Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Brian Burns”
Brian Burns v. Sonador Rei LLCpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-00767-COA BRIAN BURNS APPELLANT v. SONADOR REI LLC APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/02/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WILLIAM H. SINGLETARY COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CHANCERY COURT,
Brian Burns v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 22 2016, 8:31 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals the defense of res j
United States v. Brian Burnspublic domain
MAHONEY, Circuit Judge ** : Defendant-appellant Brian Burns appeals from a January 11, 1996 judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont, McAuliffe, J. (United States District Judge for the District of New Hampshire, sitting by designation), convicting him of wire fraud, i
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-17-00265-CV ____________________ MINDA LAO TOLEDO, Appellant V. KBMT OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, KBMT LICENSE COMPANY, LLC, BRIAN BURNS, JACKIE SIMIEN AND TRACY
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 14-0456 ══════════ KBMT OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, KBMT LICENSE COMPANY, LLC, BRIAN BURNS, JACKIE SIMIEN AND TRACY KENNICK, PETITIONERS, v. MINDA LAO TOLEDO, RESPONDENT ════════════════════════════════════
ACCEPTED 09-17-00265-CV NINTH COURT OF APPEALS BEAUMONT, TEXAS 1/9/2018 12:12 PM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 14-0456 444444444444 KBMT OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, KBMT LICENSE COMPANY, LLC, BRIAN BURNS, JACKIE SIMIEN AND TRACY KENNICK, PETITIONERS, v. MINDA LAO TOLEDO, RESPONDENT 444
OPINION CHARLES KREGER, Justice. In this accelerated interlocutory appeal we must determine whether the trial court erred in failing to dismiss a physician’s defamation claim and award attorneys’ fees to the media defendants under the Texas Citizens Participation Act (“TCPA”). See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. §§ 27.001-011 (Wes
[{000214A0-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}] Prop3=19,2 [InternetShortcut] URL=http://texassupremecourt.mediasite.com/mediasite/Play/b28dee0b466f48cbb2e1c4fde6748c731d IDList= IconFile=http://texassupremecourt.mediasite.com/favicon.ico IconIndex=1
Pacherille v. Burnspublic domain
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER GARY L. SHARPE, Chief Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiff Tony Pacherille commenced this action against defendant Brian Burns,1 individually and as an Otsego County Court Judge, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of his First and Fourth Amendment rights. (Am. Compl., Dkt. No. 22.) Pending is Judge
Burns v. Burnspublic domain
HENDRICKSON, P.J. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Kristin L. Burns n.k.a. Clendenen ("Mother"), appeals from a decision of the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, dismissing her motion to hold defendant-appellee, Brian K. Burns ("Father"), in contempt. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the trial court's decision. {¶ 2} Mother's and Fat
People v. Burnspublic domain
*728Opinion NICHOLSON, J. Defendant Dwayne Brian Bums went into someone else’s home at around 4:00 in the morning looking for a woman with whom he had a “quasi-romantic” and “quasi-sexual” relationship. When he found her in the bed of one of the residents of the home, he pepper sprayed two of the residents. Convicted, after two trials, of misdemeanor car
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Jun 28 2017, 6:31 am Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the CLERK Indiana Supreme Court purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata,
Burns v. Martuscellopublic domain
POOLER, Circuit Judge: *81Plaintiff-Appellant Mark Burns appeals from a February 10, 2015 decision and order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Kahn, J .), adopting the report-recommendation of the magistrate judge (Hummel, M.J. ) in its entirety, and granting summary judgment to defendants
State v. Burnspublic domain
278 P.3d 452 (2012) 2012 MT 97 365 Mont. 27 STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Brandon BURNS, Defendant and Appellant. No. DA 11-0570. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs February 29, 2012. Decided May 1, 2012. For Appellant: Brandon Burns, self-represented, Deer Lodge, Montana.
State v. Burnspublic domain
PER CURIAM Defendant appeals an order that found he had violated the conditions of his probation, that imposed a six-month jail sanction for the violations, and that extended his probation to October 23, 2002. He argues that the court erred in imposing a probation sanction and extending his probation without obtaining a valid waiver of his right to counsel. The state concedes the trial court erred but argues that we should dismis
Wade v. Burnspublic domain
III. CONCLUSION The Commissioner's Motion to Remand, [Doc. 9], is GRANTED, and this action is remanded back to the State of Connecticut Department of Insurance. This Ruling neither expresses nor intimates any view on the merits. As there are no remaining claims in this matter, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. It is SO ORDERED.
Malo v. Burnspublic domain
MINORA, J., INTRODUCTION Before this court is plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and request for expedited hearing on plaintiff’s damages. The motion for partial summary judgment is granted. Plaintiff’s request for an expedited hearing on damages is scheduled before this court on June 20, 2013 at 9:30am. FACTUAL SUMMARY Contract Between Defendant
Burns v. McCabepublic domain
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Eugene M. Fahey, J.), entered November 25, 2003 in a personal injury action. The order granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and cross motion for preclusion. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for injuries alleg
43 F.3d 1482 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Br