Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Brandt v. Wyeth”
Wyeth, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabamapublic domain
WOODALL, Justice (dissenting). Wyeth, Inc., and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (hereinafter referred to collectively as ‘Wyeth”), argue that Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama (“BCBSAL”) lacks standing to maintain this action because, according to Wyeth, BCBSAL “has [alleged] no legally cognizable injury.” Wyeth’s brief, at 27-28. I agree. Therefore, at the risk of being accused by the majority of “hav[ing] f
Dobbs v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticalspublic domain
ORDER STEPHEN P. FRIOT, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 289], seeking judgment on Plaintiffs sole remaining claim based on a fraudulent misrepresentation. Plaintiff timely responded, and Defendant filed a reply. I. Background: Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages resulting from
530 F.Supp.2d 1275 (2008) Annabel DOBBS, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Terry Dobbs, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, Defendant. No. CIV-04-1762-D. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. January 17, 2008. *1276 Arnold Anderson Vickery, Paul F. Waldner, III, Vickery & Waldner L
Hoffheins v. Brandtpublic domain
GILES, District Judge. This case presents some interesting questions. They have been argued with that ability which is universally recognized as belonging to the counsel engaged in the cause; and I have tried to do justice to the arguments by a patient review of the authorities to which I was referred, and by a thorough examination of the evidence. The suggestion was made, at the commencement of the hearing, that possibly the ca
J&J Sports Prods., Inc. v. Andpublic domain
LOUIS L. STANTON, U.S.D.J. Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc. ("J & J") moves to dismiss Defendant Zeneyda Patin's counterclaim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and to strike Patin's affirmative defenses as insufficient. The motions are granted. BACKGROUND Plaintiff J & J brings this action p
Harley Blanton v. Domino's Pizza Franchising LLCpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0184p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT HARLEY BLANTON, ┐ Plaintiff, │ │ DEREK PIERS
Curtis v. BP America, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. I. Background This case arises out of the explosion of the DEEPWATER HORIZON in the Gulf of Mexico on April 20, 2010. Stephen Curtis, an assistant driller, died in the explosion. Wyman Wheeler, a toolpusher, suffered severe injuries. Curtis’s estate and family — referred to in this opinion as “Curtis” — and Wheeler sued under the J
National Meat Ass'n v. Brownpublic domain
599 F.3d 1093 (2010) NATIONAL MEAT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, and American Meat Institute, Plaintiff-intervenor, v. Edmund G. BROWN, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Arnold Schwarzenegger, in his official capacity as Governor of California; State of California, Defendants-Appellants, and The Humane Society of the United States; Farm Sanctuary, Inc.; Humane Farming Association; Animal Legal Defense Fund, De
Miller v. STIFEL, NICOLAUS & CO., INC.public domain
812 F.Supp.2d 975 (2011) Leslie Ingram MILLER, Plaintiff, v. STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civ. No. 10-1258 (JJK). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. September 20, 2011. *978 Leslie Ingram Miller, Edina, MN, pro se. Angela Beranek Brandt, Caryn A. Boisen, Larson King, LLP, St. Paul, MN, Josef S.
Zokaites v. Land-Cellular Corp.public domain
424 F.Supp.2d 824 (2006) Frank R. ZOKAITES, Plaintiff, v. LAND-CELLULAR CORPORATION and Robert Moses, Defendants. No. 2:06CV48. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 13, 2006. *825 *826 *827 Jeffrey A. Hulton, Esquire, Brandt, Milnes &
Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Whitepublic domain
627 F.Supp.2d 905 (2009) Jane DOE, 10, a minor, through her mother and next friend, Julie DOE, 10, Julie Doe, 10, Jane Doe, 11, a minor, through her parents and next friends, Jane and John Doe 11, Jane Doe, 11 and John Doe, 11, Plaintiff, v. Jon WHITE, McClean County Unit District No. 5 Board of Directors, Jim Braksick, Alan Chapman, Dale Heidbreder, and John Pye, Defendants. Case No. 08-1287. United S
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-505 (Filed: 7 April 2020) *************************************** NYCAL OFFSHORE DEVELOPMENT * CORPORATION, * * Plaintiff, * Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); * RCFC 12(b)(6); 28 U
25-977; 25-2041 Ass’n of Contracting Plumbers v. City of New York; Mulhern Gas Co., Inc. v. Mosley In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2025 Argued: January 30, 2026 Decided: June 30, 2026
25-977; 25-2041 Ass’n of Contracting Plumbers v. City of New York; Mulhern Gas Co., Inc. v. Mosley In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2025 Argued: January 30, 2026 Decided: June 30, 2026
State Ex Rel. Proctor v. Messinapublic domain
320 S.W.3d 145 (2010) STATE ex rel. Bobbie Jean PROCTOR and Vincent Proctor, Relators, v. The Honorable Edith L. MESSINA, Circuit Judge, Sixteenth Judicial Circuit, Jackson County, Missouri, Respondent. No. SC 90610. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. August 31, 2010. *146 Hans H. van Zanten and Michael T. Yonke, Yonke & Pot
John Ross v. Karen A. Lowitz (074200)public domain
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) John Ross v. Karen Lowitz (074200) (A-101-13) Argued March 17, 2015 -- Decided August 6, 2015 P
Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc.public domain
CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge: Appellants Heath Knight and Thomas Ingerman appeal the district court’s summary judgment ruling for appellees Kirby Inland Marine and related companies. For the following reasons, we affirm. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Heath Knight began working for Kirby Inland Marine (“Kirby”) in 1993. Kni
Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc.public domain
482 F.3d 347 Heath KNIGHT; et al., Plaintiffs,Heath Knight; Thomas David Ingerman, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.KIRBY INLAND MARINE INC.; Kirby Inland Marine Inc. of Texas, also known as Dixie Marine Inc.; Hollywood Marine Inc.; Kirby Inland Marine Inc. of Mississippi, Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-60134. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 19, 2007.</
Henry v. Dinellepublic domain
DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY, District Judge. Currently before the Court, in this prisoner civil rights action filed by Jonathan Henry (“Plaintiff’) against the three above-captioned employees of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“Defendants”), is Plaintiffs motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 50(b), or for a new
Durham Ex Rel. Durham v. County of Mauipublic domain
696 F.Supp.2d 1150 (2010) Sheri Gail DURHAM, Individually and as next of Friend of Marisa Uma Lama Durham, Minor et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF MAUI, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 08-00342 JMS/LEK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. February 12, 2010. Kenneth B. Chaiken, Robert L. Chaiken, Chaiken & Chaiken, PC, Lee Brown, Eric Porterfield, Lee Brown, Th