jr., of Columbia, for Appellant. Daniel R.

CARAWAY, J. hOn October 30, 2012, a unanimous jury found Christopher Brian Cope guilty of one count of first degree murder of a police officer in violation of La. R.S. 14:30. After the jury deadlocked on the sentencing portion of the proceedings, the court imposed a life sentence at hard labor without benefits. Cope appeals his conviction raising three trial errors. We affirm. Facts

HINES, Justice. This case concerns the management of prisons and inmates in Georgia, and its effects potentially sweep broadly across that subject. Specifically, this case concerns who is legally authorized to select the drug or drugs to be used in executions in Georgia and how that choice may be made. However, this case could also affect the remaining myriad of management decisions made throughout Georgia’s prison system, and