⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Brashear v. Aetna Life Insurance Co”

Washington Supreme Court · 2000-05-04 · Published · cited 119× · 998 P.2d 856
998 P.2d 856 (2000) 140 Wash.2d 517 ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA; and Northwest Alloys, Inc., Appellants, v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY; Aiu Insurance Company; Allianz Underwriters Insurance Company (formerly known as Allianz Underwriters, Inc.); Allianz Versicherungs-Aktiengesellschaft; Allstate Insurance Company(as successor-in-interest to Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance Company which was formerly known a
Washington Supreme Court · 2000-05-04 · Published · cited 113× · 140 Wash. 2d 517
Talmadge, J. We are asked in this case to apply the law of Pennsylvania to resolve disputes between the Aluminum Company of America, its subsidiary Northwest Alloys, Inc. (Alcoa), and 167 insurers regarding insurance coverage for *521environmental damage under comprehensive general liability (CGL) policies and property insurance policies called differences in conditions (
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1942-06-02 · Published · cited 38× · 162 S.W.2d 628; 236 Mo. App. 971; 1942 Mo. App. LEXIS 178
This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by Norman W. Ellegood, while employed on the premises of the appellant, Brashear Freight Lines, Inc. The suit was filed against appellant and Harold Curtis, but at the close of plaintiff's case the court directed a verdict for defendant Curtis, and the cause proceeded against appellant as the sole remaining defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. The alleged accident occurred on August 31, 1936
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944-03-06 · Published · cited 47× · 179 S.W.2d 39; 352 Mo. 673; 1944 Mo. LEXIS 533
This is an action by Dr. Wiener to recover disability benefits under an insurance policy. The jury found for the insurance company. The judges of the St. Louis Court of Appeals were divided, so the case was transferred to this Court. 170 S.W.2d 174. We hear the case anew. Dr. Wiener was an active medical practitioner for forty years and had become a recognized leader in his specialty, diseases of the eye. He had a large office practice where he examined, diagnosed, treated and advised
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970-12-11 · Published · cited 12× · 434 F.2d 1057; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6001
GIBSON, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff Naoma R. Gill seeks to recover the proceeds of a certificate of group life insurance issued under a master policy by General American Life Insurance Company to the Trustees of the Arkansas Missouri Cotton Ginners Association covering the life of her deceased husband, Lester B. Gill. Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship. From
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015-04-22 · Published · cited 1× · 101 F. Supp. 3d 497; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53086; 2015 WL 1859127
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT TERRENCE F. McVERRY, Senior District Judge. Pending before the Court is a MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 196) filed by Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railroad and Power REIT; a MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 198) filed by Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Wh
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1959-06-30 · Published · cited 3× · 113 So. 2d 815; 1959 La. App. LEXIS 1239
113 So.2d 815 (1959) TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GREAT AMERICAN INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4865. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. June 30, 1959. Christovich & Kearney, New Orleans, for appellant. Reid & Macy, Hammond, for appellee. Before ELLIS, LOTTINGER and TATE, JJ. ELLIS, Judge.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1957-03-25 · Published · cited 9× · 94 So. 2d 457; 1957 La. App. LEXIS 1055
94 So.2d 457 (1957) Joseph A. NIX et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellant. No. 4360. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. March 25, 1957. Rehearing Denied May 2, 1957. *458 Plauche & Stockwell, Lake Charles, for appellant. Russell T. Tritico, Ralph
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944-06-12 · Published · cited 0× · 143 F.2d 397; 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3092
STONE, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from judgment (on jury waived trial) in favor of the executors of Clarence R. Comfort for disability benefits under and return of premiums on two life insurance policies issued by appellant in 1921. The disability and premium waiver provisions are identical in the policies except for amounts (concerning which there is no issue). In 1930, insured made, claims for disabi
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974-04-30 · Published · cited 8× · 495 F.2d 1211
JAMESON, Senior District Judge. Appellant, The Buehler Corporation, brought this action ¡to recover for the loss by fire of a building owned by it and covered by three' insurance policies issued by appellees, The Home Insurance Company, Glens Falls Insurance Company, and Great American Insurance Company. Most of the facts were sti
