Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Brandon Scott Rader”
People v. Brandonpublic domain
197 Ill. App.3d 866 (1990) 557 N.E.2d 1264 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN BRANDON et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 1-86-2220, 1-86-2224 cons. Illinois Appellate Court First District (1st Division). Opinion filed April 23, 1990. Rehearing denied June 21, 1990.
Ellison v. Dana Corporationpublic domain
*********** The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Homick and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties or their representatives. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Homick,
David Manor v. Brett Woodroofpublic domain
02/12/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 12, 2020 Session DAVID MANOR v. BRETT WOODROOF Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 18X869 Phillip R. Robinson, Judge ___________________________________
In Re Bilskipublic domain
RADER, Circuit Judge, dissenting. This court labors for page after page, paragraph after paragraph, explanation after explanation to say what could have been said in a single sentence: “Because Bilski claims merely an abstract idea, this court affirms the Board’s rejection.” If the only problem of this vast judicial tome were its circuitous path, I would not dissent, but this venture also disrupts settled and
TiVo Inc. v. EchoStar Corp.public domain
646 F.3d 869 (2011) TIVO INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ECHOSTAR CORPORATION, EchoStar DBS Corporation, EchoStar Technologies Corporation, EchoSphere Limited Liability Company, EchoStar Satellite LLC, and Dish Network Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. No. 2009-1374. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. April 20, 2011. *873</
Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Crosspublic domain
415 F.3d 130375 U.S.P.Q.2d 1321 Edward H. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AWH CORPORATION, Hopeman Brothers, INC., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Cross Appellants. 03-1269, -1286 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT July 12, 2005, DecidedAs Amended July 14, 2005.Cert. denied by AWH Corp. v. Phillips, (Feb. 21, 2006)Appealed from Philli
State v. Raderpublic domain
FARIS, J. From a conviction-in the circuit court of Boone county of the crime of grand larceny and a sentence therefor to imprisonment in the penitentiary *123for a term of two years, defendant, pursuant to the usual procedure, has appealed. The facts presented by this record and upon which this conviction is sought to be sustained, are unique. The defe
03/30/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 1, 2020 Session THE NORTHSHORE CORRIDOR ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. KNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEE, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No.
03/30/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 1, 2020 Session THE NORTHSHORE CORRIDOR ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. KNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEE, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No.
State v. Tamalinipublic domain
Alexander, J. The issue we are confronted with here is whether the offenses of manslaughter in the first or second degree are lesser included offenses or inferior degrees of *727second degree felony murder. We conclude that they are not and, consequently, affirm the Court of Appeals. The charge against Reno Tamalini that led to this appeal arose out of
United States v. Warnagirispublic domain
Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca
State of Tennessee v. Cory Lee Jacksonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 16, 2013 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CORY LEE JACKSON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2011-A-637 Mark J. Fishburn, Judge No. M2012-00943-CCA-R3-CD - Filed November 26, 2013 The Defendant-Appellant, Cory Lee Jackson, was indicted by a Davidson County Grand Jury fo
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District G. STEVEN COX, ) ) Appellant, ) WD76616 ) v. ) OPINION FILED: August 5, 2014 ) KANSAS CITY CHIEFS FOOTBALL
Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.public domain
(2008) THERASENSE, INC., Plaintiff, v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, Defendant. and Consolidated Cases. Nos. C 04-02123 WHA, C 04-03327 WHA, C 04-03732 WHA, C 05-03117 WHA. United States District Court, N.D. California. June 24, 2008. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Aft
Little v. Statepublic domain
85 Wis.2d 558 (1978) 271 N.W.2d 105 LITTLE, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error. No. 77-139-CR. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs September 7, 1978. Decided October 31, 1978. For the plaintiff in error the cause was submitted on the brief of Howard B. Eisenberg, state public defender, and
State of Tennessee v. Clifford Coleman, Sr.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 18, 2001 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CLIFFORD COLEMAN, SR. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Giles County No. 7367 Robert L. Jones, Judge No. M2000-01916-CCA-R3-CD - Filed January 31, 2002 The defendant, Clifford Coleman, Sr., was co
Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.public domain
ORDER A petition for rehearing was filed by the plaintiff-appellant, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by the defendants-appellees. The United States Patent and Trademark Office and Fish & Richardson P.C. filed briefs as amici curiae. This matter was referred first to the merits panel that heard this appeal, which vacated its earlier decision and prepared a revised decision for issuance. Thereaft
State v. Tamalinipublic domain
953 P.2d 450 (1998) 134 Wash.2d 725 STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Reno TAMALINI, Petitioner. No. 64303-2. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued October 24, 1996. Decided March 26, 1998. *451 Anna-Mari Sarkanen, Seattle, Amicus Curiae for Washington Association of Criminal Defe
In Re Derderianpublic domain
DECISION The issue before the Court relates to the criminal case ofState v. Michael Derderian, case number K1-03-0655A. On February 20, 2003, the Defendant's nightclub, The Station, burned to the ground, killing 100 people. The Defendant was charged with 100 counts of involuntary manslaughter under the criminal negligence theory and 100 counts of involuntary manslaughter under the misdemeanor manslaughter theory.<
Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Incorporatedpublic domain
323 F.3d 956 ENZO BIOCHEM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED, andChugai Pharma U.S.A., Inc. and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., andBiomerieux, Inc., andBecton Dickinson and Company, Defendants-Appellees, andBiomerieux SA, Defendant. No. 01-1230. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: July 15, 2002.