⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Brenda Robertson”

Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016-12-27 · Published · cited 0× · 197 Wash. App. 334; 387 P.3d 1147
Verellen, C. J. ¶ 1 We are asked to reconcile whether the “Homestead Act,” 1 “Redemption Act,” 2 and Condominium Act 3 together allow a condominium owner to possess a condominium without paying rent during
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017-09-28 · Published · cited 18× · 576 B.R. 684
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Wendy L. Hagenau U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge This adversary proceeding under Sections 727 and 523 of the Bankruptcy Code comes before the Court on Plaintiff RES-GA Diamond Meadows, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 78] and Defendant Brenda Kay Robertson’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 76], The adversary p
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015-04-14 · Published · cited 0×
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ April 14, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A15A1475. BRENDA A. ROBERTSON v. KARL STANLEY CLARK. On January 6, 2015, the trial court entered judgment in favor of Brenda Robertson against Karl Stanley Clark. On February 6, 2015, Robertson filed a notice of appeal. We lack jurisdiction because the
Hale v. Robertsonpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 60 S.W.3d 686; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1750; 2001 WL 1151193
PREWITT, Judge. David William Robertson (“Appellant”) appeals from a judgment entered August 17, 2000 in favor of Betty L. Hale, personal *688representative of the estate of Brenda J. Robertson, (“Respondent”) finding an ante-nuptial agreement executed by Appellant and Brenda J. Robertson (“Decedent”) valid and enforceable, thereby barring Appellant as surviving spous
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015-10-14 · Published · cited 6× · 177 So. 3d 785; 15 La.App. 5 Cir. 240; 2015 La. App. LEXIS 2022; 2015 WL 6087171
HANS J. LILJEBERG, Judge. | .Appellants1 seek review of the trial court’s judgment .granting the exception of no cause of action filed by appellee, St. John the Baptist Parish (the “Parish”), as well as the judgment granting the joint motion for summary judgment filed by appellees, Praxair, Inc., Willbros Group, Inc., Willbros United States Holdings, Inc., Willbros Construction (US), LLC and Will
Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2000-04-25 · Published · cited 6× · 609 N.W.2d 409; 9 Neb. Ct. App. 193; 2000 Neb. App. LEXIS 123
609 N.W.2d 409 (2000) 9 Neb. App. 193 Edward VIEREGGER and Brenda Vieregger, individually and as parents and next friends of Blake Vieregger, a minor, appellants, v. Andrew ROBERTSON, M.D., and Michael Levine, M.D., appellees. No. A-99-058. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. April 25, 2000. *411 James E. Harris
Pyle v. Robertsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993-07-05 · Published · cited 15× · 858 S.W.2d 662; 313 Ark. 692; 1993 Ark. LEXIS 440
Robert L. Brown, Justice, dissenting. I question whether the abstracting in this case is so flagrantly deficient under Supreme Court Rule 4-2(b)(2) as to warrant an affirmance on all issues. The Robertsons certainly did not think so, as they did not raise the issue. The majority does so on its own. I specifically question the majority’s assertion that Brenda Pyle did not abstract the affidavits attached to
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-05-22 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-0899 _____________________________ BRENDA WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Donna M. Keim, Judge. May 22, 2019 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and
United States Court of Military Appeals · 1994-05-31 · Published · cited 23× · 39 M.J. 211; 1994 CMA LEXIS 17; 1994 WL 228478
Opinion of the Court CRAWFORD, Judge: Contrary to his pleas, appellant was found guilty, by a general court-martial with members, of using cocaine, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 912a. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 6 months, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved the sen
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992-07-20 · Published · cited 9× · 972 F.2d 529; 1992 WL 166002
OPINION MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs, later certified as a class consisting of all Virginia residents who have applied for, attempted to apply for, or will request food stamps, filed an action on April 15, 1991, in the United States District *530Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, against the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Social S
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980-09-25 · Published · cited 2× · 608 S.W.2d 245; 1980 Tex. App. LEXIS 3922
608 S.W.2d 245 (1980) Levi ROBERTSON, Appellant, v. Brenda ROBERTSON et al., Appellees. No. 5520. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Eastland. September 25, 1980. *246 Jimmy Stewart, Goodwin & Berry, San Angelo, for appellant. Lance C. Hall, Moore, Dickson, Roberts & Hall, Inc., Sweetwater, for appellees. McCL
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2016-05-04 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-16-00066-CR BRENDA DAVIS INGRAM, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 82nd District Court Robertson County, Texas Trial Court No. 15-03-20050-CR Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
U S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992-06-11 · Published · cited 0× · 34 M.J. 1206; 1992 CMR LEXIS 569; 1992 WL 136411
OPINION OF THE COURT JAMES, Judge: Technical Sergeant Robertson was convicted of having used cocaine.1 On review he appeals two rulings on evidence, the instructions on findings, and the effectiveness of the post-trial representation he received. We find errors but no prejudice, and we affirm.2 I. Impeachment By Arrest <
Supreme Court of Virginia · 1995-01-13 · Published · cited 18× · 452 S.E.2d 845; 249 Va. 72; 1995 Va. LEXIS 6
452 S.E.2d 845 (1995) Brenda E. ROBERTSON v. METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORT AUTHORITY, et al. Record No. 940122. Supreme Court of Virginia. January 13, 1995. Tracey S. Brinkman, Fairfax (William L. Schmidt, Marco A. Lopez, William L. Schmidt & Associates, Springfield, on briefs), for appellant. Melissa S. Hogue, Fairfax (John D. McGavin, Lewis, Trichilo,
Fine v. Mainellapublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003-09-11 · Published · cited 0× · 75 F. App'x 2
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellants. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s judgment be affirmed. A writ of mandamus is available to compel an officer or employee of the United Stat
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991-06-05 · Published · cited 11× · 766 F. Supp. 470; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7639; 1991 WL 95886
766 F.Supp. 470 (1991) Joyce ROBERTSON, et al. individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Larry D. JACKSON, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Social Services, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 3:91CV00197. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. June 5, 1991.
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2016-06-29 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE TO THE 82ND DISTRICT COURT OF ROBERTSON COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 4th day of May, A.D. 2016, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words: Brenda Davis Ingram, Appellant No. 06-16-00066-CR
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2016-05-04 · Published · cited 0×
Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas JUDGMENT Brenda Davis Ingram, Appellant Appeal from the 82nd District Court of Robertson County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 15-03- No. 06-16-00066-CR v. 20050-CR). Memorandum Opinion deliv
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019-01-25 · Published · cited 179× · 914 F.3d 535
Manion, Circuit Judge. Brenda Lear Scheidler worked for the Indiana Department of Insurance ("IDOI"). She sought accommodations for disabilities related to her mental health. She asked, among other things, that her coworkers not startle her. She received these accommodations for several years. But on May 28, 2013, a frustrated supervisor reached toward Scheidler and said, "I could just
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019-01-25 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-2543 BRENDA LEAR SCHEIDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF INDIANA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the S