Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
10 opinions for “Brailsford v. Roach”
Gunnels v. Roachpublic domain
243 S.C. 248 (1963) 133 S.E.2d 757 Stephen GUNNELS, by his Guardian ad Litem and natural mother, Hazel Gunnels, Respondent, v. Studard ROACH, Appellant. 18128 Supreme Court of South Carolina. December 3, 1963. *249 Messrs. Watkins, Vandiver, Freeman & Kirven, of Anderson, for Appellant.</
State v. Ochoapublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 47796 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Filed: November 9, 2020 Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) Melanie Gagnepain, Clerk v. ) ) ALEJANDRA MARIA OCHOA,
Valerie West v. Statepublic domain
FIRST DIVISION BROWN, C. J., BARNES, P. J., and WATKINS, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules December 12,
Truesdale v. South Carolina Highway Departmentpublic domain
Bussey, Justice: This wrongful death action was brought by respondents as the personal representatives of Kimberly Ann Truesdale against one Sara Lynn Young and against the South Carolina Highway Department, the appellant herein, the action against the Highway Department being controlled by the “South Carolina Governmental Motor Vehicle Tort Claims Act” [1968 (55) 3027] codified as sections 10-2621 through 10-2625 in the 1973
Andre v. Morrowpublic domain
DONALDSON, Chief Justice. Plaintiff-Respondent (André) brought an action in California against defendants-appellants (Morrows) contending that the Morrows had committed a fraud on André’s conservatee, Beatrice Morrow. André requested the California court to impose a constructive trust on certain real property located in Idaho, in which the Morrows held legal title and which they had allegedly acquired with the proceeds of th
Watson v. Aikenpublic domain
243 S.C. 368 (1963) 133 S.E.2d 833 J.B. WATSON, Administrator of the Estate of Jimmy Gantt Watson, Respondent, v. Harold L. AIKEN, and one 1954 Pontiac Tudor Automobile, 1961 S.C. License No. E-176812, Appellant. 18144 Supreme Court of South Carolina. December 17, 1963. Messrs. Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, of Greenville, fo
Herring v. Boydpublic domain
245 S.C. 284 (1965) 140 S.E.2d 246 James O. HERRING, as Administrator of the Estate of Dale Olen Herring, Respondent, v. Geneva BOYD, Appellant. 18299 Supreme Court of South Carolina. February 4, 1965. *285 *286 Messrs. Henderson, Salley & Cushman, of Aiken,
Elliott v. McNairpublic domain
250 S.C. 75 (1967) 156 S.E.2d 421 Jack R. ELLIOTT, Appellant, v. Robert E. McNAIR, Governor of the State of South Carolina, Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Grady L. Patterson, Jr., Treasurer of the State of South Carolina, John H. Mills, Comptroller General of the State of South Carolina, Edgar A. Brown, Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Robert J. Aycock, Chairman of the Ways and
Ruggles v. Padgettpublic domain
240 S.C. 494 (1962) 126 S.E.2d 553 W. E. RUGGLES and Joseph B. Gilchrist, individually and as Representatives of Other Taxpayers and Homeowners in Hanahan Public Service District, Appellants, v. Bennie PADGETT, V.B. Staton, E.E. Mosley, J.D. Kelley and Frank Sineri, individually and as the Hanahan Public Service District, a body politic and corporate; Randell C. Stoney, C. Fletcher Carter, Jr., J. Palmer Gaillard, Jr., Wil
Wolf v. Union Trust Co.public domain
The Baltimore and Eastern Shore Ferry Line, Inc., as maker, with Harry B. Wolf and Charles L. Wolf as the endorsers, gave, for value, to the Union Trust Company of Maryland, its promissory note for the sum of fifteen thousand dollars, payable at the office of the company four months after date. As the note fell due on Saturday, the statute provided that it should be presented for payment on the next succeeding business day, which was Monday, March 12th, 1923, and on that day the note was duly