Cases

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 30, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice 156944

413 U.S. 189 (1973) KEYES ET AL. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, DENVER, COLORADO, ET AL. No. 71-507. Supreme Court of the United States. Argued October 12, 1972. Decided June 21, 1973. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT *190 James M. Nabrit III and Gordon G. Greiner ar

SHERRY RADACK CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CHIEF JUSTICE CLERK OF THE COURT TERRY JENNINGS JANET WILLIAMS EVELYN KEYES CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY LAURA CARTER HIGLEY JANE BLAND MICHAEL MASSENGALE Court of Appeals

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BRIAN WILSON, § § No. 201, 2020 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. N1901009072 STATE OF DELAWARE, §

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) v. ) ID No. 1901009072 ) BRIAN WILSON, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Upon Consideration of Defendant’s Motion for a New Trial o

669 S.E.2d 98 (2008) SMITH v. The STATE. Lightburn v. The State. Nos. S08A1496, S08A1581. Supreme Court of Georgia. November 3, 2008. *101 Brian Steel, Atlanta, for appellant. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming, District Attorney, Daniel J. Quinn, Assistant District Attorney, Barbara B. Conroy, Deputy Chief Assistant Dist

Opinion issued September 21, 2006. In The Court of Appeals For The

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT BERGERON ENVIRONMENTAL AND RECYCLING, LLC, Appellant, v. LGL RECYCLING, LLC, WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. OF FLORIDA, ANTHONY LOMANGINO, CHARLES GUSMANO, and JOHN CASAGRANDE, Appellees. Nos. 4D2022-2159 & 4D2022-3155 [October 9,

DECISION AND ORDER LISA MARGARET SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs Amey Cooper and Gregory Smith commenced this action against Defendants City of New Rochelle, Detective Michael O’Rourke, Detective John Pastore, Police Officers John Doe Numbers 1-5, Police Officer Jane Doe, and Detective John Doe, asserting federal claims for unreasonable search and seizure, false arrest, malici

Filed 5/13/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN ELAINE ALVES et al., B338413 Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 23STCP00999) v. SHIRLEY N. WEBER, as Secretary of State, etc., Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the

679 F.Supp.2d 192 (2010) ROBERT E. RICCIARDELLI CARPET SERVICE, INC. v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., John St. Lawrence, and Brian Worcester. Civil Action No. 08-10756. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 15, 2010. *195 David J. Andrews, Hare & Chaffin, David B. Chaffin, White and Williams LLP, Boston, MA, for

Opinion Issued October 15, 2009 In The Court of Appeals For The First Dis

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. I.INTRODUCTION This action arises out of an altercation between the plaintiffs and various Brock-ton police officers on November 15, 2008. The plaintiffs have asserted claims for violations of their federal and state constitutional rights as well as vi

981 P.2d 616 (1998) Daniel W. OSBAND; Nancy H. Abbott; Ronald V. Abruzzo; Darryl K. Allen; Kim M. Alt; Dolores J. Arbuthnot; Charles W. Beamer; Jeffrey C. Benson; Darrel C. Bryant; Catherine F. Buhler; Lynn Butler; Christine Opiol Caffey; Richard C. Caldwell; Karen Chavez; Angela H. Chiu; Carmen Chong; Christa Ciancio; David A. Clouse; David B. Coover; James O. Cox, III; Scott DeMattio; Thomas Dembeck; Philip G. Derkum; Robert J. Dethlefs; R. James Ditte

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge. INTRODUCTION This case challenges the constitutionality of the statutes governing civil commitment and treatment of sex offenders in Minnesota as written and as applied, and in so doing, challenges the boundaries that we the people set on the notions of individual liberty and freedom, the bedrock principl

2023 IL App (5th) 230035 NOTICE Decision filed 01/31/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0035 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________________________________________________________

191 B.R. 489 (1996) In the Matter of Eddie Lee GRAHAM, Debtor. Harry M. LEAGUE, Plaintiff, v. Eddie Lee GRAHAM, Defendant, v. U.S. POSTAMATIC, INC. and Herbert M. Schwartz, Third-Party Defendants. Bankruptcy No. A91-71114-WHD. Adv. No. 92-6311A. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. January 16, 1996.

514 F.2d 646 Anthony T. LEE, et al., Plaintiffs,United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor and AmicusCuriae Appellant,National Education Association, Inc., Plaintiff-Intervenor,v.AUTAUGA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 75-1297. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. May 27, 1975.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER ERIC POORE, Defendant and Appellant. S104665 Riverside County Superior Court INF-033308 June 27, 2022 Justice Corrigan authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Canti

Appellate Case: 23-3264 Document: 133-1 Date Filed: 01/29/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH January 29, 2026