Cases

[Cite as State v. Bradley, 2025-Ohio-304.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, : JUDGES: : Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff - Appellee : Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J. : H

604 N.E.2d 1242 (1992) Joseph D. BRADLEY, United States Bankruptcy Trustee, Appellant-Plaintiff-Respondent-Intervenor below, v. Ernest W. STILLER, Jr., M.D., and Starke Memorial Hospital, Appellees-Defendants-Petitioner below. No. 75A03-9208-CV-235. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District. December 22, 1992. Transfer Denied March 2, 1993.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT BRADLEY C. BIRKENFELD, Appellant, v. KEVIN M. COSTNER, Appellee. No. 4D21-2050 [July 28, 2022] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Joseph Geor

[Cite as State v. Bradley, 2017-Ohio-8155.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P. J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Ho

MEMORANDUM OPINION Re: Bronnimann Motions THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge. Pending before the Court are defendant Roland Bronnimann’s (“Bronnimann”) Motion to Dismiss the Cargill complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and the Car-gill plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Roland *64Bronnimann’s testimony.1 U

J-A13008-20 2020 PA Super 183 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : PATRICK JOSEPH BRADLEY :

782 N.W.2d 674 (2010) 2010 SD 40 STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Joseph E. BRADLEY, Defendant and Appellant. No. 25326. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs February 16, 2010. Decided May 12, 2010. *676 Marty J. Jackley, Attorney General, John M. Strohman,

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. When Philip Visser charged Packer Engineering Associates with age discrimination, the firm replied that Visser’s discharge nine months short of full vesting for a pension stemmed not from age but from a falling out with Kenneth Packer, the firm’s founder, namesake, and major domo. Packer Engineering, the employer, defended by contending that Packer, t

Judgment of sentence affirmed. CERCONE, J., concurred in the result. WATKINS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

582 A.2d 478 (1990) Robert W. BRADLEY, Respondent Below, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ex rel. Nancy R. PATTERSON, Guardian, ad litem, for Linda Stayton, Petitioner Below, Appellee. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: April 24, 1990. Decided: October 11, 1990. Rehearing Denied November 2, 1990. Joseph J. Longobardi, III of Ro

People v Hoffman (2025 NY Slip Op 07247) People v Hoffman 2025 NY Slip Op 07247 Decided on December 24, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected

[Cite as State v. Bradley, 2026-Ohio-232.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Case No. 2025 CA 00038 Plaintiff - Appellee Opinion And Judgment Entry -vs- Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas,

65 S.W.3d 874 (2002) 347 Ark. 518 Thomas Edmond BRADLEY v. STATE of Arkansas. No. CR 01-681. Supreme Court of Arkansas. February 7, 2002. *875 Phillip A. McGough, P.A., North Little Rock, for appellant. Mark Pryor, Att'y Gen., by: Misty Wilson Borkowski, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.<

DUGGAN, J. In this interlocutory appeal, the plaintiff, Joseph F. Hoffman, appeals the decision of the Superior Court (Smukler, J.) dismissing a portion of his complaint challenging a decision by the Town of Gilford Planning Board (planning board). We affirm. In December 1998, Fay’s Boat Yard, Inc. submitted a site plan to the planning board for improvements to its marina. The planning board approved

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Buck Otto White was indicted for possessing stolen firearms and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(j), and for being a felon in possession of firearms and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). At trial, the district court 1 overruled his objections to the admission of evidence

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Shirley Hoffman, who is missing her left arm below the elbow, brought this employment discrimination case under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”). Hoffman alleged that her employer, Caterpillar, Inc., engaged in unlawful disparate treatment by refusing to train her to operate a high-speed document sca

OPINION OF THE COURT BIGGS, Circuit Judge. In this diversity action1 Hoffman, plaintiff-appellee cross-appellant, sought to recover damages for serious and permanent injuries allegedly sustained as the result of ingesting the drug chloroquine phosphate, which was manufactured by Sterling Drug, Inc. and Winthrop Laboratories, Inc., and marketed under the trade name of Aralen. C

Cardona, P.J. Cross appeals from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court (Kramer, J.), entered November 12, 2004 in Schenectady County, which denied defendants’ motions for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict and partially granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment seeking contractual indemnification from third-party defendant Mid-South Electronics, Inc. On October 2, 2000, plai

527 F.Supp.2d 661 (2007) Adrienne BRADLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY d/b/a/ Phillips Chemical Company, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-05-3912. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. December 18, 2007. *662 *663 Grover G. Hankins, The Hankins

OPINION BIVINS, Judge. Defendant appeals from the district court’s final order on a metropolitan court appeal. On appeal, Defendant argues that the district court should have granted his motion to dismiss because the case was not brought to trial in the metropolitan court within six months as required by SCRA 1986, 7-506(B) (Repl.1990). Other issues raised