⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

13 opinions for “Brannan v. Target Corporation of Minnesota”

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003-04-14 · Published · cited 23× · 326 F.3d 383; 50 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 202; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 7050; 41 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 53; 2003 WL 1870898
OPINION OF THE COURT SHADUR, District Judge. Meridian Leasing Corporation (“Meridian”) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware that reversed an order of its Bankruptcy Court by reducing the amount of the rejection damages claim that Meridian had filed against Montgomery Ward Holding Corp and Montgomery Ward <
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0211p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DAYTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; OHIO │ CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; MICHIGAN CHAM
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023-01-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FAIRSTEAD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ) LLC and FCM AFFORDABLE LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0673-JTL ) WILLIAM BLODGETT, )
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017-12-19 · Published · cited 0×
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012-09-28 · Published · cited 47× · 52 A.3d 1251; 617 Pa. 295; 2012 WL 4473297; 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2263
OPINION Chief Justice CASTILLE. The question presented in this case is one of first impression for this Court: whether a medical general practitioner who provides incidental mental health treatment to a patient, with whom he then engages in a sexual affair, may be held to a particularized “specialist duty,” applicable to mental health professionals, that prohibits consensual sexual contact w
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017-12-19 · Published · cited 24× · 173 A.3d 888; 327 Conn. 225
McDONALD, J. This declaratory judgment action concerns whether an insurer is obligated to indemnify a business owner under a personal insurance policy for liability arising from his false imprisonment of his company's employee at her workplace and the evidentiary basis on which such a determination is to be made. In this certified appeal, the defendant Jeffrey S. Pasiak
District Court, N.D. California · 2018-02-07 · Published · cited 54× · 287 F. Supp. 3d 840
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs allege that Defendant General Motors (GM) manufactured and sold a car engine that, due to several internal defects, consumes excessive amounts of oil, resulting in engine damage that presents a safety risk of sudden shutdowns or engine fires. GM moves to dismiss on several grounds which can broadly be grouped under challenges to personal jurisdiction for the out-of-state plaint
District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009-05-14 · Published · cited 7× · 614 F. Supp. 2d 825; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40999; 2009 WL 1353547
614 F.Supp.2d 825 (2009) LGT ENTERPRISES, LLC, d/b/a Letsgotickets and Let's Go Tickets, Plaintiff, v. Judiah Luke HOFFMAN, Defendant. No. 1:08-cv-578. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. May 14, 2009. *828 Craig H. Lubben, Miller Johnson PLC, Kalamazoo, MI, for Plaintiff. Noah E. Yanich, Noah E
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019-09-06 · Published · cited 51× · 938 F.3d 553
Case: 17-20364 Document: 00515108825 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 6, 2019 No. 17-20364
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-04-07 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-15-00028-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/7/2015 4:26:25 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997-06-26 · Published · cited 8× · 968 F. Supp. 1519; 1997 WL 366061
968 F.Supp. 1519 (1997) Robert Wayne O'FERRELL and Mary Ann O'Ferrell, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 92-A-1450-S. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division. June 26, 1997. *1520 *1521 *1522
In Re: Montgomerypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003-04-14 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-14-2003 In Re: Montgomery Precedential or Non-Preceden
District Court, C.D. California · 2004-08-23 · Published · cited 19× · 351 F. Supp. 2d 970; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23887; 2004 WL 3092610
351 F.Supp.2d 970 (2004) In re SYNCOR ERISA LITIGATION This order relates to: All Actions No. CV 03-2446 LGB, No. CV 03-6503, No. CV 04-247. United States District Court, C.D. California. August 23, 2004. *971 *972 *973 Christopher Kim, Assistant: Julie, Lisa J