Cases

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: After eight voting citizens of Greensboro, North Carolina, ("Citizens") prevailed in an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Guilford County Board of Elections, successfully challenging as unconstitutional a 2015 state law that redrew Greensboro City Council d

ANDERSON, Justice (dissenting). At issue here is whether Dr. Richard Dinter owed Nurse Practitioner Sherry Simon's patient Susan Warren a duty of care. Because it was not reasonably foreseeable that Warren, who never met or talked to Dinter, would rely on Dinter's decision, reached in a single phone call between Dinter and Warren's actual treating professional, Simon, there is no legal duty here. I therefore respectfully dissent.</

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-KA-00742-SCT BRANDON J. BARNETT a/k/a BRANDON JAY BARNETT a/k/a BRICK v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/19/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DAL WILLIAMSON TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: MATTHEW CHISOLM SHERMAN J. RONALD PARRISH DENNIS LEE BISN

AP77,034 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 1/15/2015 11:00:45 PM January 16, 2015 No. 77,034 Accepted 1/16/2015 9:10:03 AM

309 Ga. 473 FINAL COPY S20A0688. CLARK v. THE STATE. WARREN, Justice. Rodney Carter Clark was convicted of malice murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of Mario Johnson.1 On appeal, Clark contends only that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions. We disagree and affirm. 1 The crimes were committed in the early morning hours of November 15, 2015. A Newton County grand jury first returned an indictment in thi

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-17-00221-CR ASPEN WARREN APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

Case: 24-60509 Document: 62-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/20/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED November 20, 2025

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 12, 2014 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BRANDON CROASMUN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cannon County Nos. F12-58, F12-94 David M. Bragg, Judge No. M2014-00243-CCA-R3-CD - Filed November 7, 2014 The defendant, Brandon Croasmun, appeals from the Cannon County Circuit Court’s denial of

JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judge: *1141 Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC ("Transcontinental") brought these consolidated condemnation proceedings against several property owners in Northwest Georgia (collectively, "Defendants") in order to obtain an easement for the construction o

398 F.Supp.2d 850 (2005) Dedrick Lamar THOMAS, Petitioner, v. Millicent WARREN, Respondent. No. CIV. 04-CV-40196-FL. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. November 2, 2005. *851 *852 *853 *854 D

691 F.Supp.2d 1255 (2010) Kirk WARREN, Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts insurance company, Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-cv-01891-PAB-MEH. United States District Court, D. Colorado. February 19, 2010. *1257 Frances Renae Johnson, The Carey Law Firm, Colorado Springs, CO, for Plaintiff.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 12, 2016 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER LYNN CLARK Appeal from the Circuit Court for Obion County No. CC-2014-CR-09 Jeffrey W. Parham, Judge ___________________________________ No. W2015-01579-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 15, 2016 _________________

Supreme Court of Louisiana FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #077 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinion handed down on the 19th day of December, 2016, is as follows: BY HUGHES, J.: 2012-KA-0508 STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JEFFREY CLARK (Parish of West Feliciana) For the reasons assigned herein, the defendant’s conviction and death sentence are affirmed. In the

739 F.Supp.2d 1168 (2010) Derrick CLARK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. State of CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. Case No. C 96-1486 CRB. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 16, 2010. *1172 Shawn Hanson, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Caroline Nason Mitchell, Jones Day, Douglas Edward Roberts, San Francisco,

OPINION DEBEVOISE, Senior District Judge. This case concerns allegations of deception and bad faith against a health insurance company, The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”). Plaintiffs Beverly Clark, Jesse J. Paul, Warren Gold, Linda M. Cusanelli, Carole L. Walcher, and Terri L. Drogell (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have filed a putative class action complaint against Prudenti

672 A.2d 608 (1996) 341 Md. 621 Linda C. MOLESWORTH v. Randall BRANDON et al. No. 83, Sept. Term, 1995. Court of Appeals of Maryland. March 5, 1996. *609 Alan Hilliard Legum (Alan Hilliard Legum, P.A., on brief), Annapolis, for petitioner. E. Alexander Adams (Betty Smith Adams, Adams & Adams, on

Fletcher, Presiding Justice. In these two child custody disputes, the maternal grandparents challenge the trial court’s award of custody to the noncustodial father. The trial courts found in both cases that it would be in the best interest of each child to remain with his grandparents, but struck down the “best-interest-of-the-child” standard in OCGA § 19-7-1 (b.l) as unconstitutional. We granted the grandparents’ discretion

783 So.2d 735 (2000) Leigh Ann WARREN, Appellant, v. SANDOZ PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Appellee. No. 98-CA-00088-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. August 22, 2000. Rehearing Denied February 6, 2001. Certiorari Denied May 3, 2001. *737 Mark C. Baker, Brandon, John W. Christopher, Ridgeland,

753 F.Supp. 491 (1990) Jo-Ann Fox WEINGARTEN and Susan Fox Rosellini, Plaintiffs, v. William C. WARREN, individually and as executor of the Estate of Belle Fox, Defendant. No. 90 Civ. 4338 (MBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 19, 1990. *492 Robert J. Hausen, Stanley S. Arkin, Marc Ullman, Chadbourne &

ROTHENBERG, J. Pedro Goicochea (“Goicochea”) seeks certiorari review of the trial court’s non-final order that “sustained” Meena Lopez’s (“Plaintiff’) motion for a protective order and limited Goicochea and the other co-defendants to a single independent medical examination (“IME”) “per [medical] specialty.” We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order under review. The Plaintiff sued