⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Brandon Louis Turner”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023-10-11 · Published · cited 30× · 83 F.4th 1099
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2600 ___________________________ Mark Edward Nieters Plaintiff - Appellant v. Brandon Holtan; Dana Wingert; City of Des Moines, Iowa
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2023-06-21 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Opinion Filed June 21, 2023 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00964-CR BRANDON EDDARIUS WHITE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
State v. Turnerpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011-12-14 · Published · cited 3× · 82 So. 3d 449; 2011 La. App. LEXIS 1548; 2011 WL 6183523
82 So.3d 449 (2011) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee v. Neyland Trivel TURNER, Jr., Appellant. No. 46,683-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. December 14, 2011. Rehearing Denied January 19, 2012. *451 Louis Granderson Scott, for Appellant. Neyland Trivel Turner, Jr., Pro Se. Jerry L. Jones
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2010-06-09 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 07-09-00114-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Berisha v. Lawsonpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 4× · 378 F. Supp. 3d 1145
MARCIA G. COOKE, United States District Judge THIS MATTER is before me on the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 138 ) filed by Defendants Guy Lawson, Alexander Podrizki, David Packouz, Simon & Schuster, Inc. ("S & S") and Recorded *1149Books, Inc. Defendants' motion is fully briefed and ripe for review. For the reasons set forth h
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2001-10-11 · Published · cited 37× · 809 So. 2d 611; 2001 WL 1198984
809 So.2d 611 (2001) BRANDON HMA, INC. d/b/a Rankin Medical Center v. Dawn BRADSHAW. No. 2000-CA-00735-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. October 11, 2001. Rehearing Denied January 10, 2002. *613 Whitman B. Johnson, III, Jackson, Charles Gregory Copeland, Ridgeland, Shelly G. Burns, Jackson, Janet G. Arnold, Ridg
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2000-01-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2000-CA-00735-SCT BRANDON HMA, INC. d/b/a RANKIN MEDICAL CENTER v. DAWN BRADSHAW DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/31/2000 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHN T. KITCHENS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: RANKIN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: WHITMAN B. JOHNSON, III
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986-09-28 · Published · cited 0× · 662 F. Supp. 362; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19812
MEMORANDUM/ORDER LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge. On May 2,1986, defendant Asbestos Corporation Limited (ACL) moved to dismiss for lack of in personam jurisdiction. The memorandum in support of the motion is an all-but-verbatim duplication of the memorandum ACL filed in support of its motion to dismiss for lack of in personam jurisdiction in Paravati v. Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd., C.
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2000-01-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2000-CA-00364-SCT WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. TURNER FRIERSON, JR. AND PINKIE MAE FRIERSON DATE OF JUDGMENT: 1/18/2000 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. GRAY EVANS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: SUNFLOWER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: LAWRENCE D. WADE
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016-03-10 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 2, 2016 Session BRYAN MCNEESE v. WENDOLYN CAROL WILLIAMS, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sumner County No. 2014-CV-30 Louis W. Oliver, III, Chancellor No. M2015-01037-COA-R3-CV – Filed March 10, 2016 This appeal involves a Rule 60 motion to set aside an ag
District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2005-11-10 · Published · cited 54× · 231 F.R.D. 632; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28440; 2005 WL 3019755
ORDER STEELE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (doc. 119). *637The Motion has been exhaustively litigated, as the parties have submitted more than 200 pages of briefs and over 800 exhibits in support of their respective positions. The parties also presented live testimony and argument in
Banks v. Slaypublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013-10-08 · Published · cited 2× · 410 S.W.3d 767; 2013 WL 5530610; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1168
PER CURIAM. Michael J. Banks and Antonia Rush-Banks (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the judgment of the circuit court denying their petition for writ of mandamus against Francis G. Slay, Darlene Green, Larry C. Williams, and Bettye Battle Turner (“Defendants”). The petition for writ is denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed a petition against police officers Reginald Williams and Ryan Cousins as well a
Banks v. Slaypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-11-17 · Published · cited 44× · 875 F.3d 876
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. • A core tenet of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 jurisprudence is that an official-capacity suit against an individual is really a suit against that official’s government entity. This case -applies that principle,- as the primary issue we are called upon to decide is whether—under the facts of this case—a properly served, yet unnamed, government entity may evade a judgment o
Williams v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014-07-25 · Published · cited 17× · 98 A.3d 917; 2014 WL 3702418; 2014 Del. LEXIS 344
RIDGELY, Justice: Defendant-Below/Appellant Brandon Williams appeals from a judgment of convictions in the Superior Court of Burglary Second Degree, Unlawful Use of a Credit Card, Misdemeanor Theft, and Resisting Arrest. The State alleged that Williams entered the home of Jeffrey Fisher through an open window and stole his wallet from his home office. Police officers were alerted
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1910-03-03 · Published · cited 3× · 126 S.W. 703; 59 Tex. Civ. App. 451; 1910 Tex. App. LEXIS 400
On a former appeal of this case a judgment in favor of the railway company was reversed because the trial court had erred in peremptorily instructing the jury to return the verdict on which it was based (113 S.W. 968). This appeal is from a judgment against the railway company for the sum of $1,500. Among other allegations, appellee's petition contained the following: "3. That on about the said 5th day of August, 1906, plaintiff was in the empl
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-09-15 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRANDON STRONG, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25 - 1011 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORP., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Brandon Strong was employed as a cons
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2025-02-14 · Published · cited 0×
In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 21–1425 Submitted November 13, 2024—Filed February 14, 2025 State of Iowa, Appellee, vs. Gerry Harland Greenland, Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-03-29 · Published · cited 2× · 173 F. Supp. 3d 44; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41498; 2016 WL 1271070
OPINION & ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge. Petitioner Gigi Jordan brings this Petition to enforce her rights under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (“CVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, alleging that she is a victim of federal crimes perpetrated by her former husband. Respondents the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), the United States Department of Health an
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016-06-24 · Published · cited 2× · 882 N.W.2d 1; 2016 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 78
WIGGINS, Justice (dissenting). There is no majority opinion in our resolution of this case today, and therefore *33there remains no decision from this court holding the right to counsel under article I, section 10 of the Iowa Constitution attaches only upon the filing of a criminal complaint.22 Because the plurality and concurr