Cases

KENNEDY, J., dissenting. {¶ 1} Relator, Lauren Kesterson, has filed a petition for reasonable attorney fees under R.C. 149.43(C)(2)(b)(i) of the Ohio Public Records Act;1 she requests an award of $35,578.66. The majority grants attorney fees in the amount of $32,624.98. I would award $31,167.43. Because the respondent, Kent State University, disputes the amount of Kesterson's request, and b

193 P.3d 110 (2008) Leo C. BRUTSCHE, Petitioner, v. CITY OF KENT, a Washington municipal corporation; and King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, Respondents. No. 79252-6. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued January 17, 2008. Decided October 2, 2008. *112 John Rolfing Muenster, M

Madsen, J. ¶1 In executing a search warrant for a suspected methamphetamine lab on premises owned by petitioner Leo C. Brutsche, law enforcement officers using a battering ram to gain entry caused physical damage to doors and doorjambs. Mr. Brutsche brought suit against the city of Kent (City), among others, arguing that the officers had a duty to conduct the search so as to avoid unnecessary damage and do the least damage to the

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-0

NO. 07-01-0078-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D MARCH 1, 2001 ______________________________ IN RE JEFFREY KENT McLAURIN,

AYRES, Judge. This is an action to recover workmen’s compensation on account of the death of Howard Wallace Brian’ The beneficiaries are the surviving widow and two minor children. The defendants are Brian’s employer, Retsal Drilling Company, Inc., and its compensation insurance carrier, Employers Casualty Company. The deceased was an oil field worker. He died about 3:00 o’clock p. m. June 23, 1957, of a coronary occlusion a

270 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir. 2001) IN RE: THE EXXON VALDEZ,GRANT BAKER, ET AL., AS REPRESENTATIVES OF THE MANDATORY PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLASS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEESv.JOSEPH HAZELWOOD, DEFENDANT,ANDEXXON CORPORATION; EXXON SHIPPING COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTSIN RE: THE EXXON VALDEZ,GRANT BAKER, ET AL., AS REPRESENTATIVES OF THE MANDATORY PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLASS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,v.EXXON CORPORATION; EXXON SHIPPING CO

ORDER RE: B-K LIGHTING’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF VALIDITY AND FRESNO VALVES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY; FRESNO VALVES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INFRINGEMENT MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. This is a patent dispute between B-K Lighting, Inc. (“B-K”) and Fresno Valves & Castings, Inc. (“FVC”). On May 23, 2008, the court granted FVC’s motion for summary judgment of

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, the en banc court affirmed the Eastern District of Louisiana’s judgment in United States v. Wright, No. 09-CR-103 (E.D.La. Dec. 16, 2009), and vacated the Eastern District of Texas’s judgment in United States v. Paroline,

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by KING, JERRY E. SMITH and GRAVES, Circuit Judges: I agree with my colleagues in the majority that we should grant mandamus in In re Amy and remand for entry of a restitution award.1 I also agree that we should vacate the award entered in Wright and

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge, joined by CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge, and E. GRADY JOLLY, EDITH H. JONES, EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, JENNIFER WALKER ELROD and HAYNES, Circuit Judges: The original opinion in this matter was issued by the en banc court on October 1, 2012. In re Unknown, 697 F.3d 306 (5th Cir.2012) (en banc). A petition for rehearing en banc is currently pending before the en b

102 F.Supp.2d 923 (2000) PACIFIC TALL SHIPS COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff, v. KUEHNE & NAGEL INC., a New York Corporation; Blue Anchor Line Division of Transpac Container System Ltd., an Unknown Foreign Entity; Nacora Insurance Brokers Inc., a New Jersey Corporation; Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., a California Insurance Corporation, Defendants. No. 98 C 2255. United States District Cou

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 20-FEB-2024 09:09 AM Dkt. 62 SO

76 F.Supp.2d 886 (1999) PACIFIC TALL SHIPS COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff, v. KUEHNE & NAGEL INC., a New York Corporation; Blue Anchor Line Division of Transpac Container System Ltd., an Unknown Foreign Entity; Nacora Insurance Brokers Inc., a New Jersey Corporation; Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., a California Insurance Corporation, Defendants. No. 98 C 2255. United States District Cour

974 F.2d 1346 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. L

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge In this criminal action, Defendant Yossi Avitan is charged with Conspiracy to Operate an Unlicensed Money Transmitting Business in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, and 1960(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C). Defendant has moved under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 1

SANDSTROM, Justice. [¶ 1] Several owners of land next to navigable waters in North Dakota appeal from summary judgments determining the State owns the mineral interests under the land in the shore zone, the area between the ordinary high and low watermarks of the navigable waters. We conclude that the State owned the mineral interests under the shore zone of navigable waters upo

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 07/02/2021 08:11 AM CDT - 895 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 308 Nebraska Reports EVERT v. SRB Cite as 308 Neb. 895 Lewis H. Evert and Trudy N. Evert,

J^WHIPPLE, J. Plaintiffs, Danny D. Bezet and Todd Moonshower, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, granting the motions for summary judgment filed by Four by Two Development, Inc. (“Four by Two Development”) and Tiger Town Associates, L.L.C. (“Tiger Town Associates”), and dismissing plaintiffs’ claims against these defendants with prejudice. For the following reasons, we stay the appeal and remand to the district court

[Cite as State v. Johnson, 2022-Ohio-81.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 110347 v. : ERIC JOHNSON, :