Cases

698 F.Supp.2d 584 (2010) PREGIS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. John J. DOLL, Acting Under Secretary for Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office, and Free-Flow Packaging International, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 1:09cv467(GBL). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.</

559 F.3d 1345 (2009) Triantafyllos TAFAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Smithkline Beecham Corporation (doing business as GlaxoSmithKline), Smithkline Beecham PLC, and Glaxo Group Limited (doing business as GlaxoSmithKline), Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. John J. DOLL, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and United States Patent and Trademark Office, Defendants

MEMORANDUM OPINION EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge. This case is before the Court on defendant’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s January 27, 2012 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and denying defendant’s motion to dismiss. Upon consideration of the motion, the response and reply thereto, t

MEMORANDUM OPINION EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Kosan Biosciences Inc. filed this action on June 17, 2009 seeking review of certain patent term adjustments granted by the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). Plaintiffs alleged that all of the challenged PTO paten

517 F.Supp.2d 1273 (2007) James A. DOLL and Aimee Doll, Plaintiffs, v. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 06-2416-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 15, 2007. *1274 Austin Tighe, Feazell & Tighe, LLP, Austin, TX, Jason M. Hans, Kirk T. May, Phillip G. Greenfield, Rouse Hendricks German May PC,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge. In this diversity action, plaintiffs James and Aimee Doll, on behalf of themselves and numerous potential class members, have brought contract and tort claims against defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company (Chicago Title). Plaintiffs’ claims are based on their allegation that Chicago Title, in acting as plaintiffs’ closing agent in a re

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE WABASH COLLEGE Patrick A. Elward Thomas R. Schultz Karl L. Mulvaney Brandon M. Kimura Briana L. Clark Schultz & Pogue LLP Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP Indianapolis, Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY, Anne L. Cowgur INC. AND PHI KAPPA PSI FRA

FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE WABASH COLLEGE: PATRICK A. ELWARD KARL L. MULVANEY THOMAS R. SCHULTZ BRIANA L. CLARK Schultz & Pogue, LLP Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP Indianapolis, Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES PHI ANNE L. COWGUR KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY, INC. AND Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP PHI

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Brian Boulb filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.G. § 2255 more than one year and four months after he had been sentenced and judgment had been entered against him. Relying on § 2255’s one-year statute of limitations, the district court dismissed his petition as untimely without holding an evidentiary hearing.

Opinion issued June 25, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-01004-CR ——————————— BRIAN VICTORIAN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

ACCEPTED 01-13-01004-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:07:14 PM

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS State of West Virginia, FILED June 24, 2013 Plaintiff Below, Respondent RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEA

593 So.2d 1239 (1992) SUCCESSION OF Charlie DOLL v. Paddy Ann DOLL. Ludeweka Doll SULLIVAN v. Paddy Ann DOLL. No. 91-C-1009. Supreme Court of Louisiana. January 17, 1992. Rehearing Denied February 20, 1992. *1242 Nathan T. Gisclair, Brian T. Leftwich, David W. O'Quinn, Montgomery, Barnett, Brown, Read

SHELBOURNE, Chief Judge. This action was filed August 18, 1953 by the plaintiff, Ethel A. Doll, seeking to recover $6,748.38, together with interest, which she avers that she paid to the defendant as Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Kentucky, pursuant to a jeopardy assessment made by the Collector, for the Commissioner, under date of April 12, 1951. She alleges that the assessment was erroneous and illegal

WENTWORTH, J. This case concerns whether the Indiana Board of Tax Review erred when it determined that, for the 2009, 2010, and 2011 tax years (the “years at issue”), Charles E. Duke’s real property qualified for an educational purposes exemption, but did not qualify for a religious purposes exemption. The Court reverses the Indiana Board’s determination on the educational purpo

689 N.W.2d 184 (2004) 268 Neb. 870 In re Interest of BRIAN B. et al., children under 18 years of age. State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Justine R., appellee, and Kevin R., appellant. No. S-03-1316. Supreme Court of Nebraska. December 3, 2004. *186 Jeffrey A. Wagner, of Schirber & Wagner, L.L.P.,

*245MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PARTIALLY DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Tracey N. Wise, Bankruptcy Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Trustee’s First Amended Complaint. [ECF Nos. 25 and 25-1 (memorandum in support, hereafter the “Motion”).] In her First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 24 (“Amend

MEMORANDUM OPINION Tracey N. Wise, Bankruptcy Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Wrigley’s 7-711, Inc.’s, (“Wrigley” or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 25 (“Motion”) ] and supporting Memorandum [ECF No. 25-1 (“Memorandum”) ]. In her First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 27 (“Amended Complaint” or “AC”)], Plaintiff Phaedra Spradlin, chapter 7 trustee (“Trustee”),

WENTWORTH, J. This matter is before the Court on Belterra Resort Indiana, LLC's "Motion for Enforcement of Decision and For Order to Show Cause." The Court, being duly advised in the premises, grants Belterra's Motion. BACKGROUND On May 24, 2018, this Court issued an opinion that affirmed in part and reversed

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Tracey N. Wise, Bankruptcy Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Trustee’s First Amended Complaint. [ECF Nos. 30 and 30-1 (memorandum in support, hereafter the “Motion”).] In her First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 29 (“Amended Complaint”) ], Plaintiff Phaedra Spradlin, chapter 7 trustee (“Trustee”), on