Cases

FILED DEC - 9 2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE Clerk of the Appellate Courts AT KNOXVILLE Rec'd by October 15, 2019 Session JE

119 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 180 (1988) 547 A.2d 455 Honorable Edward J. Bradley et al., Plaintiffs. Honorable W. Wilson Goode et al., Intervenor-Plaintiffs v. Honorable Robert P. Casey et al., Defendants. No. 1573 C.D. 1988. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Heard August 18, 1988. August 26, 1988. Heard August 18, 1988, before

ORDER: PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 1988, the order of the Commonwealth Court, dated September 19, 1988, at No. 1832 C.D.1988 is hereby affirmed and the City of Philadelphia is directed to immediately appropriate the reasonable and necessary funding to the Philadelphia Court System, since the mandate of County of Allegheny v. Commonwealth, 517 Pa. 65, 534 A.2d 760 (1987), upon w

385 Mass. 300 (1982) 431 N.E.2d 908 CARL CORT & others[1] vs. BRISTOL-MYERS COMPANY & others.[2] Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. October 5, 1981. February 18, 1982. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., WILKINS, ABRAMS, NOLAN, & LYNCH, JJ. A. Theodore Welburn (John F. Bradley, II, w

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CITY OF FORT MYERS GENERAL § EMPLOYEES’ PENSION FUND, and § ALASKA LABORERS-EMPLOYERS § RETIREMENT TRUST, on behalf of § themselves and other similarly § No. 368, 2019 situated former stockholders of § TOWERS WATSON & CO., § Court Below: §

CARLTON, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Donald McKeown, individually and as personal representative of the decedent, Janice McKeown, for and on behalf of all wrongful-death beneficiaries and as administrator of Janice’s estate, appeals the judgment of the Union County Circuit Court denying his motion for a new trial. Donald claims that the circuit court erred in excluding the cause of death listed on Janice’s death c

176 F.Supp.2d 1249 (2001) Bradley E. MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. Ray W. SCOTT, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 94-T-1266-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. December 4, 2001. *1250 Bobby Lee Cook, Cook & Palmour, Summerville, GA, Mark B. Hutton, Derek S. Casey, Hutton & Hutton, Wichita, KS, Robert B

434 F.3d 412 George T. FRANKLIN, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,v.Carl S. ANDERSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. No. 03-3636. No. 03-3697. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 17, 2005. Decided and Filed: January 9, 2006. COPYRIGHT MAT

199 Wis.2d 714 (1996) 546 N.W.2d 140 STATE of Wisconsin EX REL. Tommy G. THOMPSON, Governor, State of Wisconsin, Petitioner, John T. BENSON, State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction and James E. Doyle, Attorney General, Necessary-Parties, Marquelle MILLER, Cynthia Miller, Angela Gray, Zachery Gray, Shon Richardson, George Richardson, Latrisha Henry, Faye Henry, Reigne Barrett,

550 F.Supp.2d 1 (2008) In re SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: All Actions. Civil Action No. 07-00143 (RBW). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 1, 2008. John C. Millian, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC, for Paul J. *2 Klaassen, J. Douglas Holladay, Thomas J.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Donald Stanley and Sean Reiter, Individually and as Class Representatives, Respondents, v. Southern States Police Benevolent Association, Inc., Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2019-000182 Appeal From Charleston County Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5882 Heard November 10, 2021 – Filed December 22, 2021 DISMISSED James Andrew Yoho, of Boyle,

OPINION K.K. HALL, Circuit judge: Carl Thompson appeals an order of the district court denying his application for attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. We must decide whether the district court abused its discretion in finding the government’s position “substantially justified.” Because the administrative law judge

REDACTED OPINION AND ORDER LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District' Judge: In this antitrust suit, Plaintiff U.S. Airways, Inc. (“US Airways”) alleges that Sabre Holdings Corporation, Sabre Travel International Ltd., and Sabre GLBL Inc. (collectively, “Sabre”) charged U.S. Airways grossly inflated airline booking fees and conspired with Sabre’s competitors to resist an innovative program developed by U.S. Airw

h SAUNDERS. Judge. MOTION TO DISMISS On February 27, 1995, Bernard E. Re-gan and his grandson, Timothy R. Regan, were traveling on La. Highway 395 when their vehicle was struck by a fertilizer spreader being operated by Larris Daigle (“Daigle”), an employee of R & M Spreader. Bernard E. Regan was killed and Timothy R. Regan was injured in the accident. The parents of Timothy R. Reg

WHIPPLE, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. Under the facts of this case, to the extent that the majority opinion finds that the judges herein are granted absolute immunity for their alleged acts of wrongdoing and affirms the trial court's judgment maintaining the judges' peremptory exception of no cause of action, I agree with the majority. I also concur in the majority opinion ins

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Cagle brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the final administrative decision of the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare denying plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under the Social Security Act (the Act). We affirm in part and remand wi

218 Wis.2d 835 (1998) 578 N.W.2d 602 Warner JACKSON, Jennifer Evans, Wendell Harris, The Reverend Andrew Kennedy, Rabbi Isaac Serotta, Ceil Ann Libber, Father Thomas J. Mueller, Reverend John N. Gregg, Diane Brewer, Colleen Beaman, Mary Morris, Penny Morse, Kathleen Jones and Philip Jones, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. John T. BENSON, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Department of Public Instruction and James E. Doyle, D

Order Granting Motion to Dismiss SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Doc. 16). • Plaintiff Matthew Sahm filed this suit against Defendant Miami University after the University expelled him for a violation of the University’s Code of Student Conduct. Miami University moved for dismissal. In an Order

530 S.E.2d 746 (2000) 243 Ga. App. 132 LANG et al. v. BECHAM et al. No. A99A2345. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 8, 2000. Reconsideration Denied March 27, 2000. *747 Reynolds & McArthur, W. Carl Reynolds, Bradley J. Survant, Macon, for appellants. Jones, Cork & Miller, T

On motion of F. Aaron Negangard, Chief Deputy Attorney General of the State of Indiana, and Cathleen M. Shrader, President of the State Board of Law Examiners, both members of the Bar of this Court, each applicant named in Exhibit A is by Order of this Court now duly sworn and admitted to practice as an attorney at law, and their respective names are ordered entered upon the Roll of Attorneys of this Court in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Cou