Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “Bremer Bank, National Association v. Border Bank”
352 B.R. 103 (2006) In re SRC HOLDING CORPORATION, a/k/a, Miller & Schroeder, Inc. and its subsidiaries, Debtor. Bremer Business Finance Corporation and Brian F. Leonard, Trustee, Plaintiffs, v. Dorsey & Whitney LLP, a Minnesota Limited Liability Partnership, Defendant. and McIntosh County Bank, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Dorsey & Whitney LLP, a Minnesota Limited Liability Partnership, Defendant. Bank
No. 2--09--0271 Filed: 1-27-10 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ KEVIN F. GALLAGHER, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of La
Unander v. United States National Bankpublic domain
224 Or. 144 (1960) 355 P.2d 729 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF HOPKIN JENKINS, DECEASED UNANDER v. UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK ET AL Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued June 16, 1960. Reversed October 5, 1960. *145 William E. Dougherty, Special Assistant Attorney General, Portland, argued the cause
Corbett v. County of Lakepublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and
922 N.E.2d 1201 (2010) Kevin F. GALLAGHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNION SQUARE CONDOMINIUM HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, Vanguard Community Management, Inc., Indiv. and as an Agent of Union, and Landscapes Concept Management, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 2-09-0271. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. January 27, 2010. *1203
Corbett v. The County of Lakepublic domain
JUSTICE BURKE delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. *391 ¶ 1 At issue in this appeal is the meaning of section 3-107(b) of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (Act) ( 745 ILCS 10/3-107(b) (West 2012)). The plaintiff filed a complaint at law in the
Athens v. McClain (Slip Opinion)public domain
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Athens v. McClain, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-5146.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or oth
Haaland v. Brackeenpublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Haaland v. Brackeenpublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 599 U. S. Part 1 Pages 255–381 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 15, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Karcher v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TIMOTHY KARCHER, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 16-232 (CKK) v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 3, 2026) Pursuant to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”), on February 12, 2016, over 300 Pla
State v. Allenpublic domain
778 N.W.2d 863 (2010) 2010 WI 10 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Aaron Antonio ALLEN, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. No. 2007AP000795. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Decided February 11, 2010. ¶ 1 PER CURIAM. The members of the court disagree as to the disposition of petitioner Aaron Antonio Allen's motions for the recusal o
In re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
*1277MEMORANDUM OPINION This document relates to both tracks R. DAVID PROCTOR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1. Introduction This case is before the court on five Motions to Dismiss (e.g., Docs. #208, 210, 211, 212, 213, Case No. 2:12-cv-02169-RDP) that have been filed by nine of the thirty-eigh
Johnson v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION MAYER, Judge. The questions presented in this case are whether the transaction for the sale and leaseback of computer equipment is a “sham” for tax purposes, and whether it qualifies under section 183 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as an activity engaged in for profit. Background During the years 1979-81, plaintiffs William J. and Marie L. Johnson were marr
Liddell v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO.public domain
696 F.Supp. 444 (1988) Craton LIDDELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO., et al., Defendants. No. 72-100 C (5). United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D. August 4, 1988. Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Denied September 22, 1988. *445 *4
State v. Carrpublic domain
SANBORN, Circuit Judge. The state of Iowa and Jessie W. Han-nan, who is the grantee of Charles R. Hannan, one of the original defendants, appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court which quiets the title of the complainants below to the lands which are the subject of this suit, and enjoins the defendants and the state of Iowa, which intervened in the suit, from claiming or asserting any title thereto adverse to that of the complai
In re Estate of McCombspublic domain
OPINION By LOVE, J: This cause came on to be heard upon the application of Ben Atkinson, legatee under the will of Melvorne J. McCombs, deceased, and independent executor of the estate of said decedent, appointed as such by the County Court of the County of Dallas, Texas, briefs of counsel, and the evidence. The Court has before it a complete transcript of the evidence, it having previo
United States v. Aluminum Co. of Americapublic domain
44 F.Supp. 97 (1941) UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA et al. Eq. No. 85-73. District Court, S. D. New York. September 30, October 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, 1941. *98 *99 *100 *101