Cases

968 N.E.2d 340 (2012) BRAVO v. BRAVO. No. 54A01-1108-PL-354. Court of Appeals of Indiana. May 9, 2012. BROWN, J. Disposition of Case by Unpublished Memorandum Decision Affirmed. BAKER, J. and KIRSCH, J., Concurs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROSA ACOSTA, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 24-03167 (AHA) v. BRAVO BRAVO, INC., et al., Defendants. Memorandum Opinion Plaintiffs allege that Defendants misappropriated their photographs to advertise a nightclub.

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00459-CV ___________________________ KELLUS JOSEPH BRAVO, Appellant V. CORRAIMA BRAVO, Appellee On Appeal from the 360th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 360-722565-22 Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opini

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-24-00459-CV KELLUS JOSEPH BRAVO, Appellant § On Appeal from the 360th District Court § of Tarrant County (360-722565-22) V. § January 9, 2025 CORRAIMA BRAVO, Appellee

FILED FOR PUBLICATION DEC 2 2022 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICARDO BRAVO-BRAVO,

326 September 10, 2025 No. 803 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOSE LAHDIEL BRAVO-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Respondent. Multnomah County Circuit Court 23CR05259; A184815 Cheryl A. Albrecht, Judge. Argued and submitted January 28, 2025. Doug M. Petrina, Assistant Attorn

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICARDO BRAVO-BRAVO, No. 20-71042 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A075-265-535 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Filed 1/7/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A168580 v. EDDIE ARTURO BRAVO, (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. 05000705947) Defendant and Appellant.

Tapia v Bravo (2024 NY Slip Op 05077) Tapia v Bravo 2024 NY Slip Op 05077 Decided on October 15, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

326 September 10, 2025 No. 803 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOSE LAHDIEL BRAVO-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Respondent. Multnomah County Circuit Court 23CR05259; A184815 Cheryl A. Albrecht, Judge. Argued and submitted January 28, 2025. Doug M. Petrina, Assistant Attorn

Cite as 28 I&N Dec. 388 (BIA 2021) Interim Decision #4028 Matter of Josefina ARAMBULA-BRAVO, Respondent Decided September 23, 2021 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) A Notice to Appear that does not specify the time and place of a respondent’s initial removal hearing does not deprive th

Filed 12/23/20 See Concurring Opinion CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E072782 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF75184) ESTEBAN ZARATE BRAVO, OPINION Defendant and Appell

Bravo v Benish (2021 NY Slip Op 06669) Bravo v Benish 2021 NY Slip Op 06669 Decided on December 1, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

USCA11 Case: 23-12511 Document: 66-1 Date Filed: 06/23/2025 Page: 1 of 28 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-12511 ____________________ RAQUEL CAMPS, in he

Filed 10/4/21 (opinion following transfer from Supreme Court) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E072782 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF75184) ESTEBAN ZARATE BRAVO,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA24-1008 Filed 16 July 2025 Mecklenburg County, No. 21CVD013113-590 KIYA CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. BRAVO 4 AUTOWORKS LLC, Defendant. Appeal by plaintiff from order entered 13 July 2022 by Judge Paulina N. Havelka and order entered 11 July 2024 by Judge Roy H. Wiggins in Mecklenburg County District Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 21 M

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) STATE V. BRAVO NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, V.

LILJEBERG, J, | defendant appeals his conviction for sexual battery upon a juvenile under the age of thirteen. For the following reasons, we affirm.. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On September 23, 2015, the Jefferson Parish District Attorney filed a bill of information charging defendant, Alejandro Bravo, with sexual battery upon a juvenile under the age of thirteen by touching the vi

STOWERS, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs/appellants are an adult daughter believed to be incompetent and her mother. After retaining counsel, the mother brought a tort action as the daughter's next friend for in utero injuries to the daughter, which the mother alleged were caused almost 20 years previously in a boating a

Per Curiam. AFFIRMED. Makar, Osterhaus, and Jay, JJ., concur.