⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Bradley T. McClellan”

State v. McClellanpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-12-30 · Published · cited 2× · 2022 Ohio 4791
[Cite as State v. McClellan, 2022-Ohio-4791.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 30007 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE CRAIG McCLELLAN
State v. McClellanpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023-06-28 · Published · cited 2× · 2023 Ohio 2152
[Cite as State v. McClellan, 2023-Ohio-2152.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 30304 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE KEVIN MCCLELLAN
State v. McClellanpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-01-31 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 Ohio 398
[Cite as State v. McClellan, 2018-Ohio-398.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. : H
State v. McClellanpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010-02-01 · Published · cited 24× · 2010 Ohio 314
[Cite as State v. McClellan, 2010-Ohio-314.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 1-09-21 v. JAMES L. MCCLELLAN, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Allen County Common Pleas Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011-12-29 · Published · cited 6× · 671 F.3d 881
OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals arise from claims that major telecommunications carriers assisted the government with intelligence gathering following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. News reports that the National Security Agency (“NSA”) undertook a warrantless eavesdropping program with alleged cooperation by telecommunications companies spawned dozens of lawsuits
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2019-08-29 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-714V (to be published) ************************* * L.M., a minor by and through her parent * and guardian, CHAD MCCLELLAN, * * Special Master Corcoran
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2012-06-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 27, 2011 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DANIEL ROSS McCLELLAN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hawkins County No. 07CR0247 John F. Dugger, Judge No. E2010-02338-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 21, 2012 A Hawkins County jury convicted the Defendant-Appellant, Daniel Ross McClellan, of rape of a child
State v. McClellanpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994-01-12 · Published · cited 5× · 638 N.E.2d 593; 93 Ohio App. 3d 315; 1994 Ohio App. LEXIS 31
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 317 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 318 On May 30, 1991, the Hamilton County Grand Jury returned an indictment against defendant-appellant Huey McClellan, charging him with
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994-10-14 · Published · cited 160× · 37 F.3d 1240; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 28483; 1994 WL 559525
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Abdi Sheik-Abdi filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against three Macomb, Illinois, police officers and a McDonough District Hospital paramedic alleging that they unlawfully arrested and confined him in violation of his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The district court denied Sheik-Abdi’s cross-motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgme
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993-03-17 · Published · cited 0× · 859 S.W.2d 333; 1993 Tenn. App. LEXIS 203
OPINION LEWIS, Judge. This is an appeal by plaintiff/appellant, Carolyn Bradley, from the judgment of the trial court entered on the jury’s verdict in favor of the defendants/appellees and the dismissal of her suit. The pertinent facts are as follows: Plaintiff filed this suit after she was injured under circumstances which she alleged were caused by the ne
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2003-12-04 · Published · cited 32× · 124 S.W.3d 813; 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 10153; 2003 WL 22860956
Case Number: 03-03-00176-CV 08/26/2004 Case stored in record room 08/11/2004 Notice sent to Court of Appeals 06/18/2004 Petition for Review disposed proceeding denied 06/04/2004 Reply filed 05/20/2004 Response to Petition for Review filed 04/20/2004 Motion for Extension of Time disposed. Granted 04/19/2004 Designation of Lead Counsel 04/19/2004 M/E/T to file response 03/22/2004 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply 03/16/2004 Case forwarded to Court 03/08/2004
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006-03-29 · Published · cited 51× · 442 F.3d 524; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 7639; 2006 WL 783489
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge, dissenting. When Officers Joseph E. Doyle, Eric Sporman, and Ken Souser (“officers”) entered both the backyard and home of Choice L. Causey and Henretta Bradley (“plaintiffs”) without a warrant, it was clearly established that there were no exigent circumstances to justify the warrant-less entry.1 Because I would thus affirm the district court’s o
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2004-08-12 · Published · cited 227× · 143 S.W.3d 416; 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 7164; 2004 WL 1792008
143 S.W.3d 416 (2004) Robert S. HOWELL, D.C.; First Rio Valley Medical, P.A.; Keith Gilbert; William Maxwell; and Gilbert & Maxwell, P.L.L.C., Appellants, v. TEXAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION; Envoy Medical Systems, L.L.C.; Texas Mutual Insurance Company; State Office of Risk Management; and Continental Casualty Insurance Company, Appellees. No. 03-03-00381-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austi
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00026-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/12/2025 12:11 AM
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2010-10-20 · Published · cited 3× · 323 S.W.3d 626; 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 8387; 2010 WL 4111503
323 S.W.3d 626 (2010) AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Susan POEHLER, Appellee. No. 12-09-00293-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler. October 20, 2010. *628 Greg D. Solcher, Robert D. Stokes, for Appellant. Bradley D. McClellan, Frank D. Weedon, for Appellee. Panel consisted of WORTHEN, C.J., GRIFFITH,
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2009-10-08 · Published · cited 0× · 298 S.W.3d 791; 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 7823; 2009 WL 3219464
298 S.W.3d 791 (2009) FACILITY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Kevin Loyd GIBBS, Appellee. No. 11-09-00005-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. October 8, 2009. John R. Walker, Joy M. Brennan, Smith & Carr, P.C., Houston, for appellant. Bradley Dean McClellan, Austin, for appellee. Panel consists of WRIGHT, C.J., McCALL, J., and STRANGE, J
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-11-04 · Published · cited 9× · 480 S.W.3d 667; 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 11345; 2015 WL 6956758
OPINION Opinion on Motion FOR Rehearing Opinion by: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice On September 16, 2015, American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania filed a motion for rehearing. We deny the motion for rehearing; however, we withdraw our opinion and-judgment of August 19,2015, and substitute those issued
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-03-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00012-CV
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-08-26 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00808-CV 6658929
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-03-26 · Published · cited 5× · 464 S.W.3d 754; 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 2941; 2015 WL 1457955
OPINION Evelyn V. Keyes, Justice In this workers’ compensation case, the University of Texas System (“UT”) sought judicial review of an order from the Texas Department of Insurance — Division of Workers’ Compensation (“the Division”) finding that Letitia Thomas, an employee of the University of Texas Medical Branch (“UTMB”), suffered a compensable injury