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962-06-29 · Published · cited 19× · 144 So. 2d 249; 1962 La. App. LEXIS 2237
144 So.2d 249 (1962) Glynace H. NORTON et al. v. ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY et al. No. 5601. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. June 29, 1962. Rehearing Denied September 25, 1962. *250 Taylor, Porter, Brooks, Fuller & Phillips, by F. W. Middleton, Jr., Kantrow, Spaht & Kleinpeter, by Robert L. K
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917-10-09 · Published · cited 0× · 65 Ind. App. 330; 117 N.E. 273; 1917 Ind. App. LEXIS 132
Batman, J. Appellee commenced a separate action against each of appellants to recover on certain fire insurance policies issued by them and held by it, covering the same property and destroyed by the same fire. These actions were each put at issue on the part of appellants by filing their respective answers in general denial, and also affirmative paragraphs, predicated on certain stipulations in the policies in suit. The only o
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1947-06-25 · Published · cited 3× · 203 S.W.2d 740; 239 Mo. App. 915; 1947 Mo. App. LEXIS 353
We shall refer to appellant as defendant and respondent as plaintiff in the course of this opinion. Plaintiff instituted this suit by filing a petition, April 23, 1945, in the Jasper County Circuit Court, asking for damages for personal injuries in the sum of $25,000. Defendant, in due time, filed his answer and plea to the jurisdiction. Subsequently, on a trial to a jury, a verdict was returned for plaintiff and against the defendant for $5,000. Being unsuccessful in its motion for a
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958-06-20 · Published · cited 6× · 314 S.W.2d 552; 1958 Ky. LEXIS 309
314 S.W.2d 552 (1958) OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Olive BEGLEY, Individually, and for Margaret Ann Begley, et al., Appellees. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. June 20, 1958. *553 Maxwell P. Barrett, Willis W. Reeves, Hazard, for appellant. Robert Muncy, A. E. Cornett, Hyden, for appellees. STANLEY, Commissioner. <
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942-05-05 · Published · cited 53× · 162 S.W.2d 813; 349 Mo. 621; 1942 Mo. LEXIS 508
In this reassigned cause the Kroger Grocery Baking Company appeal from a $10,000.00 personal injury judgment in favor of Dorothy Devine. The suit was originally against Kroger Grocery Baking Company, Henry Boemler, the manager of the store at Eureka, Missouri, and John Fromm, the owner of the building. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the respondent's petition as to Fromm and the case was then dismissed as to him. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Boemler and against the
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1939-05-29 · Published · cited 5× · 130 S.W.2d 975; 234 Mo. App. 269; 1939 Mo. App. LEXIS 58
Respondent brought this proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Law seeking an award of compensation for the death of her husband, John C. Fitzgerald, alleged to have been caused by an occupational disease contracted while he was in the employ of the appellant, Fisher Body St. Louis Company, Kansas City Division. The commission heard the claim, awarded compensation to claimant. The employer and insurer appealed to the circuit court, where the award was affirmed. They have appealed.
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936-10-02 · Published · cited 24× · 97 S.W.2d 113; 339 Mo. 452; 1936 Mo. LEXIS 668
* NOTE: Opinion filed at May Term, 1936, July 2, 1936; motion for rehearing filed; motion overruled at September Term, October 2, 1936. Original proceeding in mandamus commenced on August 31, 1932, and submitted at the present term of this court, to compel the clerk of the Circuit Court of Lafayette County to issue an execution on a judgment that was rendered in said court on February 15, 1924, in the sum of $18,730.99
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968-09-20 · Published · cited 0× · 296 F. Supp. 837; 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8440
OPINION AND ORDER MARSH, District Judge. The petitioner, Consolidation Coal Company, brought this action in the Northern District of West Virginia for exoneration from or limitation of liability with respect to accidents which occurred in the Monongahela River near Lock No. 5. A monition issued and two claims were filed under the Wrongful Death and Survival statutes of Pennsylvania: one by George L. Dearth,
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1959-10-09 · Published · cited 8× · 114 So. 2d 98
114 So.2d 98 (1959) Kirby H. RANDALL et al. v. BATON ROUGE BUS CO., Inc., et al. No. 4847. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. June 30, 1959. Rehearing Denied August 31, 1959. Certiorari Granted October 9, 1959. *99 Taylor, Porter, Brooks, Fuller & Phillips, Frank W. Middleton, Dale,
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912-06-19 · Published · cited 0× · 51 Ind. App. 8; 98 N.E. 889; 1912 Ind. App. LEXIS 82
Ibach, J. — Appellants sued to recover for a loss by fire, on a policy of insurance issued to them by appellee, a mutual insurance company organized and doing business in this State under §4819 Burns 1908, §3774 R. S. 1881. Error is assigned in overruling the separate demurrers of plaintiffs to the second paragraph of defendant’s amended answer, and in sustaining a demurrer to the second and third paragraphs of