Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Brian Jay Smith”
Guzman v. Jaypublic domain
OPINION & ORDER ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On August 25, 2010, Plaintiff Noel Jackson Guzman (“Plaintiff’) brought this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against New York City Police Department Police Officer Brian Jay (“Officer Jay” or “Defendant”) and others alleging, among other things, false arrest and excessive force. This Court held a
Assoc. for Accessible Medicine v. Brian Froshpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2166 ASSOCIATION FOR ACCESSIBLE MEDICINES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRIAN E. FROSH, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Maryland; DENNIS R. SCHRADER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Maryland
Smith v. Statepublic domain
WM. C. HETHERINGTON, Jr., Presiding Judge. 1 1 Appellant Brian Smith (Father) appeals the order adjudicating T.S., KS., D.S., K.S., and L.S., to be deprived children. Based on our interpretation of the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C.A. § 1901 et seg. (ICWA), and the Oklahoma Indian Child Welfare Act, 10 0.8.2011 § 40.1 et seq. (OICWA), we AFFIRM. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Smith v. Raypublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER DOUGLAS E. MILLER, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, Amanda Deanne Smith (“Smith”), filed this action to recover for injuries arising from her arrest at the home of a friend on September 21, 2006. She has alleged state law tort claims, and constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 against two officers involved in the arrest, Officer R.R. Ray (“Officer Ray”) a
Brian R. Smith v. Michael Groosepublic domain
ROSS, Senior Circuit Judge. On March 14, 1988, appellant Brian Smith was convicted of two counts of first-degree assault after entering a plea of guilty and was sentenced to two consecutive twenty-year terms of imprisonment. After filing state posteonviction motions, appellant filed his petition for federal habeas corpus relief, asserting that (1) his guilty plea was involuntary
Steve Smith v. A. Hedgpethpublic domain
OPINION BYBEE, Circuit Judge: In this Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”) action we address whether clearly established federal law requires that sentencing enhancements be considered for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The district court denied Smith’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, holding
Smith v. McBridepublic domain
Cupp, J. {¶ 1} In this political-subdivision-immunity case, a township police officer was involved in a motor-vehicle accident outside his own jurisdiction while responding to a general dispatch call for assistance from an officer in another jurisdiction. *52At issue is whether the police officer can be considered to have
JAY, ESQ., ESTATE OF DAVID G., GOLEBIESKI, BRIAN vpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1085 CA 13-01767 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. BRIAN GOLEBIESKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V ORDER CITY OF BUFFALO, DEFENDANT. --------------------------------------- ESTATE OF DAVID G. JAY, ESQ., DECEASED, RESPONDENT. HOGAN WILLIG, PLLC, AMHERST (DIANE R. TIVERON OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINT
Smith v. Facebook, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 96 EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge Plaintiffs allege that the Healthcare Defendants 1 disclosed information about Plaintiffs’ web browsing activity to Defendant Facebook, Inc. Defendants move to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), and 12(b)(6). Defendants’ motion will be GRAN
People of Michigan v. Brandon Jay Smithpublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan May 21, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Smith-Thompson v. District of Columbiapublic domain
657 F.Supp.2d 123 (2009) Charline SMITH-THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. Civil Action No. 09-0046 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 28, 2009. *126 Brian J. Markovitz, Jay P. Holland, Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, P.A., Greenbelt, MD, for Plaintiff. Eric Sebastian
Jay v. Fischerpublic domain
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Rensselaer County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating various prison disciplinary rules after a search of his prison cell disclosed, among
Jay v. Fischerpublic domain
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Rensselaer County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating various prison disciplinary rules after a search of his prison cell disclosed, among
OPINION OF THE COURT ALITO, Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to interpret and apply a provision of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 402(x)(l)(A)(ii), that provides that disability insurance benefits and certain other benefits are not to be paid to a person who “is confined by court order in an institution at public expense in connection with ..
WILLIAM JAY BURNELL v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT WILLIAM JAY BURNELL, DOC #735568, ) ) Appellant, )
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISMISSAL OF VERIFIED SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT PONSOR, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a shareholder of Smith & Wesson (“S & W”), brought this derivative suit against the officers and directors of S & W Holdings, Inc, alleging, inter alia, breach of fiduciary duty. Defenda
State of Tennessee v. Jay W. Edwardspublic domain
06/22/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 18, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAY W. EDWARDS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 112890 Bob McGee, Judge No. E2019-02176-CCA-R3-CD Aggrieved o
Brian Dale Klein v. Whirlpool Corporationpublic domain
In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 25–0458 Submitted June 3, 2026—Filed June 26, 2026 Brian Dale Klein, Appellant, vs. Whirlpool Corporation, Appellee. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa Distri
State of Louisiana v. Lester Jay Ramsey, Jr.public domain
Judgment rendered February 28, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 55,491-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA
Jay Zola v. TD Ameritrade, Inc.public domain
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Jay Zola and Jeremiah Joseph Lowney (collectively, Zola), Tyler Verdieck, and Michael Sarbacker filed separate class-action complaints against TD Ameritrade, Inc., alleging various state-law claims. 1 The *922