Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Branum v. Social Security Administration Commissioner”
*1270 PORFILIO, Circuit Judge. Appellee’s motion to publish the order and judgment of August 5, 2004, is granted. A copy of the published opinion is attached. Plaintiff-appellant Christel Branum appeals from an order of the district court affirming the Social Security Administr
Branum v. Barnhartpublic domain
ORDER AND JUDGMENT ** PORFILIO, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case i
Maddaloni v. Commissioner of Social Securitypublic domain
OPINION SMITH, Circuit Judge. Mark Maddaloni appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, affirming the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security to deny Maddaloni’s application for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The District Court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Appellate jurisdiction
Maddaloni v. Commissioner of Social Securitypublic domain
OPINION SMITH, Circuit Judge. Mark Maddaloni appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, affirming the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security to deny Maddaloni’s application for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The District Court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Appellate jurisdiction
Linda Romano-Murphy v. Commissioner of IRSpublic domain
JORDAN, Circuit Judge: Learned Hand and John Minor Wisdom, two of our most venerated jurists, described the Internal Revenue Code as a labyrinth. See Branum v. Commissioner, 17 F.3d 805, 808 (5th Cir.1994) (Wisdom, *710 J.); Learned Hand, Thomas Walter Swan, 5
Walling v. Berryhillpublic domain
CHARLES B. GOODWIN, United States District Judge *1308Plaintiff Robert John Walling brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("SSA") denying
Wilson v. Berryhillpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S APPEAL Gerald B. Cohn, United States Magistrate Judge This matter is .before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for decision. Plaintiff Jackie Darlene Wilson (“Plaintiff’) seeks judicial review of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s decision finding of not disabled. As set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs appeal and AFFIRMS
Cobb v. Colvinpublic domain
ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Charles D. Cobb’s complaint [Docket No. 1] filed on November 6, 2013. Plaintiff seeks review of the final decision of defendant Carolyn W. Colvin (the “Commissioner”) denying plaintiffs claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-33 and 1
Scott v. Berryhillpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER. GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, CHIEF JUDGE Before the court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on the judicial review of a decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying disability benefits to Annette Scott (“Plaintiff’). [Doc. No. 15].- The Magistrate Judge ■recommends that the Co
Gonzales v. Colvinpublic domain
ORDER R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on review of the Commissioner’s decision denying claimant Rico A. Gonzales’s application for Supplemental Security Income benefits. Jurisdiction is proper under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). For the reasons explained below, the Court reverses and remands the Commissioner’s decision. I. Standard of Review.</
Burke v. Astruepublic domain
ORDER Gary Burke appeals the order of the district court affirming the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) denial of his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. Burke contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) did not properly evaluate his mental impairments because the ALJ did not complete a Psychiatric Review Technique Form (“PRTF”). Burke also argues for remand and reconsideration of the denial o
Burke v. Astruepublic domain
ORDER Gary Burke appeals the order of the district court affirming the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) denial of his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. Burke contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) did not properly evaluate his mental impairments because the ALJ did not complete a Psychiatric Review Technique Form (“PRTF”). Burke also argues for remand and reconsideration of the denial o
Newbold v. Astruepublic domain
EBEL, Circuit Judge. Tyla M. Newbold appeals from a magistrate judge’s order affirming the Commissioner’s decision to grant social security benefits from October 1, 2006, through November 1, 2007, and to deny benefits thereafter. The Commissioner determined Ms. Newbold had been disabled during this closed period 1 due t
Trujillo v. Astruepublic domain
ORDER AND JUDGMENT* JEROME A. HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Ernesto A. Trujillo appeals from a district court order affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s decision to deny his applications for social security disability benefits and supplemental security income payments under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. Exercising our jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
Brock v. Astruepublic domain
*177ORDER AND JUDGMENT** MARY BECK BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Debbie Brock appeals from a district court order affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s decision to deny her applications for social security disability benefits (“SSD”) and supplemental security income payments (“SSI”) under Titles II and
Roybal v. Astruepublic domain
ORDER AND JUDGMENT** STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. Deanna Roybal appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of her application for Social Security disability and Supplemental Security Income payments. We have jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we AFFIRM. I Ms.
Martin v. Barnhartpublic domain
470 F.Supp.2d 1324 (2006) Michael Anthony MARTIN, Plaintiffs, v. Joanne B. BARNHART, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendants. No. 1:04 CV 181 JTG. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. October 13, 2006. *1325 John J. Borsos, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiffs. Amy J. Oliver, U.S. Attorne
Maes v. Astruepublic domain
522 F.3d 1093 (2008) Martha A. MAES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-6317. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. April 14, 2008. *1095 Gayle L. Troutman, Troutman & Troutman, P.C., Tulsa, OK, appearing for Appellant. Eric B. Tu
Lyles v. Barnhartpublic domain
*722ORDER AND JUDGMENT* BOBBY R. BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Stephen Lyles appeals the district court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s denial of his application for social security disability and supplemental security income benefits. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
Wilson v. Astruepublic domain
*1139 BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Polly A. Wilson appeals from an order of the district court affirming the Commissioner’s decision denying her applications for Social Security disability and for Supplemental Security Income benefits (SSI). Ms. Wilson alleged an disability onset date