Cases

CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur with the majority opinion that there is an implied right of action under the 911 Law and that the Districts’ 911 Law and TFCA claims survive summary judgment. However, I write separately to dissent from section II.B of the majority

MEMORANDUM CURTIS L. COLLIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE For many years, the Tennessee 911 emergency telephone call system has served and continues to serve a very worthwhile public purpose. That system relies upon the collection of mandatory fees from subscribers to telephone land lines. However, as communication technology has advanced, the-telecommunications industiy has become much more sophisticated,

MEMORANDUM CURTIS L. COLLIER, Chief Judge. Tennessee has set up a system to allow individuals to call a single number, “911,” to obtain assistance in emergencies. The 911 number has become so widely known that it is now ubiquitous. The state also set up a system to manage 911 calls and the emergency response and provided a mechanism to fund the system. This case involves the ubiquitous emergenc

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0067p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COUNTY EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS DISTRICT ┐ (16-5149); BRADLEY COUNTY EMERGENCY │ COMMUNICATIONS DISTRICT (16-5150); BLOUNT │ COUNTY EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS DISTRICT

671 F.3d 881 (2011) In re NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION, Tash Hepting; Gregory Hicks; Erik Knutzen; Carolyn Jewel, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AT & T Corporation; AT & T, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, United States of America, Defendant-intervenor-Appellee. Sean Basinski, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; All Plaintiffs

MEMORANDUM OPINION ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Martin Hayes pursues this case against Voestalpine Nortrak, Inc. (“Nortrak”) un*1317der the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2611 et seq. Doc. 1. Hayes alleges t

This appeal arises from a dispute between the Alabama Commercial Mobile Radio Services ("CMRS") Board ("the CMRS Board") and the individual members of the CMRS Board, on the one hand, and T-Mobile South, LLC, and PowerTel Memphis, Inc. *Page 2 (hereinafter referred to collectively as "T-Mobile"), two providers of wireless telephone services, regarding emergency "911" service charges for purchasers of prepaid wireless service, on the other.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0026p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ANDREW COOPERRIDER; DEANS DINER, LLC, dba │ Brewed,

139 F.Supp.2d 782 (2001) Steve MIDDLETON, Plaintiff, v. BALL-FOSTER GLASS CONTAINER CO., L.L.C., Defendant. No. Civ.A. 3:99-CV-0964-P. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. February 2, 2001. *783 *784 John E. Wall, Jr., Laura Ellen Calhoun, Law Office of John E. Wall, Jr.,

107 F.Supp.2d 653 (2000) BELL ATLANTIC-PENNSYLVANIA, INC., Plaintiff, v. The PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. A. 99-5391. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 3, 2000. *654 Henry F. Siedzikowski, John M. Elliott, Elliott, Rihner, Siedzikowsky and Egan, P.C., Blue Bell, PA, Sa

OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals arise from claims that major telecommunications carriers assisted the government with intelligence gathering following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. News reports that the National Security Agency (“NSA”) undertook a warrantless eavesdropping program with alleged cooperation by telecommunications companies spawned dozens of lawsuits

KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. “To an imagination of any scope the most far-reaching form of power is not money, it is the command of ideas.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457, 478 (1897). I believe the statute before us is unconstitu

586 F.Supp.2d 732 (2008) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. No. MDL-1446. Civ.A. No. H-01-3624. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 8, 2008. *735 Richard J. Zook, Cunningham Darlow e