Cases

79 F.Supp.2d 1364 (1999) MAXWELL CHASE TECHNOLOGIES, L.L.C., a Georgia limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. KMB PRODUCE, INC., a Texas corporation, Eico Designs, Inc., an Alabama corporation, and Craig Sanders, an individual, Defendants, v. Maxwell Chase Technologies, L.L.C., a Georgia limited liability company, and William M. Brander, an individual, Counterclaim and Third Party Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:99-

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Aeritas, LLC (“Aeritas”) filed a complaint on October 13, 2011, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,933,589 (“the '589 patent”) and 7,209,903 (“the '903 patent”) by Alaska Air Group, Inc. (“AAG”). (D.I. 1) On December 9, 2011, in lieu of an answer, AAG moved to dismiss the complaint. (D.I. 8) In response,

36 F.Supp.2d 171 (1999) John R. MICKOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. VISI-TRAK CORPORATION, John R. Vann, Jack Branden, and Ying Shen Defendants. No. 94 Civ. 6088(JES). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 3, 1999. *172 *173 Kaplan & Gilman, L.L.P., Woodbridge, NJ (Jeffrey I. Kaplan,

WINTERSHEIMER, Justice. This appeal is from a decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed a judgment of the circuit court determining that the estate of a deceased father with support obligations was entitled to a credit on social security benefits paid for child support as a result of his death. The issue is whether the trial court erred in crediting social security payments against child support and

263 P.3d 463 (2011) 2011 UT App 281 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Jason Lyle BUTLER, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20090914-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. August 25, 2011. *464 Randall W. Richards and Brittany R. Brown, Ogden, for Appellant. Mark L. Shurtleff and Kris C. Leonard, Salt Lake

OPINION BY DUBOW, J.: The Commonwealth appeals from the Order entered in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas granting Appellee, Alphonso Griffin, a new trial. After careful review, we conclude that the trial court improperly granted Appellee’s Post-Sentence Motion for a New Trial based on after-discovered evidence. ' Accordingly, we reverse the tr

Matter of Lily BB. (Stephen BB.) (2021 NY Slip Op 01106) Matter of Lily BB. (Stephen BB.) 2021 NY Slip Op 01106 Decided on February 18, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting

MURPHY, Circuit Judge, concurring. I concur with the panel’s conclusion that the process provided to BCI did not meet the minimum requirements of due process and that therefore DOE’s order should be vacated. Nevertheless, I write separately to note that the interest of the government in a case such as this is substantial and that the DOE likely would have had the ability to conduct a hearing that complied wi

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 565 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 566 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAY

SELYA, Circuit Judge. The district court, presiding over a complex multi-count, multi-defendant capital case, issued a pretrial order calling for the empanelment of two separate juries: one to determine guilt and the other, totally different in composition, to determine whether to impose the death penalty. Before us, the government asserts that the Federal Death Penalty Act (FDPA)

Matter of Rosalynne AA. (Bridget AA.) (2023 NY Slip Op 04242) Matter of Rosalynne AA. (Bridget AA.) 2023 NY Slip Op 04242 Decided on August 10, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursu

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Defendant Theodore McDowell of one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 1,000 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(A)(vii). Prior to trial, Defendant unsuccessfully sought to suppress evidence seized in the house where he was arrested. He now appeals the denial of his motio

[Cite as R.M. v. D.M., 2023-Ohio-3978.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA R.M., : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 112493 v. : D.M., : Defe

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER NEESE, District Judge. A magistrate of this district recommended that the motion of the third-party defendant Olympic Fibers, S. A. (Olympic), for a dismissal of the third-party claim against it herein for lack of this Court’s jurisdiction of its person, Rule 12(b)(2), Fed*22eral Rules of Civil Procedure, and for a dismissa

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 121,467 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. AARON DAVID CASH, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An appellate court generally reviews the factual findings underlyin

SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. OPINION CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR *372 This case concerns whether a common law basis for the forfeiture of derivative contraband exists in Pennsylvania.

02/26/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 15, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JEFFERY DEWAYNE STRONG Appeal from the Criminal Court for Macon County No. 56CC1-2016-CR-110 Brody N. Kane, Judge ___________________________________

372 F.Supp.2d 168 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, v. Darryl GREEN, Jonathan Hart, Edward Washington, Branden Morris, and Torrance Green, Defendants. Crim.No. 02-10301-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 2, 2005. *169 William C. Brennan, Jr., Brennan, Trainor, Billman & Bennett, LLP, Upper Marlboro, MD, R

499 F.Supp.2d 300 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, v. Neil KRAMER, Isadore A. Userowitz a/k/a "Arthur Userowitz," Harold Weisberg, Hamad Ali a/k/a "Ahmed Jeran," Hamood Zokari, Nageeb Aldaylam, Mohammed Algahim a/k/a "Mohamed Kaid," Abdullah Alhababi, Salem Al-Merdai, Abdo Alwasia, Mohsen Hudyih and Fateh Nagi Saleh, Defendants. No. 1:06-cr-200-ENV-CLP. United States District Court, E.D. New York.<

ALP Sys., Inc. v. Haygood, 2021 NCBC 9. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION BUNCOMBE COUNTY 20 CVS 1380 ALP SYSTEMS, INC.; and STACY BEAN, Plaintiffs, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON DEFENDANT BOLTED LIGHTNING DALE RICHARD HAYGOOD;