Cases

2017 WI 103 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2017AP539-D COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Ronald L. Brandt, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Ronald L. Brandt,

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SHARIDA TOLLIVER, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N23C-03-072 SSA ) CALVIN L. MUSSER III and ) JOANNE N. MUSSER, ) Defendants. ) Submitted: January 7, 2026 Decid

MEMORANDUM *** Wendy J. Howell sought judicial review of the Commissioner’s final decision denying her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-33.1 The District Court for the Eastern District of Washington granted the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, and Howell appeals.2

ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING SMEAD’S OBJECTIONS (Doc. # 12) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. #11) IN ITS ENTIRETY; AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER’S FINAL NON-DISABILITY DETERMINATION AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. Mark Smead (“Smead”) brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial re

2017 WI 105 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP1928-D COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Robert W. Horsch, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Robert W. Horsch,

Keywords: Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Pro Se Complaint; Tax Refund; Administrative Refund Request; Informal Claim Doctrine; I.R.C. § 6511; I.R.C. § 6532; Statute of Limitations. OPINION AND ORDER KAPLAN, Judge. In this tax refund case, pro se Plaintiff Erica Fremuth, a non-resident alien, claims that she is entitled to a refund

2017 WI 4 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP2676-D COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Ty Christopher Willihnganz, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant-Respondent, v.

350 B.R. 465 (2006) In re COMMERCIAL MONEY CENTER, INC. Debtor. NetBank, FSB, Appellant, v. Richard M. Kipperman, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee. BAP No. SC-05-1238-MoTB, Bankruptcy No. 02-9721-H7, Adversary No. 03-90331-H7. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Argued on March 23, 2006. Submitted on May 4, 2006. Filed

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-404 C Filed: March 14, 2023 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * TRACE SYSTEMS INC., * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES,

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-404 C Filed: March 15, 2023* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * TRACE SYSTEMS INC., * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TOM S. LEE, District Judge. This cause is before the court on the motion of defendant Daniel G. Skrip to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Robert (Rob) Lucas Thomas, individually and as next friend and natural guardian of minors R.L.T., H.H.T., C.S.T., A.C.T. and S.H.T., has respond

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-2340 C Filed Under Seal: June 21, 2022 Reissued: June 29, 2022 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * ACI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., * * Plaintiff, *

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0151p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ KAYLA GORE; L.G.; K.N.; JAIME COMBS, │

230 B.R. 392 (1999) In re Paul Alan LEIBOWITZ, Debtor. Paul Alan Leibowitz, Appellant, v. County of Orange, and Michael R. Capizzi, District Attorney, Appellees. BAP No. CC-98-1045-JBRi, Bankruptcy No. ND 96-14014 RR, Adversary No. ND 97-1089 RR. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Submitted September 18, 1998. Decided February 22

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-219C (Filed: April 22, 2019) *Opinion originally filed under seal on April 4, 2019 ) VERTEX AEROSPACE, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Bid Protest; Post-award; Judgment on ) the

2015 WI 96 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP2742-D COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Thomas O. Mulligan, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant-Respondent, v. Thomas O. Mulligan,

2015 WI 96 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP2742-D COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Thomas O. Mulligan, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant-Respondent, v. Thomas O. Mulligan,

OPINION OF THE COURT Shirley Werner Kornreich, J. This action arises from an insurance and indemnity agreement (the I&I) between plaintiff Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.1 (Assured) and various other parties to a securitization transaction of residential mortgage loans. These parties were: defendants DB Structured Products, Inc. (DBSP) and ACE Securities Corp. (ACE); third-p

Post-Award Bid Protest; Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; Standing; Cross-Motions for Judgment on the Administrative Record; Technical Evaluations OPINION AND ORDER PATRICIA E. CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge This is a post-award bid protest related to a contract to provide Information Technology (IT)

Post-award Bid Protest; Best-Value Negotiated Procurement conducted under FAR Part 15; FAR 15.305; FAR 15.308 Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); Standing; Tradeoff. OPINION AND ORDER KAPLAN, Judge. This is a post-award bid protest arising out of the United States Air Force’s Request for Proposals No. FA8125-13-R-0003 for a