Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Brashear v. Aetna Life Insurance Co”
Alcoa v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.public domain
998 P.2d 856 (2000) 140 Wash.2d 517 ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA; and Northwest Alloys, Inc., Appellants, v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY; Aiu Insurance Company; Allianz Underwriters Insurance Company (formerly known as Allianz Underwriters, Inc.); Allianz Versicherungs-Aktiengesellschaft; Allstate Insurance Company(as successor-in-interest to Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance Company which was formerly known a
Talmadge, J. We are asked in this case to apply the law of Pennsylvania to resolve disputes between the Aluminum Company of America, its subsidiary Northwest Alloys, Inc. (Alcoa), and 167 insurers regarding insurance coverage for *521environmental damage under comprehensive general liability (CGL) policies and property insurance policies called differences in conditions (
Ellegood v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc.public domain
This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by Norman W. Ellegood, while employed on the premises of the appellant, Brashear Freight Lines, Inc. The suit was filed against appellant and Harold Curtis, but at the close of plaintiff's case the court directed a verdict for defendant Curtis, and the cause proceeded against appellant as the sole remaining defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. The alleged accident occurred on August 31, 1936
Wiener v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New Yorkpublic domain
This is an action by Dr. Wiener to recover disability benefits under an insurance policy. The jury found for the insurance company. The judges of the St. Louis Court of Appeals were divided, so the case was transferred to this Court. 170 S.W.2d 174. We hear the case anew. Dr. Wiener was an active medical practitioner for forty years and had become a recognized leader in his specialty, diseases of the eye. He had a large office practice where he examined, diagnosed, treated and advised
GIBSON, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff Naoma R. Gill seeks to recover the proceeds of a certificate of group life insurance issued under a master policy by General American Life Insurance Company to the Trustees of the Arkansas Missouri Cotton Ginners Association covering the life of her deceased husband, Lester B. Gill. Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship. From
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT TERRENCE F. McVERRY, Senior District Judge. Pending before the Court is a MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 196) filed by Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railroad and Power REIT; a MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 198) filed by Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Wh
Travelers Insurance Co. v. Great American Indem. Co.public domain
113 So.2d 815 (1959) TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GREAT AMERICAN INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4865. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. June 30, 1959. Christovich & Kearney, New Orleans, for appellant. Reid & Macy, Hammond, for appellee. Before ELLIS, LOTTINGER and TATE, JJ. ELLIS, Judge.
Nix v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.public domain
94 So.2d 457 (1957) Joseph A. NIX et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellant. No. 4360. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. March 25, 1957. Rehearing Denied May 2, 1957. *458 Plauche & Stockwell, Lake Charles, for appellant. Russell T. Tritico, Ralph
STONE, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from judgment (on jury waived trial) in favor of the executors of Clarence R. Comfort for disability benefits under and return of premiums on two life insurance policies issued by appellant in 1921. The disability and premium waiver provisions are identical in the policies except for amounts (concerning which there is no issue). In 1930, insured made, claims for disabi
JAMESON, Senior District Judge. Appellant, The Buehler Corporation, brought this action ¡to recover for the loss by fire of a building owned by it and covered by three' insurance policies issued by appellees, The Home Insurance Company, Glens Falls Insurance Company, and Great American Insurance Company. Most of the facts were sti
Norton v. Argonaut Insurance Companypublic domain
144 So.2d 249 (1962) Glynace H. NORTON et al. v. ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY et al. No. 5601. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. June 29, 1962. Rehearing Denied September 25, 1962. *250 Taylor, Porter, Brooks, Fuller & Phillips, by F. W. Middleton, Jr., Kantrow, Spaht & Kleinpeter, by Robert L. K
Batman, J. Appellee commenced a separate action against each of appellants to recover on certain fire insurance policies issued by them and held by it, covering the same property and destroyed by the same fire. These actions were each put at issue on the part of appellants by filing their respective answers in general denial, and also affirmative paragraphs, predicated on certain stipulations in the policies in suit. The only o
Nolan v. Joplin Transfer & Storage Co.public domain
We shall refer to appellant as defendant and respondent as plaintiff in the course of this opinion. Plaintiff instituted this suit by filing a petition, April 23, 1945, in the Jasper County Circuit Court, asking for damages for personal injuries in the sum of $25,000. Defendant, in due time, filed his answer and plea to the jurisdiction. Subsequently, on a trial to a jury, a verdict was returned for plaintiff and against the defendant for $5,000. Being unsuccessful in its motion for a
Old Republic Insurance Company v. Begleypublic domain
314 S.W.2d 552 (1958) OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Olive BEGLEY, Individually, and for Margaret Ann Begley, et al., Appellees. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. June 20, 1958. *553 Maxwell P. Barrett, Willis W. Reeves, Hazard, for appellant. Robert Muncy, A. E. Cornett, Hyden, for appellees. STANLEY, Commissioner. <
Devine v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.public domain
In this reassigned cause the Kroger Grocery Baking Company appeal from a $10,000.00 personal injury judgment in favor of Dorothy Devine. The suit was originally against Kroger Grocery Baking Company, Henry Boemler, the manager of the store at Eureka, Missouri, and John Fromm, the owner of the building. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the respondent's petition as to Fromm and the case was then dismissed as to him. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Boemler and against the
Fitzgerald v. Fisher Body St. Louis Co.public domain
Respondent brought this proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Law seeking an award of compensation for the death of her husband, John C. Fitzgerald, alleged to have been caused by an occupational disease contracted while he was in the employ of the appellant, Fisher Body St. Louis Company, Kansas City Division. The commission heard the claim, awarded compensation to claimant. The employer and insurer appealed to the circuit court, where the award was affirmed. They have appealed.
State Ex Rel. McGrew Coal Co. v. Raglandpublic domain
* NOTE: Opinion filed at May Term, 1936, July 2, 1936; motion for rehearing filed; motion overruled at September Term, October 2, 1936. Original proceeding in mandamus commenced on August 31, 1932, and submitted at the present term of this court, to compel the clerk of the Circuit Court of Lafayette County to issue an execution on a judgment that was rendered in said court on February 15, 1924, in the sum of $18,730.99
In re the Complaint of Consolidation Coal Co.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER MARSH, District Judge. The petitioner, Consolidation Coal Company, brought this action in the Northern District of West Virginia for exoneration from or limitation of liability with respect to accidents which occurred in the Monongahela River near Lock No. 5. A monition issued and two claims were filed under the Wrongful Death and Survival statutes of Pennsylvania: one by George L. Dearth,
Randall v. Baton Rouge Bus Co.public domain
114 So.2d 98 (1959) Kirby H. RANDALL et al. v. BATON ROUGE BUS CO., Inc., et al. No. 4847. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. June 30, 1959. Rehearing Denied August 31, 1959. Certiorari Granted October 9, 1959. *99 Taylor, Porter, Brooks, Fuller & Phillips, Frank W. Middleton, Dale,
Ibach, J. — Appellants sued to recover for a loss by fire, on a policy of insurance issued to them by appellee, a mutual insurance company organized and doing business in this State under §4819 Burns 1908, §3774 R. S. 1881. Error is assigned in overruling the separate demurrers of plaintiffs to the second paragraph of defendant’s amended answer, and in sustaining a demurrer to the second and third paragraphs of